Started By
Message
locked post

This board deserves to see the Tucker Carlson -John Bolton interview from two weeks ago

Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:19 pm
Posted by JakeScott
Lake Lanier
Member since Oct 2015
695 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:19 pm
The last minute is must see TV.
This post was edited on 3/25/18 at 4:23 pm
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83933 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:20 pm to
Wow it got nasty at the end.
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:21 pm to
How about a synopsis you retard.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83933 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:21 pm to
I will say most people are saying Bolton got owned but I think he handled himself relatively well considering.
This post was edited on 3/22/18 at 7:22 pm
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22373 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:22 pm to
The Tuck doesn't like John Bolton.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4315 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:24 pm to
LINK

Should be where most people want to watch.

Tucker goes pretty hard on the overthrow and invasion of Iraq. Bolton still thinks it was a good idea.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

the look on Bolton's face at the end of the interview is priceless.


people will be disappointed.

Link the whole thing, it is only 5 minutes.

Of course everything each said was very reasonable.
Posted by Quaker
Member since Mar 2018
304 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:29 pm to
Hahah 2 min in and he’s already saying weapons of mass destruction.

Holy fricking shite he said the strengthing of Iran was not because of the overthrow of Saddam but rather the withdrawal of us troops in 2011. Also said overthrowing saddam was unequivocally a resounding success.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260401 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

How about a synopsis you retard.


Are you always this bitchy?
Posted by eyepooted
Member since Jul 2010
5717 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:30 pm to
I don’t have a better alternative but I’m not real fond of Bolton as NSA
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Holy fricking shite he said the strengthing of Iran was not because of the overthrow of Saddam but rather the withdrawal of us troops in 2011. Also said overthrowing saddam was unequivocally a resounding success.


Both demonstrably true.

We won the war and lost the peace. The vacuum left by our withdrawal allowed the stronger nations to carve up and dominate Iraq.

When you destroy a country, you sign up for a Japan WWII era rebuild. I hoe we learned this lesson and do not jump in anywhere rashly.

The Bush team dropped the ball and Obama failed to cover it.
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:44 pm to
Tucker Carlson is an idiot. He's like a lot of idiots on message boards like this one that criticizes a NFL QB for example, because they watched the NFL QB throw a INT in a game on TV or lose a game.

Meanwhile, the idiot NFL QB is making millions playing in the NFL in actual games, while the idiot that criticized him is still sitting on that couch on his fat arse watching a game on TV.....

Bolton may not be very good at his job at making foreign policy decisions, but Tucker Carlson will never get any closer to actually making any PERIOD, than where he sits right now: reading shite off of a teleprompter.....
Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Both demonstrably true.

We won the war and lost the peace. The vacuum left by our withdrawal allowed the stronger nations to carve up and dominate Iraq.

When you destroy a country, you sign up for a Japan WWII era rebuild. I hoe we learned this lesson and do not jump in anywhere rashly.

The Bush team dropped the ball and Obama failed to cover it.


The shite that is going on with Iran, Iraq, Syria, Israel, etc. is the result of thousands of years of tribal feuding and fanatical religious conflict. Anyone thinking a war with Iran OR Iraq will have impact one way or the other in the region are simply delusional.

The only way to truly end the turmoil in the Middle East is to wipe all the countries clean. But that would also include Saudi Arabia and Egypt as well....
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4315 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Tucker Carlson is an idiot


In this scenario you've created can't we just replace some names and suddenly...

quote:

Tucker Carlson is

quote:

making millions


quote:

while the idiot that criticized him is still sitting on that couch on his fat arse watching

quote:

Tucker Carlson


Does that mean you aren't in a position to criticize Tucker?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

The shite that is going on with Iran, Iraq, Syria, Israel, etc. is the result of thousands of years of tribal feuding and fanatical religious conflict.


This is nonsense and it's not true. In the same time period, the Ottoman and Persians (who were the major powers in the region until the 19th and 20th century) fought six less wars than the British and French (15 vs 9), yet we don't use that historical animus as an explanation for major political events right now. The fall of the Ottoman Empire, the Sykes-Picot treaty, and the failure of major social and political movements created the situation we see now. Between 1948 and 2003, the region saw something like 50 armed conflicts, which ended in the death of around 2.5 million people. Since 2003, there have been something like 25 armed conflicts that have killed just as many people.

You have to be willfully dishonest to look at the course of West Asian history and reduce it to "they were always killing each other." It's nonsense. The GDP of the area was higher with the Ottomans in power than it was in 1991 (I can't remember the exact dates). In addition, the traditional powers of the region like Turkey and Iran have only recently begun to grow more wealthy (in Turkey's case) and are extending their arms into areas of historical influence. What started that opening of access in earnest was the fall of Iraq in 2003. Subsequent events compounded it, but it's hard to say that 2003 wasn't a watershed moment.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:01 pm to
2007:

Tucker Thinks Iraq War is Ok if its for Oil

2003:

CARLSON: But has it occurred to you that the White House has a huge amount of information that the rest of us don't have... ?

Tucker is okay with Iraq invasion because the president might have more information than the rest of us know and then it's egregious to say that it's for oil

This a-hole isn't a patriot he's just a mouthpiece who will say anything that he thinks that you idiots will believe
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:05 pm to
He said the fall of Saddaam didn't make Iran stronger, it was the removal of US troops in 2011. This is the height of insanity.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16726 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:07 pm to
Posted this in another thread. Thought I should drop it here too.



Just read that Bolton predicted the Kim Jong Un meeting with Trump would fail and lead to military action.

This is exactly why you pick Bolton and you pick him now. NK has to believe this is their last and only chance.

This hire might be nothing more than a chess move by Trump to ensure success of the NOKO talks.

I wouldn't be surprised if this is the primary reason he's hired - this and maybe Iran. And once both situations are addressed, he's gone.

This post was edited on 3/22/18 at 8:09 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

The vacuum left by our withdrawal allowed the stronger nations to carve up and dominate Iraq.


Yes, a vacuum that existed only because we took out Saddam. That's why he's completely wrong when he said the removal of Saddam didn't empower Iran. According to his theory, the only way to keep Iran in check in the region is to permanently station troops in Iraq.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 3/22/18 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

You have to be willfully dishonest to look at the course of West Asian history and reduce it to "they were always killing each other."


Or just plain ignorant.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram