- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump fires director of U.S. Copyright Office Shira Perlmutter
Posted on 5/11/25 at 4:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 5/11/25 at 4:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
There's that Harvard again lol
Posted on 5/11/25 at 4:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why do they all look the same?
Posted on 5/11/25 at 4:46 pm to FightinTigersDammit
If Kamala would have won they would have done the same thing to podcasters. Obviously podcasters don’t pay royalities for music but they would have came up with something to shut them down.. it’s the same concept. They want to protect the mainstream media outlets and silence independent podcasters and internet radio stations that play music
Posted on 5/11/25 at 6:39 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
No problem with that at all.
Of course you would have no problem with that at all. Never mind that now those same people that want free use of everything on their platforms also want free use of literally everything anywhere protected by any IP law. By free use they mean that they want to be able to use their AI to mine the information and use it for financial gain without compensating the original creators in any way. Oh, and they want this ability whilst still being able to vehemently defend their own intellectual properties.
No conflict of interest here......none at all.
This post was edited on 5/11/25 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 5/12/25 at 4:55 am to LegendInMyMind
I understand the concern, but demanding we "abide" by IP and let the world have access is not the answer either.
Travel the world a little. You see all those kids with the little mermaid mochillas, you think they bought them on line from the disney store? How about those nike sneakers they are wearing?
Travel the world a little. You see all those kids with the little mermaid mochillas, you think they bought them on line from the disney store? How about those nike sneakers they are wearing?
Posted on 5/12/25 at 5:44 am to Chancellor
quote:
I’d have already fired her just for having a stupid arse name.
You mean Jewish? Both are fairly common Jewish names.
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:19 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
I understand the concern, but demanding we "abide" by IP and let the world have access is not the answer either.
You're talking about billion dollar plus companies. I'm concerned for real people who rely on the protection of IP laws every day for a living. The tech giants are cutting the legs out from under every single one of them, and want to do so unfettered and unencumbered by law. Disney should be the least of anyone's concern in this scenario.
Posted on 5/18/25 at 4:49 pm to trinidadtiger
I love how the entirety of the tech industry is predicated on intellectual property rights being as important as actual property rights but right up until the moment they need to infringe on everyone else’s IP rights at globe spanning scale…then, but of course, that is just the cost of progress.
Popular
Back to top


0






