- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:02 pm to The Baker
quote:
After midterms, I say lay down the smack at the border.
It is always "after ______" we will finally do something about the border and immigration...
Quite frankly, if this country is willing to wimp on this, here and now, then Trump doesn't even need to bother to run for a second term because WE ARE DONE... It either stops right here and now or it is OVER... period, end of story...
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:08 pm to The Baker
quote:
I say just let em in.
Europe said the same thing.
Now they have regrets.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:10 pm to The Baker
Baker, Im with you, Ive said this on quite a few threads. There are 45 million people who are migrants or anchor babies at this point. Its worth 10K more to put an end to it.
And with existing laws we cant stop them. They will all claim asylum, we dont have the judges nor border controls to process them all, and we have to release within 20 days.
Trump needs to mobilize some troops, have them stop about 20 miles from the border and practice manuevers, never coming close to the caravan. The media will be built into a frenzy chasing the military, and then....nothing, other than a pack of illegals crossing.
Classic Trump 4d chess.
And with existing laws we cant stop them. They will all claim asylum, we dont have the judges nor border controls to process them all, and we have to release within 20 days.
Trump needs to mobilize some troops, have them stop about 20 miles from the border and practice manuevers, never coming close to the caravan. The media will be built into a frenzy chasing the military, and then....nothing, other than a pack of illegals crossing.
Classic Trump 4d chess.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:13 pm to trinidadtiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:14 pm to The Baker
quote:
I’m not saying let all future caravans in.
Use this one as a pawn for the midterms
I think someone here did the math and it'll take them until at least Nov. 9th to get here at their average pace so far.
So what happens when they get here a couple days after the midterms are over? Letting them in would be for nought in that scenario.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:16 pm to RazorBroncs
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:17 pm to The Baker
And hopefully right to the polls Baker.
You dont think the libs see the fact that immigration is now the number one issue with voters, and they want controls. The babies in cages did not work, a few dead bodies are key to them swaying the vote.
Trump will let them through I bet.
You dont think the libs see the fact that immigration is now the number one issue with voters, and they want controls. The babies in cages did not work, a few dead bodies are key to them swaying the vote.
Trump will let them through I bet.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:19 pm to Zach
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:25 pm to Zach
Simple solution.
We already have areas where lawlessness is preferred.
These areas are called SANCTUARY CITIES.
Use some of that money saved on aid to Guatemala and spend it on busses with American bus drivers and of course they will need security on the way. Bus driver jobs. Bus leasing jobs. Security jobs.
Send the first ten thousand to San Francisco and ask Chuck and Nancy where they want the rest.
We already have areas where lawlessness is preferred.
These areas are called SANCTUARY CITIES.
Use some of that money saved on aid to Guatemala and spend it on busses with American bus drivers and of course they will need security on the way. Bus driver jobs. Bus leasing jobs. Security jobs.
Send the first ten thousand to San Francisco and ask Chuck and Nancy where they want the rest.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:28 pm to Pelican fan99
quote:Good luck having US military open fire on unarmed alleged asylum seekers. That would go over really well.
I'd much rather line the border with the military who is ready to defend the homeland at all costs
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:29 pm to The Baker
frick the optics. That’s some goofy assed Obama term anyway. As a Trump supporter, letting these bastards in is far worse “optics” than keeping them out.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:29 pm to The Baker
Trump should go ahead and send the military to the border in a massive number NOW. Send the signal that he is not going to allow these people to cross.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:30 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
I think someone here did the math and it'll take them until at least Nov. 9th to get here at their average pace so far.
They'll be bused in.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:32 pm to The Baker
quote:
Let the attenuated virus in. “Wake” as many ppl up as possible. And the build your immunity to the next one.
We already have 25 million illegals here now. People woke up when they elected Trump on the issue.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:32 pm to The Baker
quote:
I’m saying this is a vaccine shot in the arm.
Let the attenuated virus in. “Wake” as many ppl up as possible. And the build your immunity to the next one.
Yeah....no SSDW (Same Shiit Different Way)
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:32 pm to The Baker
I say let them sleep in your house if they get in since you're in favor of housing them because of the optics.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:34 pm to The Baker
quote:
The optics of 5000 people bull rushing through the border fence and scattering like ants will be jarring for middle America... while simultaneously avoiding the “women and children abused by ICE” trap which is almost certainly the left’s plan here.
I agree with you. It would be damaging to Democrats.
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:34 pm to Horsemeat
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/22/18 at 12:35 pm to The Baker
quote:
It’s not a cave. It’s allowing a case in point.
“This is what the left wants”
But that's precisely the point. That's what happens every time pre Jan 20 2017. The Dems say "oh just give us this, then we won't ask for any more" and stupid Republicans say "well, we can live with this, and they promised" then the next thing you know the Dems are no longer satisfied with what the idiotic right caved on and so on and so forth.
It is stupid. It isn't time to cave in to the left, it's time to cram "elections have consequences" right down their throats. After the elections , Republican leaders need to consolidate their power and financially hurt any members who won't vote with them. Meaning if you vote no you lose campaign money, and just shut the Dems completely out of the process.
Popular
Back to top


0






