- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:50 pm to Azkiger
quote:BRUISE TEST!!!1!1
Do you think if there was photographic evidence of bruising that Shapiro would say that Acosta didnt assault that female aid?
quote:I don't see anything about bruising in tweets by the OP fwiw. Is that the only "fact" Ben is referring to?
If youre claiming an inconsistency within Shapiro on this issue you have to answer "yes" and that would simply be a baseless assertion
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:53 pm to ell_13
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:11 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:54 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Azkiger
I feel like this is the part where I ask if you still beat your wife with a pillowcase half full of soap.
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:55 pm to DelU249
quote:
Every time I make fun of the guy they tell me I’m wrong, he’s not a publicity whore, he’s consistent. Consistency is all that matters.
i disagree with you about most things Shapiro, but his defense of Fields is the one thing I can't get behind.
sheer idiocy on his part.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 1:56 pm to DelU249
quote:
Leaving a bruise isn’t required.
You're right, that's above and beyond the criteria necessary for assault. You want to dig a deeper hole?
Again, I have no doubt that Shapiro would say Acosta assaulted her if he left bruises.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:05 pm to Azkiger
quote:
that's above and beyond the criteria necessary for assault
No.
Its irrelevant.
You're confused.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:05 pm to Azkiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:11 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:07 pm to 3nOut
quote:
i disagree with you about most things Shapiro, but his defense of Fields is the one thing I can't get behind.
Is it as bad as his agreeing with firing Roseanne then saying the egregiously racist New York Times editorial board member sara jeong shouldn't be fired?
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:09 pm to Turbeauxdog
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:10 pm to 3nOut
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:12 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
No.
Its irrelevant.
You're confused.
Come leave bruises on me from your bare hands and prove it
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:16 pm to Turbeauxdog
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:18 pm to DelU249
Shapiro is a pied piper for the NPCs on the right.
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:18 pm to DelU249
i fricking KNEW this was coming
i mean the Shapiro stance, not this thread (But obviously this thread once the expected Shapiro stance emerged)
i mean the Shapiro stance, not this thread (But obviously this thread once the expected Shapiro stance emerged)
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:25 pm to CptBengal
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:27 pm to DelU249
Hopefully this awakens the Shapiro fan club to realize he is the soy of all soy and LULZ if you want him to run as Prez
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:42 pm to SDVTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 12:10 am
Posted on 11/8/18 at 2:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Shapiro wants badly to be accepted by the media
Popular
Back to top


0






