re: Trump needs to act now

quote:

---

According to who? Gtfo with this shite. You honestly believe 80 Million people voted for a dementia patient? You think Biden was more popular than Obama, by a lot?

---

He's absolutely not more popular than Obama, and most Democrats straight up dislike him if not feel completely underwhelmed by him.

It's not his popularity that drove votes for him though, it was hatred (or media-fueled fear, really) of Trump. Got a lot of people to stand up and vote who were scared. So this isn't the right argument.

Debunked.

quote:

---

Social media users have been sharing posts claiming that during the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4 there were vote dumps of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots only for Democrat Joe Biden in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, suggesting this proves voter fraud allegations.

These vote spikes did occur, but they also included Trump votes, accounted for largely left-leaning urban counties, and one state experienced a clerical error.

The posts (here , here , here , here) appear to originate from a tweet (here) by Nick Adams, who describes himself as a bestselling author endorsed by President Trump (twitter.com/NickAdamsinUSA).

A spokesman for data analysis website FiveThirtyEight ( fivethirtyeight.com/ ) told Reuters via email that the jumps in Michigan and Wisconsin were due to counties releasing large batches of results all at once and that the votes were not just for Biden. One large jump of almost 140,000 ballots in Michigan was due to a clerical error that has since been resolved. In Pennsylvania both the Trump and Biden campaign gained around 1 million votes on the night of Nov. 3 to Nov. 4.

Reuters has previously debunked claims that vote spikes prove Democrats are trying to steal the election in Wisconsin and Michigan ( here ).

The vote spikes did occur, but they were not only Biden votes and can be explained by pro-Biden county vote dumps and a clerical error. The timings of when ballots were received in Michigan and Pennsylvania are not accurate.

---

reuters

quote:

---

bullshite. There was evidence submitted with the complaints, and there was evidence submitted with the motions for preliminary injunction.

---

Then you should easily be able to show us one case where a judge went through all of the evidence and thoroughly f*cking debunked it. We're waiting.

Just because that little f*cking dude Rachel Madcow tells you it’s true doesn’t mean it is. If you weren’t so f*cking stupid you would’ve learned that over the last four f*cking years. But you are a brain dead, brainwashed, f*cking moron.

quote:

---

Marc Elias, a lawyer who has filed and defended cases on behalf of Democrats, keeps a tally on the outcome of the election cases.

"It is 63 losses by Trump and his allies," Elias told PolitiFact the morning of Jan. 8. "We treat each case separately — so if there is a federal case and a state case, we treat them as two cases. We only ever count a case one time — so if there is an appeal or remand, we do not treat that as a separate loss."

The one case where Trump found success didn’t involve an allegation about fraud. The case centered on reducing the amount of time Pennsylvania voters had to fix errors on their mail-in ballots. The matter involved a small number of ballots that didn’t change the outcome.

Trump wasn't a plaintiff in all of them, some were his allies or supporters echoing Trump’s claims. The lawsuits failed for various reasons: some had errors in the filings, others lacked standing. Mainly, the allegations lacked proof.

---

politifacts

quote:

---

I'm a conservative that voted for Trump and believe he won...by a lot. I think you mistook my post.

---

I apologize.

Do your research. This situation is 100% under control. The good guys will win.

I think a lot of you have this idea that liberals must love Biden and Harris to vote for them, so it doesn't make sense that they voted for these two historically underwhelming candidates.

They really don't. They would have voted for a wet potato against Trump.

I don't think either of them were any sane person's first choice.

quote:

---

He's absolutely not more popular than Obama, and most Democrats straight up dislike him if not feel completely underwhelmed by him.

---

Well the same person who claimed vote fraud had been debunked used a bogus approval poll fir Trump while ignoring Biden’s pathetic polling numbers, then is still under the belief Biden got 15+ million more votes than Obama. Wants things both ways!

It's not his popularity that drove votes for him though, it was hatred (or media-fueled fear, really) of Trump. Got a lot of people to stand up and vote who were scared. So this isn't the right argument.[/quote]

I am surprised, I didn’t know dead people could stand nor be scared. I also didn’t know the same votes could be counted several times over like in GA or that one candidate could get more than 100% turn out or have a block of 100k+votes come in and none for the other. I think any approach is the correct approach to point out the indiscretions of this election which point to the fraud.

quote:

---

Got a lot of people to stand up and vote who were scared.

---

bullshite. The difference was mail-in and absentee ballot fraud.

quote:

---

TigersOfGeauxld

---

Your boy Biden even said in a speech that his crew had the best vote fraud team ever. So what was that? Did he mis-speak? Well then that type of dumbass error at his level when he should be fresh from not campaigning presents you with a whole other set of issues.

I recall that was Obama’s excuse with the whole 57+ states gaffe, he was tired from campaigning according to the lefties. What’s Biden’s excuse? There is no good explanation for that utterance!