- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TikTokers are using AI to translate Hitler speeches
Posted on 9/26/24 at 6:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 9/26/24 at 6:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Indeed.
Sounds like they are learning it themselves, from the source.
The problem being, they've been told for 80+ years Hitler's public personna was that of a raving lunatic screaming obtuse blether at his audience. Now they see those characterizations were an overt misrepresentation. So the unfortunate extension is, "If they lied to us about that, maybe they lied to us about Hitler being evil."
Just as ... if they lied to us about the Covid vax, maybe they lied to us about all vaccines.
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 6:45 am
0
Posted on 9/26/24 at 6:50 am to Seldom Seen
Wait till they do Lincoln
Posted on 9/26/24 at 6:52 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
set to well-known music on the platform called Drift Phonk without permission,
In a story about Hitler, some shite-stain "artist" is concerned with copyright.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 7:01 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
TikTokers are using AI to translate Hitler speeches
quote:
Users have pushed and even celebrated the Nazi leader’s remarks in what is an apparent violation of TikTok’s guidelines that ban “promoting (including any praise, celebration, or sharing of manifesto) or providing material support to … individuals who cause serial or mass violence, or promote hateful ideologies.”
Let's not think Trump won't fall under this one day. Fricking snowflake leftie democrats.
I bet they won't cause a stink over Stalin's, Marx, Mao, Che, etc getting their speeches translated b
Posted on 9/26/24 at 7:03 am to MLSter
In the history books, the good guys always win.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 7:26 am to notsince98
quote:and nothing says "I'm only protecting myself" like invading another country and genociding a race.
Hitler's number 1 priority was protecting Germany
Posted on 9/26/24 at 8:41 am to notsince98
quote:Negative.
Hitler's number 1 priority was protecting Germany and germans from outside interventionists looking to undermine the country.
But that was the yarn he effectively spun, and it's damn important to realize why he could spin it.
Unfortunately, after being lied to for their entire lives, people are hearing for the first time what sounds to be a rational man, presenting reasonable thoughts, and some will reflexively conclude "Hitler wasn't so bad."
Posted on 9/26/24 at 8:43 am to evil cockroach
quote:The tell was Barbarossa. Until then, Hitler could spin everything on reclaiming land and resources stolen by Versailles.
invading another country
Posted on 9/26/24 at 8:52 am to evil cockroach
quote:
and nothing says "I'm only protecting myself" like invading another country and genociding a race.
He chose bad methods for his laudable goal.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 8:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The tell was Barbarossa. Until then, Hitler could spin everything on reclaiming land and resources stolen by Versailles.
The passage of the Enabling Act after the Reichstag fire was a pretty big tell too.
Everyone should be alarmed when a politician consolidates power into a single person or small cabinet.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 9:09 am to RollTide1987
How is it wrong, then?
Posted on 9/26/24 at 9:14 am to NC_Tigah
Barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike against a Soviet invasion of Europe. Remember, Stalin had already invaded Finland, Poland, the Baltic states, and was demanding to put troops into Romania, who was allied with Germany.
Stalin had also planned to allow Germany to fight a long, drawn out war against the Allies and for both to be weakened, then attack with the massive Red Army.
Stalin had also planned to allow Germany to fight a long, drawn out war against the Allies and for both to be weakened, then attack with the massive Red Army.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 9:32 am to Lord of the Hogs
Did anyone else invade Poland before 1941?
trying to think here.
It’s like Stalin got half of it and someone else got the other half.
it was such an even split it was almost like they made a deal or something.
trying to think here.
It’s like Stalin got half of it and someone else got the other half.
it was such an even split it was almost like they made a deal or something.
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 9:54 am
Posted on 9/26/24 at 9:37 am to TrueTiger
quote:
He chose bad methods for his laudable goal.
Think if Hitler had the transportation means of today back then. Australia would have Jew tunnels from Brisbane to Perth.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 9:55 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Did anyone else I be are Poland before 1941?
Autocorrect thing obviously, but could you redo the question?
Posted on 9/26/24 at 10:05 am to MLSter
quote:
Dude, we relied on the history books for the last 50 years and it was pure propaganda. Why did i never see a transcript? never see subtitles? i was told he was ranting crazy mean old man...... but those transcripts sound very rational. Also sounds very similar to what i am seeing in todays America. really makes you think.
What schools did you go to? That’s not how Hitler was taught in my schools. We learned about how ww2 was essentially an extension of ww1 (treaty of Versailles) and the issues in Germany that allowed Hitler to rise to power. His skill as a persuasive orator was always acknowledged.
What I don’t get is how people here are failing to understand Hitler’s speeches within their historical context - they’re propaganda. His words are chosen for a reason, primarily to manipulate and gather support for his desires. They may or may not reflect his true beliefs. It’s what he needed to tell the German population to get what he wanted. I see the same with how Putin’s speeches are accepted as gospel as well. It’s crazy how easy some people are to manipulate.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 10:06 am to SammyTiger
DP
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/26/24 at 10:09 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Did anyone else invade Poland before 1941?
trying to think here.
It’s like Stalin got half of it and someone else got the other half.
it was such an even split it was almost like they made a deal or something.
The very same Poland the allies went to war over?!? Surely not. If the Soviets had invaded Poland Winston Churchill would have definitely declared war on the Soviets! Because that is why they went to war with Germany!
Poland’s sovereignty is sacred, it’s why the war was fought, and it’s why after the war the allies allowed Poland to become the most free and prosperous democracy in the world
Posted on 9/26/24 at 10:20 am to OBReb6
Different discussion. Saying Hitler invaded Russia because Russia invaded Poland is making excuses for Hitler.
But yeah, Hitler invading Poland First and being a neighbor of France put them way higher in England and France’s priority list.
They had already declared war on Germany when Russia invaded.
But yeah, Hitler invading Poland First and being a neighbor of France put them way higher in England and France’s priority list.
They had already declared war on Germany when Russia invaded.
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 10:23 am
Posted on 9/26/24 at 10:22 am to SammyTiger
You’ve got me confused buddy
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News