- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thune says not enough votes for Recess?
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:39 pm to rwestmore7
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:39 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
How many times do I have to post the same shite because people cant read?
You can also point out that out of all the presidents who have done this out of Clinton, W, and Obama, only one of those appointments were made in any of their first years in office. People are ignoring that this was not done for department heads.
This post was edited on 11/15/24 at 3:41 pm
0
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:41 pm to rwestmore7
‘What the founders meant’
Look at the big brain on Brent
If the founders supplied loopholes, then that’s what the founders meant
Gtfo with your pretend purist bs
Look at the big brain on Brent
If the founders supplied loopholes, then that’s what the founders meant
Gtfo with your pretend purist bs
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:42 pm to VCeagle2013
quote:
follower of Jesus who votes blue. My mission in life is to take back Jesus from the people (the religious right) who have hi-jacked Him! Pro Choice, BLM! USA
How do you people even find shite like this.
Poor dog.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:44 pm to Padme
So, are you arguing that loopholes in the Constitution are intentional and meant to be exploited, regardless of their impact on governance? I’m not claiming to be a purist, just pointing out that the "advice and consent" clause was designed to ensure checks and balances. Using recess appointments to bypass a lack of Senate approval undermines that process and shifts power away from what was intended as a collaborative effort.
If we rely on exploiting loopholes rather than addressing issues within the system, aren’t we just inviting further erosion of the checks and balances the founders aimed to protect?
If we rely on exploiting loopholes rather than addressing issues within the system, aren’t we just inviting further erosion of the checks and balances the founders aimed to protect?
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:44 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
Do you believe it should be changed back for the next president?
The problem with your question is you assume this is changing anything. Sure, it's not typical, but that doesn't make it illegal.
No one should have any doubt about whether or not Democrats will use this. They have and will. People only seem to care about "norms" when they're trying to halt an America-first agenda.
You're transparent. We all know you're not a conservative and are not interested in preserving freedom. It is great news that you lost.
This post was edited on 11/15/24 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:45 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
Good, we shouldn't change the norm of confirming department heads because Trump is a cry baby and wants things done his way.
quote:how was your trip?
Jwho77
You should probably plan a 4-year internet vacation starting in January. It's best for your health.
Posted by rwestmore7
9/12/24 at 2:34 pm to
Bookmarking this to come back in November
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:45 pm to VCeagle2013
76 million votes not enough?!
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:56 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
You should probably plan a 4-year internet vacation starting in January. It's best for your health.
I'm still here
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:57 pm to Revelator
The article on the Supreme Court decision says. "However, in a majority opinion that infuriated conservative critics of the president, the supreme court simultaneously endorsed a broad interpretation of the circumstances in which a president can invoke the clause to appoint government officials without consulting the Senate."
Posted on 11/15/24 at 3:57 pm to rwestmore7
Did you misplace your bookmark? Glad to help
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:12 pm to rwestmore7
But is it also exploitative for Congress to refuse to perform its duties as a simply a way to thwart a president and his administration?
I say Trump, after a set time, close all departments that lack leadership until those posts are filled.
I say Trump, after a set time, close all departments that lack leadership until those posts are filled.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:18 pm to Average_Comments
You didn't read your Link. They rebuked yet did nothing. Those appointments kept their positions.
You progressives possess the brains of a 3day old Obama turd.
You progressives possess the brains of a 3day old Obama turd.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:22 pm to Houag80
The fight is in Jan not now. we should all hold our fire until it comes to be the right time.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:25 pm to JimEverett
He did not.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:25 pm to FreddieMac
That's fine. My point still stands. Progressives have no substance.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:25 pm to rwestmore7
quote:
Good, we shouldn't change the norm of confirming department heads because Trump is a cry baby and wants things done his way
Talk about cry baby!!! LMAO
Trump won and should be allowed to pick his team. To the winner go the spoils.
I find it amazing and amusing how folks still doubt Trump. Mind boggling!!!
Time after time, he wins against all odds!!!!
We elected Trump to get our nation back on the right track and that's what he's going to do.
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:26 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:29 pm to VCeagle2013
Oh no, There is a way and it will be done and George Washington will cross the river on those too!
Posted on 11/15/24 at 4:30 pm to Jjdoc
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/15/24 at 4:33 pm
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News