- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trigger Warning: UMC nurses in NO vote to unionize
Posted on 12/11/23 at 10:55 pm to Nynna11
Posted on 12/11/23 at 10:55 pm to Nynna11
quote:
How many hospital CEOs do you know? I’ve met quite a few, not many of whom I would trust with decisions about my family’s healthcare.
Three. I’d trust any of them with decisions about my family’s healthcare.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 10:56 pm to Nynna11
quote:
Ask me, or any other RN and we will assure you that most are very dangerous places to be - and most of us don’t leave family members alone.
So nurses don’t trust other nurses. That’s mostly from experience?
Posted on 12/11/23 at 11:01 pm to RealityWinsOut
quote:
With the type of people in the NO workforce, the last thing I'd want is to be in a unionized hospital for care. Worthless garbage entitled people being more entitled is going to kill people and the hospital is going to be blamed not the union or the unionized worker. If a worker wants to be unionized them and the union she be held responsible for the workers mistake(s).
Right now there is nobody protecting patients from the greed of corporate hospitals who force unsafe staffing ratios. Nurses are concerned about much more than salary. We are concerned about the unsafe conditions for patients and staff. Most hospital mistakes that are making healthcare more dangerous are because of cost cuts that force unsafe conditions.
This post was edited on 12/11/23 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:02 am to the808bass
quote:
So nurses don’t trust other nurses. That’s mostly from experience?
It’s not the nurses that we don’t trust, it’s the lack of them.
Also the decisions being made by non-clinicians that affect patient care.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:06 am to Nynna11
quote:
Also the decisions being made by non-clinicians that affect patient care.
Give me an example of this that doesn’t involve patient load.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:09 am to the808bass
quote:
So nurses don’t trust other nurses. That’s mostly from experience?
It’s because most female nurses are whores. One whore simply doesn’t trust another.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:58 am to the808bass
quote:
Give me an example of this that doesn’t involve patient load.
Just a few of the many:
1. Not transferring a well insured patient to another facility for specialized care when certain vital equipment was not available.
2. Discharging patients who are not well enough because insurance companies were pressuring them.
3. In an inpatient setting that insurance pays by covered days, pressuring providers NOT to discharge the patient when they still have covered days.
4. Keeping patients in “observation” for days instead of admitted status to avoid Medicare penalties for readmissions within a certain time frame.
The former CEO at a hospital in which I worked threatened staff that anyone who worked at a surgery center that was opening down the street would never be eligible for rehire. He later filed a lawsuit against another surgical center that a group of doctors were opening, which caused a lengthy delay in the opening.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 12:59 am to momentoftruth87
How old are you, 13?
Posted on 12/12/23 at 2:40 am to Nynna11
“I can’t imagine being dumb enough to go into a career then start crying for them to change the system.”
I guess you might consider me to be one of those dummies.Actually,I was naive and ignorant of the realities of “healthcare” and hospitals.I was the first nurse ever in my family and I didn’t really know any nurses except on a casual basis.
I went into as an idealistic rube that thought hospitals are noble places,Drs were all Marcus Welby and nurses were all Florence Nightingales.
The reality is that some hospital administrators are humanitarians that want the best for the patients,others are money grubbing charlatans that care for nothing except their bonuses and looking good by maximizing profits to look good for their corporate overlords.When bad things happen because of understaffing,lack of equipment,etc.they are masters at shifting the blame to the middle managers and giving them the boot.
A sure sign of a crappy administration is a middle management “reorganization”that typically occurs every couple of years.Some get fired and others are shifted to other departments.A smooth talking administrator can hold on to their jobs for a good many years by making it look like they are addressing the problems.Soon or later,corporate catches on when the lawsuits start piling up,Dr’s complaints become
overwhelming,employee expenses become too great because of excessive turnover.
Then they get canned but it is always presented as they resigned for some believable reason.Corporate doesn’t want anyone to know they had an incompetent administrator running one of their hospitals,They probably don’t even want to admit it to themselves.
