Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

There needs to be a constitutional Amendment limiting the duration of Emergency powers

Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:26 am
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:26 am
Frankly, I don't know how we overlooked this problem in the first place. I guess that's what happens when you forget that Politicians are scum.

But, by definition, Emergency powers are for Emergencies and they exist because you need some mechanism for leaders to be able to act where timeliness makes legislating it untenable.

In no universe does that definition describe a two year fricking window. Honestly, I'm stunned we haven't run into this problem before now that we see how easily misused it is.

In my view, Emergency powers should have no more than 30 days duration that CANNOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES be extended unless by legislative act and then, MUST be renewed every 30 days.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6030 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:30 am to
I agree with you. It's insane that governors/mayors can grant themselves unlimited power under an emergency, and they are the ones who can declare an emergency without any criteria surrounding it and it lasts as long as they want.

In polite society we call that dictatorship.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
46559 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:32 am to
No, we don’t need that. What a lot of us, who are against the mandates, don’t concede is that they were popular with the majority of Americans. If the majority was against them they would have been revoked. The system worked fine; it was the voters who malfunctioned.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:33 am to
quote:


No, we don’t need that. What a lot of us, who are against the mandates, don’t concede is that they were popular with the majority of Americans
Fine, then pass legislation.

quote:

If the majority was against them they would have been revoked
LOL, that's not how shite works at all. Come on.

Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
69665 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:33 am to
One of the arguments the left had in the scotus mandate case was it was an emergency health crisis.

Two years into this charade I felt like they were arguing against themselves, but I have common sense
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:35 am to
quote:

I agree with you. It's insane that governors/mayors can grant themselves unlimited power under an emergency, and they are the ones who can declare an emergency without any criteria surrounding it and it lasts as long as they want.

Yes. That's another thing.

IF we're going to have Emergency powers, they can't fricking extend to every Tom Dick and Harry who has been elected to an executive position. ESPECIALLY not to the point where the fricking mayor of some town of 2000 people can say, "yeah, frick you governor, we're keeping our dictatorship"
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:35 am to
quote:

One of the arguments the left had in the scotus mandate case was it was an emergency health crisis.

Two years into this charade I felt like they were arguing against themselves, but I have common sense
Exactly.

Every last person in Congress has voiced an opinion.

fricking vote on that shite you spineless monkeys.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Two years into this charade I felt like they were arguing against themselves, but I have common sense

Hell, they probably WIN the mandate in court if they'd passed legislation mandating it.
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2870 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:37 am to
“Emergency powers” isn’t in the constitution to begin with.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 11:38 am to
quote:

“Emergency powers” isn’t in the constitution to begin with.

Yeah

Left to me, there'd would be no such thing but, I'm willing to compromise.

Frankly, in the year 2022, there's no reason why "emergency" powers should last more than a few days.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
46559 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Fine, then pass legislation.

How in the world can you pass legislation making what was popular illegal?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

How in the world can you pass legislation making what was popular illegal?

Um, my point was, if it's so damned popular, then you pass LEGISLATION for what you want to do. You don't just leave the power in the hands of one person. That's the silly part.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 12:31 pm to
Each State has to fix their own issues.

It took nearly 2 years for Democrats to finally realize that Jay Inslee can't run for a 4th term and if somehow a Republican wins in 2024, that person can act like an emperor the same way Stupid Jay does.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

It took nearly 2 years for Democrats to finally realize that Jay Inslee can't run for a 4th term and if somehow a Republican wins in 2024, that person can act like an emperor the same way Stupid Jay does.

Totalitarians figuring out that they ONLY want themselves to be allowed to be totalitarian is of marginal solace.
Posted by TexasTigers512
Member since Oct 2021
304 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 1:17 pm to
I agree. Every year it gets worse and worse. They just keep going further and further abusing powers.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
60882 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

In my view, Emergency powers should have no more than 30 days duration that CANNOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES be extended unless by legislative act and then, MUST be renewed every 30 days.



This
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2870 posts
Posted on 1/23/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Yeah Left to me, there'd would be no such thing but, I'm willing to compromise. Frankly, in the year 2022, there's no reason why "emergency" powers should last more than a few days.


I don’t disagree with the fact that it is needed. Ideally instead of letting the judicial branch allow its existence and the executive test the limits constantly we would establish clear parameters for its use in a constitutional amendment. We all know that is a tall order, especially in today’s polarized state.
This post was edited on 1/23/22 at 2:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram