- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump just tweeted he will release full transcript
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
How can Congress tell whether or not the whistleblower complaint is credible if they don’t have access to the complaint?
Because they have the transcripts, not hearsay?
How many more times do I have to say this?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
tigerinDC09
quote:
Decatur
I am not going to lie. You two are a couple of stupid motherfrickers.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:59 pm to Decatur
quote:
As I understand the complaint involves more than just the phone call.
You understand incorrectly. It involves someone either hearing about the call second-hand or reading about the call. The "whistleblower" is not providing first-hand information.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:59 pm to loogaroo
Sky screamers demand he release the transcripts. He releases the transcripts. This is their response. FFS.
quote:
You have lied nearly 13,000 times since you took office.
You literally tell, on average, 12 lies every day.
At this point, releasing the transcript is pointless. It's bound to be full of lies.
Time to #impeachdonaldtrumpnow #impeachment
#tuesdaythoughts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:59 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
How can Congress tell whether or not the whistleblower complaint is credible if they don’t have access to the complaint?
Because they will have the actual transcript of the call? Not sure if serious.
Because they will have the same info that the DNI IG had to conclude the complaint was credible.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:59 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
Once the transcript is released, what in Zues's butthole is the whistle blower going to say?
Didn't Mazier say that, regardless of what they transcript said, they know what Trump REALLY meant, and based on that, impeachment was imminent?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:00 pm to Bard
quote:
You understand incorrectly. It involves someone either hearing about the call second-hand or reading about the call. The "whistleblower" is not providing first-hand information.
Again, how do you know this to be true?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:00 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Deflect, deflect, deflect!!!!
fricking idiots
fricking idiots
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:00 pm to tigerinDC09
It was another DNC propaganda arm,wapo. Dumb dumb.
Read your own post.
Wapo. Bwahahahaha
Dear lord, you freaks will never learn.
Read your own post.
Wapo. Bwahahahaha
Dear lord, you freaks will never learn.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:00 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Again, how do you know this to be true?
Basic fricking logic?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:01 pm to tigerinDC09
you put waaayyyy too much stock in NYT and WaPo reporting bro.
Ukraine is already on record and we are about to get the full transcript. You need to drop this and start lathering up for the impeachment proceedings, otherwise known as Dem Waterloo!
Ukraine is already on record and we are about to get the full transcript. You need to drop this and start lathering up for the impeachment proceedings, otherwise known as Dem Waterloo!
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:02 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Well obviously there is nothing in it then.
that's a damn shame too... because I wanted it to be chock full of crap to take biden to the cleaners.
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:02 pm to Decatur
quote:
How can Congress tell whether or not the whistleblower complaint is credible if they don’t have access to the complaint?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to SSpaniel
Lol are they really angling towards impeaching a POTUS without hard evidence based on their completely biased interpretation on actual transcripts?
Do I have this correct?
Do I have this correct?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
DC is worried Trump will de-fund his midnight basketball program
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Because they will have the same info that the DNI IG had to conclude the complaint was credible.
Do you have this tattooed on your arse?
How many times do you need to get nuked into orbit over this talking point before you learn a new trick?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
Is the allegation that Trump asked for (extorted) FALSE information?
I mean, if a foreign power HAS information that is factually correct - I have no issue demanding they provide it before we give them money.
Hell, the FBI extorts all the time: Come testify or go to prison. If we THINK you lied to us, we will bankrupt you and imprison you for THAT.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
you put waaayyyy too much stock in NYT and WaPo reporting bro.
But wait, aren't those the same people you are using to say the whistleblower didn't have 1st hand access to the phone call?
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:04 pm to NIH
The Clay Davis fund for youth basketball
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:04 pm to NIH
quote:
No new wars. Economy doing well. No protected class has lost any rights. Can you explain why you are so desperate? Thanks.
There's only one reason why:

Popular
Back to top



0









