- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:23 pm to TurkeyBaconLeg
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:23 pm to TurkeyBaconLeg
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:24 pm to BuckyCheese
Yes or no
They should not be able to add all the extra BS & hypotheticals
They should not be able to add all the extra BS & hypotheticals
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:24 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Answer the question Schiff...
Come on, proof that Zelinksky knew that the aid was based on investigation

Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:25 pm to cajunangelle
schiff got cut off again 
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:25 pm to Lsut81
Long way around to keep from saying "No".
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:25 pm to cajunangelle
Answer is NO Mittens. You Bitch!
Dog Killer!
Dog Killer!
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:26 pm to HubbaBubba
my fox live feed just ended? what's the deal?
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:26 pm to Centinel
Epic dude is talking about his arse anyway 
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:27 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Answer is NO Mittens. You Bitch!
No, that was a damn good question by mittens. He got schiff up there to peddle his bullshite, then Trump's team refer back to Schiff's own witnesses where they said point blank "no."
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:27 pm to LSUJML
quote:
Yes or no
They should not be able to add all the extra BS & hypotheticals
Let the dems present a case based off presumptions and fanciful misrepresentations of facts. It only makes them look ridiculous. The jurors speak their legal lingo, they know its all trash.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:28 pm to KingOrange
quote:
Cspan Baw!
on it now, thanks
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:28 pm to Centinel
quote:It actually was and that weasel did what weasels do.
No, that was a damn good question by mittens. He got schiff up there to peddle his bullshite, then Trump's team refer back to Schiff's own witnesses where they said point blank "no."
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:29 pm to HubbaBubba
The fact it was mittens who asked that bodes well for the vote tomorrow.
Murkowski and Collins with zingers yesterday too.
Murkowski and Collins with zingers yesterday too.
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:29 pm to HubbaBubba
More skewing AD’s statement. Disgusting
Posted on 1/30/20 at 9:30 pm to Centinel
quote:True but I didn't want to say it out loud and jinx it.
The fact it was mittens who asked that bodes well for the vote tomorrow.
Murkowski and Collins with zingers yesterday too.
Why Is Schiff up again.
Popular
Back to top



0










