- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:51 am to Powerman
quote:
Is that the woman that he said enjoyed being raped by him?
Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:52 am to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
Trump rapes your brain daily
Posted on 9/8/25 at 9:57 am to KCT
You sent the signal.....bastard. 
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:11 am to Nachomama
quote:
This stupid woman can't even state what year this supposedly took place; total BS.
It has been proven that in New York with Donald Trump as the defendant, nothing like that matters. Terrible precedent.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:13 am to Powerman
And I think her cat is named pussy
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
While technically there is one higher court, it's unlikely they would take this case unless they want to modify NYT v. Sullivan.
There is a HUGE due process issue in this case (reanimating a cause of action long after SOL had tolled). That State of NY reopened it for a single year just so she could file that suit is even more glaring. Not to mention the ridiculous evidentiary rulings during the trial.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:31 am to Powerman
quote:
Is that the woman that he said enjoyed being raped by him?
I have to assume this is a typo. She's the one who said rape is sexy.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:32 am to udtiger
quote:
There is a HUGE due process issue in this case (reanimating a cause of action long after SOL had tolled). That State of NY reopened it for a single year just so she could file that suit is even more glaring. N
I don't believe Trump raised this in this appeal.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:33 am to imjustafatkid
BTW... the panel
Kahn - Born in Angola - Biden Appointee
Chin - Born in Hong Kong - Obama Appointee
Merriman - Biden Appointee
GMAFB
Kahn - Born in Angola - Biden Appointee
Chin - Born in Hong Kong - Obama Appointee
Merriman - Biden Appointee
GMAFB
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 10:39 am
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:36 am to udtiger
quote:
Starting with the bullshite reopening of the SOL.
If the Supremes do that. They may open another can of worms with the New Orleans Diocese Bankruptcy case.
That was also a result of a state law changing the SOL.
This could be what the Diocese is hoping for for the claimants:
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
It was raised in a separate appeal. Also, you cant waive constitutional violations.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:40 am to Tarps99
Correct. LA changed a similar prescriptive rule that made a bunch of prescribed cases viable again. It's not uncommon with sexual assault litigation, generally.
Article from 2022 on this
And Trump wasn't the only one snagged with the lawsuit. Wasn't this how Diddy, Eric Adams, and others got sued?
Article from 2022 on this
quote:
As of December 2019, eight states and Washington, D.C. had set look back windows for victims of past abuse looking for justice under the updated sexual abuse laws, according to the Associated Press (AP).
States that have offered victims a look back window include New York, New Jersey, California, Arizona, Montana, Hawaii, Vermont, and North Carolina. Each of these windows allows survivors of abuse to file suits against their abusers and institutions that may have allowed the abuse to occur, no matter when that abuse took place.
Colorado and Louisiana have, since the AP article, been added to this number with look back windows of their own.
And Trump wasn't the only one snagged with the lawsuit. Wasn't this how Diddy, Eric Adams, and others got sued?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Correct. LA changed a similar prescriptive rule that made a bunch of prescribed cases viable again. It's not uncommon with sexual assault litigation, generally.
BIG difference between a law to give minors/powerless an opportunity to be heard versus an adult female.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:47 am to udtiger
Not all the states referenced were that specific. None have been overturned by federal courts.
In terms of the Defendant's due process rights, what is the difference?
quote:
BIG difference between a law to give minors/powerless an opportunity to be heard versus an adult female.
In terms of the Defendant's due process rights, what is the difference?
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:55 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
He needs to counter sue her arse in a court in the panhandle of Florida for a billion.
This is the way. Offset the judgements.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 10:56 am to udtiger
quote:
It was raised in a separate appeal.
So, there is still another appeal out there for this case? Same court?
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 10:56 am
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:01 am to Powerman
BTW Powerman, that was some terrific melting in the football jersey thread last week.
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:01 am to TDTOM
Apparently
Posted on 9/8/25 at 11:02 am to TDTOM
Isn't this the mentality ill woman who has rape fantasies?
This post was edited on 9/8/25 at 12:24 pm
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News