Posted by
Michigan Fan
Member since Dec 2020
1371 posts

re: There is not the first bit of legit evidence that anyone was shot in the Capitol Building


revisionist propaganda.

chirren, how you know this one is a liar: its been two years and the defense of the attempted coup failed to ID any Ukraine soldiers.
not one. see the video. see the photos.

not one.


ps. dont you just love that in this storytime revelation the Ukrainians are "decorated" doldiers!. these were not just any bilingual spy soldiers.

Sorry sunshine, but there was no attempted coup...other than the one perpetuated by the left & non-Trumpers that began 7 years ago.

Not one...
"see the video" What video?
"see the photos" What photos?
Not one...
Who, specifically, has set out to, but failed to ID any Ukrainian soldiers?

Since I only have to present one in order to destroy your rather juvenile post, I'll give you one even a cretinous loser, namely you, can digest.

Meet Sergei Dybynyn, a Ukrainian Nationalist & member of Pravy Sektor, a Neo-Fascist/Neo-Nazi group that operates much like & coordinates with the AZOV Battalion. He received a medal from Poroshenko for his "destructive" activities in the Donbas region & has multiple warrants for his arrest issued by the Luhansk People's Republic.
You'll see him pictured with Ruslan Smeshuk in Donetsk in 2014, the 2 of them showing off their medals, & each in different the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021. You might happen to recognize another fake...I mean, face with the horns just above it.
So, you'll be completely out of ammo & shooting blanks as soon as you begin what's sure to be a futile, Celtic Mutt-like attempt to say this guy is neither a UA soldier, nor decorated.

"not one"...
Can you count to "one"? If so, GFY one more time.

p.s. Don't you just love that?

Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Member since Sep 2003
116039 posts

re: There is not the first bit of legit evidence that anyone was shot in the Capitol Building


Constitutional and procedural ambiguity
There is nothing in the Constitution that allows for that.

The Electoral Count Act of 1887

SEC. 4. That Congress shall be in session on the second Wednesday in February succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of one o'clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in vote the alphabetical order of the States ...
The Election Act of 1887 was passed in response to procedural concerns arising from the other stolen election in our nation's history -- the election of 1876. There were, and are, legitimate questions regarding its Constitutionality. However, those have never been raised in the courts. Therefore the 1887 ECA was law on J6.

"to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate" is the some of the more problematic phraseology in the act.

Your claim that "there is nothing in the Constitution that allows for that" is as true as the claim there is nothing in the Constitution allowing for the ECA itself. However, as the ECA was operational law on J6, so was the ambiguity in it.

IAW the ECA of 1887, certificates can only be presented to the tellers after they are opened by the POTS (VPOTUS). There was no technical requirement for the POTS to open envelopes containing them.

Unfortunately, TDS prevented Dems and RINO's alike from presenting the nuance to Americans and ADMITTING Trump was technically right, but then outlining why they would not abide his requests. Instead, they claimed he was crazy.

That was, of course, a baldfaced lie. There was a loophole, and millions of Americans recognized it. Given that reality, Democrat/MSM lies weren't just isolated lies. They were lies designed to inflame and instigate actions which could then be miscategorized as "an insurrection."

As evidence of the lies, Congress passed the "Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022" to close loopholes which the lying MSM, lying Dems, and lying RINOs claimed never existed in the first place.


You've been lied to.
You were naive enough to believe the lies even in the face of factual incongruence.
You are misinformed as a result.
This post was edited on 1/30 at 5:34 am

Replies (0)
Replies (0)
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.