All these hospital “experts” posting here allege that unionization will cause a lessening of quality of the nursing staff.I worked 31
years full time ICU-CCU and 2 years part time.My experience was that the quality of the nursing staff varied greatly.It ranged from 99 percentiles nurses to abject incompetents and those with a terminal case of laziness.Short staffing and failure to address substandard nurses leads to high turn over which leads to hospitals hiring anyone with a license and that can fog a mirror. It took something really serious for a nurse to be fired,almost never happened.
So in reality,I doubt there will be much change in the quality of nursing staff.
Only thing that might change is nurse patient ratios.I was never for unionization of nurses but hospitals have no one to blame but themselves if it occurs.
I don’t regret my career choice but my last years were miserable.My shoulders were
wrecked from the large percentage of morbidly obese pts.we recieved.I couldn’t sleep in a bed my last 2 years and for close to a year after I quit.Several of my co-workers had rotator cuff surgeries,others wrecked their backs and left for that reason.
Lunch breaks became few and far between,maybe 1 out of 10 shifts due the workload. The hospital began requiring us to do our own EKG’s,draw our own blood samples and blood cultures.Ward secretaries were eleminated so there was no one to answer the phone.Number of diabetics increased greatly so blood sugar checks were a frequent occurrence.
My final straw was when computer charting was implemented.Just like administrators with no medical knowledge telling nurses how to do their jobs,computer programs were designed by programmers with little to no input from nurses,that was obvious.
I enjoyed the posts by Nynna 11,she (or he) has been there.
I guess you might consider me to be one of those dummies.Actually,I was naive and ignorant of the realities of “healthcare” and hospitals.I was the first nurse ever in my family and I didn’t really know any nurses except on a casual basis.
I went into as an idealistic rube that thought hospitals are noble places,Drs were all Marcus Welby and nurses were all Florence Nightingales.
The reality is that some hospital administrators are humanitarians that want the best for the patients,others are money grubbing charlatans that care for nothing except their bonuses and looking good by maximizing profits to look good for their corporate overlords.When bad things happen because of understaffing,lack of equipment,etc.they are masters at shifting the blame to the middle managers and giving them the boot.
A sure sign of a crappy administration is a middle management “reorganization”that typically occurs every couple of years.Some get fired and others are shifted to other departments.A smooth talking administrator can hold on to their jobs for a good many years by making it look like they are addressing the problems.Soon or later,corporate catches on when the lawsuits start piling up,Dr’s complaints become
overwhelming,employee expenses become too great because of excessive turnover.
Then they get canned but it is always presented as they resigned for some believable reason.Corporate doesn’t want anyone to know they had an incompetent administrator running one of their hospitals,They probably don’t even want to admit it to themselves.
All these hospital “experts” posting here allege that unionization will cause a lessening of quality of the nursing staff.I worked 31
years full time ICU-CCU and 2 years part time.My experience was that the quality of the nursing staff varied greatly.It ranged from 99 percentiles nurses to abject incompetents and those with a terminal case of laziness.Short staffing and failure to address substandard nurses leads to high turn over which leads to hospitals hiring anyone with a license and that can fog a mirror. It took something really serious for a nurse to be fired,almost never happened.
So in reality,I doubt there will be much change in the quality of nursing staff.
Only thing that might change is nurse patient ratios.I was never for unionization of nurses but hospitals have no one to blame but themselves if it occurs.
I don’t regret my career choice but my last years were miserable.My shoulders were
wrecked from the large percentage of morbidly obese pts.we recieved.I couldn’t sleep in a bed my last 2 years and for close to a year after I quit.Several of my co-workers had rotator cuff surgeries,others wrecked their backs and left for that reason.
Lunch breaks became few and far between,maybe 1 out of 10 shifts due the workload. The hospital began requiring us to do our own EKG’s,draw our own blood samples and blood cultures.Ward secretaries were eleminated so there was no one to answer the phone.Number of diabetics increased greatly so blood sugar checks were a frequent occurrence.
My final straw was when computer charting was implemented.Just like administrators with no medical knowledge telling nurses how to do their jobs,computer programs were designed by programmers with little to no input from nurses,that was obvious.
I enjoyed the posts by Nynna 11,she (or he) has been there.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 3:41 am to El Segundo Guy
quote:
public sector unions
should be abolished
Posted on 12/12/23 at 4:06 am to Nynna11
With unions, you will get promotions based on tenure not merit.
