- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:53 am to Dday63
quote:
What is funny is you trying to pretend there wasn’t intentional fraud and/or abuse of the system.
quote:
I've never said there wasn't.
quote:
We need to work towards fixing inherent flaws, but that does not mean there was intentional fraud or abuse of the system. It's just a flawed system
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:55 am to Dday63
quote:
I'm a contrarian, which this board obviously cannot handle.

Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:55 am to TigerB8
quote:
There were ballots with no signature verification.
There were ballots with no chain of custody.
There were ballots that were mailed in but were not folded nor on the correct ballot paper
There were ballots created out of thin air during a hand recount
There were duplicate ballots that were counted
There were ballots that were found to be massed produced with the oval filled in perfectly like a laser printer.
There were ballots that were found to have the exact same Write in candidate with exact same handwriting match.
There were drop boxes that did not have any video footage even though required by law.
"Muh NO PROOF!!!" "NO FRAUD!" "BIG LIE!" "OMB!" "BAD CANDIDATE!"

Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:56 am to BBONDS25
Have you seen the recent weekly voter registration reports coming out of Texas? Hundreds of thousands of new registrations per week with at least half of them having non-matched names/ss# or confirmed dead.
But there's no fraud people. Its all just a #biglie
But there's no fraud people. Its all just a #biglie
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:56 am to ronricks
Kemp was the better uniparty/Deep State operative. That's why.
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:06 am to BBONDS25
quote:
quote:
We need to work towards fixing inherent flaws, but that does not mean there was intentional fraud or abuse of the system. It's just a flawed system
oh my.

Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:25 am to Dday63
quote:
It's just a flawed system (I'm not saying there wasn't fraud, I'm saying flaws in the system don't prove fraud)
And I’m saying that flaws in the system that do not mitigate fraud lead to incredible results. Fraud doesn’t have to be proven, this is a court of public opinion, not a court of law.
quote:
And you would think someone would have looked into this since the issue was raised in 2020, and we have had elections since then. I suspect the answer is out there.
This is the topic at hand.
quote:
Quick aside, I don't know what you are referencing as never wanting to come back to.
Pay attention this time.
quote:
Um, that question was asked and answered a long time ago. The law does not require the poll workers to wait on the poll watchers.
The law is not the same as the control environment. They let the mitigating control walk out. Whether it is against the law, and whether it produced credible results are different issues.
Similar to various ethical bodies that exist to regulate professions and industries, the standards set can be violated and punished, outside of any laws that exist (outside of laws that allow those bodies to do so at their discretion).
quote:
That is a weird assumption you have made about me that is totally off base.
It’s not an assumption, it’s an observation based on the apparent dissonance you have in accepting the points made above.
quote:
But this board sees a tweet and declares Trump the true president. I ask if there are any details, but I'm the one who lacks critical thinking?
Please listen: claiming the results are not credible, or illegitimate, is not the same as claiming the alternative result is the actual result.
There are people that fall into a similar fallacy, that jump straight to the conclusion that if they don’t believe the results, then the opposite of what was reported is true. You arent wrong in that regard.
But when you have one side that is actively overriding the controls, its not off base to assume that the results are fraudulent. The appearance of fraud is functionally the same as actual fraud.
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 11:30 am
Posted on 4/4/24 at 12:52 pm to dgnx6
quote:
That dude is a typical hypocrite liberal who writes out long posts without saying anything and pats himself on the back for being a goose stepper.
Like sfp does
Removed the edit

Popular
Back to top
