- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump fired the National Science Board. Oh No!
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:12 pm
https://apnews.com/article/national-science-board-nsf-trump-6a23f3ab1b4c6eb131b4e79d95b3536f
Now science things wont get funded like...
Look if you are on a board and you let that pass you deserved to get fired.
Now science things wont get funded like...
quote:
The agency provided $905,642 for a “qualitative inquiry into sex/gender narratives in undergraduate biology and their impacts on transgender, non-binary, and gender non-conforming students” to create a “more inclusive environment.”
quote:
The NSF provided $119,520 for a conference titled “Re-imagining Biology Education Through Social Justice,” featuring a talk on “Gender-Inclusive Adaptations to Biology Teaching.”
quote:
$772,953 in spending on “Black Feminist Epistemologies: Building a Sisterhood in Computing.”
quote:
$399,930 was spent on a project to honor “indigenous knowledge” by “infusing native ways of knowing into engineering education,” but without engaging in the “misappropriation of indigenous knowledge.”
quote:
The NSF provided $1.29 million to promote “youth as participatory designers of indigenous mixed reality science exhibits” that address “the ongoing marginalization of indigenous communities in informal science learning spaces.”
quote:
$3 million NSF grant in quantum mechanics will “detect phenomena that evade identification in the human-scaled realm of lived experience,” such as how “students perceive themselves as science learners via their science identity, [and] racial and gender identity.”
Look if you are on a board and you let that pass you deserved to get fired.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:15 pm to Narax
The next two and a half years are going to be fun to watch.
We're living in interesting times.
We're living in interesting times.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:15 pm to Narax
quote:
National Science Board
This is right up there with having a Ministry of Truth. These things shouldn't exist as government entities.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:22 pm to Narax
i really messed up not jumping on board with this earlier
i mean one contract doing a 30 minute seminar on why male toads contribute to the existential crisis of minority traffic accidents on rural roads and bam…
$3 mil and an early retirement

i mean one contract doing a 30 minute seminar on why male toads contribute to the existential crisis of minority traffic accidents on rural roads and bam…
$3 mil and an early retirement
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:24 pm to Woobie
quote:
i really messed up not jumping on board with this earlier
You and me both.
Though it looks like some voters were getting their cut...
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:27 pm to Narax
I see a lot of discontent in the academic ranks, which some having left to go overseas. While research cuts to my field (ag) haven’t been too severe, where would you go that’s better?
Canada? Wages are shite. Europe? Science support is terrible. China? They’re the only bright spot, and beginning to dominate science output, but it’s China.
Canada? Wages are shite. Europe? Science support is terrible. China? They’re the only bright spot, and beginning to dominate science output, but it’s China.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:34 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
While research cuts to my field (ag) haven’t been too severe, where would you go that’s better?
Yea if anything we are funding exactly like China now.
quote:
Europe? Science support is terrible
Taxes and low salaries make it a dump for STEM.
Australia is pretty win though for those who want to move. They are just being picky with who they take, as they know they have the pick of the litter.
quote:
China? They’re the only bright spot, and beginning to dominate science output, but it’s China.
One of my friends got an offer to go teach in China, they are definitely trying to grab US researchers...
But in useful things, like you mentioned AG, not in weird US sex and race things.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:36 pm to Bengalbio
What fields are you seeing discontent in?
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:48 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
What fields are you seeing discontent in?
Electric fields
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:48 pm to Narax
quote:
Trump fired the National Science Board
Looks like they didn’t follow the science.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:52 pm to Narax
Didn't read all of that but...
We are all going to die!!!!!!!!
We are all going to die!!!!!!!!
Posted on 4/27/26 at 9:55 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Ha, fair. I do wonder how much churn at the top affects stuff like battery/storage research though. That’s one of those areas where if we fall behind a bit, it shows up later in energy costs and dependence.
This post was edited on 4/27/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:33 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Ha, fair. I do wonder how much churn at the top affects stuff like battery/storage research though. That’s one of those areas where if we fall behind a bit, it shows up later in energy costs and dependence.
You're totally correct.
We should give them a pass because
battery storage.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 10:37 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
I get that. I’m not saying give anything a pass - I’m just wondering if people think areas like storage/grid research are actually insulated from this kind of churn or not.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:05 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
I get that. I’m not saying give anything a pass - I’m just wondering if people think areas like storage/grid research are actually insulated from this kind of churn or not.
Everyone is going to suffer a bit, hopefully we make it up by no longer burning several hundred million a year on bad research.
When you have a rotten plank you need to replace it.
That group was a long term liability.
But yes, short term all research suffers, but all research was already suffering due to losing funding to loser social research.
Posted on 4/27/26 at 11:13 pm to Narax
That’s a fair way to put it - there’s definitely a tradeoff there and I think that’s the part I’m trying to get a feel for - how much of the "short-term hit" is just fewer projects vs actually losing people/training capacity (which I see happening in biomedicine - biomedical stuff especially seems a little different there since so much of it runs through NIH/university pipelines).
Posted on 4/28/26 at 4:31 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
BS
Labs in private companies across this country are doing the work.
Labs in private companies across this country are doing the work.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 5:31 am to Narax
Send them all to Canada for end of life health care.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 6:20 am to TigerDoc
quote:
areas like storage/grid research
This kind of work is done by EPRI which is mostly funded by the power industry. So no effect.
Posted on 4/28/26 at 6:25 am to TigerDoc
quote:
fair. I do wonder how much churn at the top affects stuff like battery/storage research though. That’s one of those areas where if we fall behind a bit, it shows up later in energy costs and dependence.
These aren’t the type of issues that the NSB were tackling
Popular
Back to top

7