That should work out well at UMC.
The laughable part of this thread is I doubt there is one nurse posting here who works at UMC. I also doubt that there is a person here who is willing to go work at UMC now, even though it is a union shop.
That should work out well at UMC.
The laughable part of this thread is I doubt there is one nurse posting here who works at UMC. I also doubt that there is a person here who is willing to go work at UMC now, even though it is a union shop.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 4:09 am to 4cubbies
quote:The VA is a good example. Ever read any glowing reviews from veterans and their care at a VA center?
It’s like y’all are hoping this happens.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 4:18 am to Riverside
quote:So you are saying a staff nurse treats a patient and discharges said patient without having been seen by an NP or MD/DO? You work at a free clinic downtown large city or something?
Patient presents complaining of back pain. The ED nurse triages the patient, gives her an aspirin, and sends her home with instructions to follow-up with her PCP. My head is spinning due to the complexity. Clearly the ED nurse deserves a 7-figure salary.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 5:43 am
Posted on 12/12/23 at 4:30 am to Riverside
quote:
gives her an aspirin
Is this from 1953?

Posted on 12/12/23 at 5:02 am to the808bass
quote:I provided one earlier in the thread involving narcotics.
Give me an example of this that doesn’t involve patient load.
Here's another.
A CEO in a metro region facility, with an active cardiac surgical program and a new ICU expansion, decided to save money by switching to "afterhours" telemetric ICU medicine. He employed enough intensivists to cover the new expansion, but would have to hire two or three more to cover overnight in-house call.
Instead, he avoided the new hires, and sent his intensivists home after 7pm. He switched ICU care to telemed after 7pm. FWIW, telemetric ICU medicine is great for low volume rural facilities. But it is woefully dangerous for a high volume location.
The cardiac surgeons, who were also hospital employed, raised concerns to the point they were called in, and had their jobs threatened. The CEO and his minions refused to accept their expert counsel, concerns, or suggestions. He blew off their input as stubbornness, resistance to change, and resistance to cost-savings.
It took several deaths, multiple near-misses, one surgeon's resignation, the whole affair surviving a politicized PI process, and word filtering to newshouses before the "cost-saving" ICU tele-med program was shutdown.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 5:24 am
Posted on 12/12/23 at 5:18 am to rltiger
quote:The disappointing part of this thread is the lock-in to preconception without any attempt to understand nuance.
The laughable part of this thread
Once again, since Covid, poorly trained locum RNs are being imported to facilities. CEOs/Administration are monetarily incentivized to be dismissive of and callous to resultant diminution of nursing quality. Union contracts may (should) put an end to that BS, and return facilities to a more traditional safer clinical model.
It's unfortunate unions are necessary. They are inefficient, and will eventually add expense. But our current system leaves no other choice. Hopefully, other facilities will recognize the union threat, and take corrective measures on their own. Unfortunately, that die has been cast in many instances though.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:02 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Locum tenens nurses (travel nurses) typically are paid a good bit more that facility hired nurses. My experience was that the employed nurses resented the travel nurses because 1)they were paid more and 2) the staff nurses had to explain protocols, teach the EMR and tell them who to call when problems arose. The quality of the nurses varied but many were quite experienced but were handicapped by their being new. Doubt they can afford it now, but back in the day, new hires (new graduates, often) "shaddowed" experienced nurses for 6 weeks or more.
poorly trained locum RNs
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:04 am to rltiger
quote:
unions, you will get promotions based on tenure not merit.
Correct. And your coworkers will hate you for being above average.
Unions are an Uber toxic mob of reactionary simpletons. It creates mass psychosis.
Your coworkers will hate you and make your life miserable if you go above minimum output
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 6:17 am
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:24 am to momentoftruth87
2000-2012 USCG also worked with Navy. I literally got picked up my boss from jail, while he was on duty for getting drunk and fighting. The command knew, got NJP and made chief and now retired. That was in 2001ish.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 6:27 am to Diamondawg
quote:
disappointing part of this thread is the lock-in to preconception without any attempt to understand nuance
I get nuance. But I also get you'll screw yourself having to manage union personnel.
You don't want this.
Popular
Back to top
