Started By
Message

re: TIME has come - We need to DEMAND the DEM party DISOWN all the "NAZI/destroy democracy" rh

Posted on 9/15/24 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48183 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

They want a war.

I think they may get one this time - even I would join up - not as anything but cannon fodder - too weak to do any damage in attack mode.

But I do not want to live in the Democrat alternative - and this is our last chance to avoid it. The democrats have given us notice of their intention over the past 20 years, and demonstrated their willingness to enact it in the past decade.

IF they successfully steal THIS one, all other 'elections' will be conducted like North Korea's - 99.9 % for the incumbants - and the one or two no-voters executed.

I will not live in that nightmare.

but I am not thinking they can be stopped.
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

Not breaking into political divisions - I am referring to warranted and unwarranted. The J6 'mob' was merely protesting - until a few individual (acting as it in concert in multiple locations) began inciting conflict with the undermanned 'protection' officers on scene. Not going to describe all the non-typical 'mob' reactions nor even waste time on debunking any similarity to an 'insurrection.' It is just not close to being the serious infraction it is being made to be - all DEM efforts to INCITE a riot failed. NOTHING but lies have come from the DEM side on this thing - not one person in JAIL has been convicted - not even CHARGED - with "insurrection" It was merely a PROTEST - and a very calm one at that - until some 'Capital guards' started firing tear gas into their midst. Name all the OTHER 'riots' in the past 50 years that have come from the conservative side. I'll wager you cannot find ONE - it is not in the nature of conservatives to RIOT - that is go-to BAMN tactic of the Democrats. Try to convince anyone otherwise. Then compare to the 'Summer of Love" Democrat riots that consumed the entire summer of 2020 and destroyed billions of dollars worth of property and a dozen lives. Now what was the protest about??? - election fraud - the SAME Thing that EVERY conservative President has had thrown out at the J6 event of 'certifying the election' - look it up - not ONE election has been 'accepted' by all the DEMs. The difference is that THIS time - there was SUBSTANTIAL allegation of FRAUD in the election - and the "protest" was to show SUPPORT for those GOP legislators who were in line to PRESENT THIER CASE to the congress and the public. What on earth could have stopped that>> Nothing but an EMERGENCY declared by the SOTH - and then 'poof' - as if by MAGIC, an EMERGENCY was declared and those procedures eliminated all other debate. Don't forget the fake "PIPE BOMB" contingency that would have been activated had they not been able to incite a "insurrection"/riot. So much skullduggery - by people who have NEVER EVER been known to do anything of the sort. In comparison to the DEMOCRATs - who are programmed to RIOT at the drop of a hat - ANYTIME the democrats find themselves in a political disadvantage they call out the RIOTERs to consume the attention of the nation for the next several months until the scare goes away. Nobody SAW an insurrection - but the DEMCORATs invented one.



You sound exactly like CNN trying to call a RIOT with burning and looting a mostly peaceful protest.

While i absolutely condemn both, at the end of the day, I do hold the US Capitol in higher regard than I do Tar-Jay (Target). So yes, quantitatively there may have been more BLM riots. But the mob that attempted to disrupt the peaceful transition of power through violence was far worse.
This post was edited on 9/15/24 at 8:06 pm
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23212 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 8:09 pm to
How much do you blame Nancy Pelosi and the the DC mayor for not accepting the 10,000 national guard troops Trump offered them before J6? How much do you blame them for not having enough security in place? After all, it’s the Speaker and mayor’s responsibility
This post was edited on 9/15/24 at 8:19 pm
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48183 posts
Posted on 9/16/24 at 1:50 am to
quote:

So yes, quantitatively there may have been more BLM riots. But the mob that attempted to disrupt the peaceful transition of power through violence was far worse.

OK - the only way you can be this delusional is that you do not understand this 'peaceful transition of power' delusion.

Do you actually think there is ZERO capacity for the Congress to NOT certify the 'result's' that have been reported to the public??

Every election cycle sees some representatives object to accepting the electoral votes from some states for various reasons - happens every election.

THe funny thing is that it is ALWAYS a Democrat who lodges the request to substitute elecotrs - but they never get the necessary support from other legislators.

THIS time there were SEVERAL GOP legislators ready to make objections to seating particular electors - and had alternate electors ready to submit.

HOWEVER, just moments before they could proceed to this phase of the NORMAL process, there happened to be this 'insurrection' that conveniently (for Nancy Pelosi) allowed the Speaker of the House to declare they have to go to SPECIAL PROCEDURES and SKIP the 'objection phase' -

How CONVENIENT for the DEMOCRATs - they get to just IGNORE the massive amount of normal procedures THIS time -

In other words, this 'insurrection' just removed ANY chance of LEGALLY challenging the electors as has happened at EVERY OTHER election where it was the DEMOCRATs offering the alternate electors.

How convenient indeed. And brought to you by the efforts of a few Democrats plants embedded within the massive group of PEACEFUL protesters there to show SUPPORT for the GOP legislators in the NORMAL process.

What was ABNORMAL this time was the ABSENCE of that part of the NORMAL process were members of congress can offer alternate electors for consideration.

What was ABNORMAL was that THIS time the GOP actually HAD alternate electors to present - but they were NOT allowed to get to that portion of the proceeding because of the "insurrection" - and JUST IN TIME --- in another minute, it would have been in process.

But that nasty "insurrection" stopped ALL procedures and the congress never got the chance to LEGALLY challenge the result of that OBVIOUSLY fraudulent election.

Therefore, the "insurrectionists" STOPPED the process they were "insurrecting" to achieve. === makes zero sense.

Especially when in retrospect it is OBVIOUS to any rational observer that the 2020 election REALLY WAS stolen - and we actually have been living under a INSURRECTION regime for the past 3 years.

No way that degenerate piece of garbage Joe Biden got "81000000 votes" but had to rely on special circumstances in 5 separate locations to squeak by with 30,000 votes under 'late night counting sessions with NO supervision' in a process that trashed DOZENS of established legal procedures.

Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27032 posts
Posted on 9/16/24 at 1:52 am to
quote:

Democrats are not the only people who saw exactly what happened on January 6


You going to try and pretend unarmed people were going to overthrow this country?

quote:

and what Trump’s responsibility for it was


Considering Trump told the crowd to march peacefully, he's 110% in the clear.

quote:

ndependents and moderates saw it too.


Saw what? An insurrection? Trump's never been charged with anything of the sort, and you know if they could they would have.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram