re: There is not the first bit of legit evidence that anyone was shot in the Capitol Building

quote:

---

This entire thread is some sort of lark or parody, right?

---

you wish.

see 2020reVision above.

thread is to give cover to the seditious conspirators and those drawn in.

thread is Nothing to see here.

dont you love the use of Ukrainians, decorated veterans of war?

combines the Putin supporters and the seditious conspirators in one thread.

quote:

---

you wish.

see 2020reVision above.

thread is to give cover to the seditious conspirators and those drawn in.

thread is Nothing to see here.

dont you love the use of Ukrainians, decorated veterans of war?

combines the Putin supporters and the seditious conspirators in one thread.

---

literally the most stupid poster on tigerdroppings.

accurately defined as one who supports an actual color revolution perpetrated on your own country

Did your neighbors dog tell you the best interpretation of the film?

quote:

---

I posted the guy's credentials in this thread already.
Here's his licensing info:

---

quote:

---

So it seems your contention about Harris being a member of Antifa is not only false. It is 180° from the truth.

---

I never claimed the doctor was a member of antifa. He was in the same location which was likely guarded/restricted entry of antifa.

I wouldnt be surprised if he was, but you REALLY need to watch out for your kneejerk reactions that you rapidly turn into "observations" mistakenly.

I find it very odd that you also are making a big to do of the guy at all:

1. He is not shown doing anything to take care of the actor.

2. He is in the middle of dozens of antifa.

3. He was arrested on Friday for a process/tresspass charge

4. using photography of a WELL KNOWN antifa activist among dozens of similar antifa activists.

5. He allegedly wrote "the violent siege was in fact a “false flag event” carried out by “Antifa dressed up like Trump supporters,” with a goal to bring about “even more oppression of conservatives.”

The shown text indicates the truth about the perpetration of the color revolution that needed an event IN THE CAPITOL big enough to SHUT DOWN THE CAPITOL and all the evidence of massive election fraud and tampering by the color revolutionists who perpetrated their color revolution against the USA. He could be coached in his role.

6. How far into the acted false flag this guy we have learned of since FRIDAY - yes TWO FCKG days ago - is suspicious beyond reason. Its reporting source making it even moreso. and how soon are we to investigations by Republicans?

7. I am not sure why you are so dense here:

quote:

---

What difference would it make to the MSM narrative if Ashli Babbitt had not been murdered on J6. NOT A DAMN THING! NOTHING! They already had their "J6 death"

---

As has been said repeatedly, they needed a J6 death INSIDE the Capitol to shut down any presentation of evidence.

It also shows you are getting unreasonably riled.

The only guaranteed way to get that was to use their color revolution partners, the antifa crisis actors HOAXING a reason to shut the Capitol down

SO THAT THEY COULD CEMENT THEIR EFFORTS TO SEAL THEIR COLOR REVOLUTION.


Dont let the assassination of 1963 dispute and your lack of forensic understanding make you blind to truth in other CIA actions 60 years later.

Again, surprised that anyone would be surprised that the leaders of the revolution would bolster their deceptions. The whole thing is NOTHING BUT DECEPTION. I believe this will show the same. There is a pertinent question that I want to see answered at some point.

You have amazingly weak observational and critical thinking skills.

You miss the point as much as I have ever seen

quote:

---

quote:
the coup attempt.
The coup attempt was successful. The coup was the stolen election.

J6 was about Pence refusing to take advantage of Constitutional and procedural ambiguity, and press the matter to the House. In the House, an inquiry of electoral corruption could have been forced.

---

This is very succinct - I have been trying in vain to describe the situation so clearly.



edit - "this" is the concise description of the effort

quote:

---

The only guaranteed way to get that was to use their color revolution partners, the antifa crisis actors HOAXING a reason to shut the Capitol down

SO THAT THEY COULD CEMENT THEIR EFFORTS TO SEAL THEIR COLOR REVOLUTION.

---

+1

4D Chess theory.

I approve.

NONE of any of that day's chaotic confusion, events, cast members, characters, roles, nonsensical "cooperation" and theater -- including the POST-theater op & narrative -- make any sense whatsoever OTHER THAN how you've parsed it.

It's far too much mental & emotional work for most people to care enough to piece things all together. Again, excellent effort.

quote:

---

It's far too much mental & emotional work for most people to care enough to piece things all together. Again, excellent effort

---

To do so, in this case, distorts the reality bubble they (most people) live in and to challenge one's own belief system jeopardizes their belief systems in total, leading to utter the destruction of their mentality if they cannot restructure what to believe in. It's a human condition and no trivial matter.

It is just like "The Matrix". People content with going about their everyday lives are going to fight against any outside notion that are not in control of their own individual reality.

quote:

---

Constitutional and procedural ambiguity

---

quote:

---

There is nothing in the Constitution that allows for that.

---

Look up the definition of 'ambiguity'

and how much legislation has been passed just in the last 50 years that is totally dedicated to the 'ambiguity' in the constitution.

For instance
- point out where the constitution 'allows' for the legislature to tax me to pay for the livelihood of some hoodrat who refuses to get a job and take care of himself - and to take care of his bastard children and to pay increased insurance to pay for the damages he causes in his illegal activities, and to use some undefined 'systemic racism' condition that has never been found anywhere to let him out of jail to continue his rampages.
- and there are literally hundreds of other 'constitutionally ambiguous' actions that the government has taken to lessen the quality of life for those who DO follow the precepts and 'assumptions' that were the basis of our constitution. Those 'assumptions' being that the constitution was written for governance of a 'religious and moral population.'

SO - what is so 'ambiguous' about ensuring that the actual precepts of the constitution MUST be followed when voting for POTUS - for example:
= there is no provision for state executives to change the way elections are conducted and administered without the approval of that state's legislature. All of the 'contested' electors were the result of highly suspicious changes to election procedure that was rammed thru by state executives and state courts - and not one of them were in accordance with what the state legislatures had proscribed.
= and there is no lack of precedents for US legislative challenges to seating those electors - DEMOCRAT activists like Shiela Jackson lee and maxine waters have made a career out of challenging every election that didn't go the way Democrats wanted. and all without citing ANY 'constitutional' misapplication.

SO - tell us what your reasoning is for challenging such a reasonable statement as mentioning 'constitutional ambiguity.'

quote:

---

It's also human nature to just keep peeling away at that same onion...

---

Until Agent Smith arrives and doesn't end well for anyone.