
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:26 am to RFK
quote:
doubt it would have been difficult to locate his house without this publishing.
Could probably look it up in the phone book or public records.
Not that easy at all, first you have to find the name of the trust, which bought it most likely. Probably created a trust just for the house.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:27 am to Flats
quote:
Ok, you can't hazard a guess as to WHY they published an aerial photo of his house? That's either really common and they do it all the time for public figures or it was deliberate. I can only think of one reason to deliberately publicize where he lives; it's a nudge for the crazies. Do you have another possibility?
Have you read the story? I haven’t. I’m just not willing to jump to “the WSJ wanted to nudge the crazies”. I’m not saying that it’s not possible, but maybe there was another reason.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:32 am to uggabugga
Wall Street Journal is a left-wing rag at this point
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:33 am to RFK
quote:
Could probably look it up in the phone book or public records.
Don’t be a fool. Anyone wanting to hide their domicile can do so by using an LLC or other entity to purchase the home. I’m not suggesting that someone with a nation’s treasury behind them could not eventually find it, but you and I couldn’t.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:34 am to jrobic4
quote:
Wall Street Journal is a left-wing rag at this point
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:34 am to Robot Santa
quote:
The WSJ, well known leftist rag.
The non editorial page part has been leftist for years you fricking moron
This board is now full of dumbasses.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:36 am to uggabugga
quote:
One of the reasons I had to move is because the WSJ printed a PHOTO OF MY HOUSE the DAY I bought it that has GEO-LOCATE on it! In a highly irresponsible way, the editor, we PLEADED with her NOT to print the location of my house, she DID ANYWAY." ?
Still a very not cool move and I wouldn't be surprised if she will be in serious legal trouble for it. Thats even assuming she wasnt intentionally exposing his families location to bad people.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:41 am to SundayFunday
An active war zone? Treason?
You people crack me up.
You people crack me up.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:41 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
This board is now full of dumbasses.
quote:
RohanGonzales
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:49 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
The non editorial page part has been leftist for years you fricking moron
I acknowledged that. Their factual reporting displays liberal bias the same way almost all factual reporting in this country does.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:02 pm to uggabugga
The WSJ is just as bad as MSNBC, CNN etc. The Fox News of print journalism. Uniparty establishment controlled opposition.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:04 pm to Robot Santa
quote:
quote:
democrats being POS
The WSJ, well known leftist rag.
It has become one... or at best a uniparty/establishment anti-Trump rag. I quit reading it years ago because of it.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:05 pm to loogaroo
That woman's photo screams "I'm a conservative."
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:07 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
You asshats around here actually believe the WSJ is a leftist publication? Jesus.
No one’s address is safe in this country, Bessent is being a bitch.
I can send you endless examples that at least prove a uniparty/establishment bias, dipshit.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:07 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
By and large, the news page is neutral,
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:14 pm to RFK
Wish somebody could send a terrorist group after your entire family after publishing where you all live.
Since you think its OK and completely for funsies and all.
Since you think its OK and completely for funsies and all.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:15 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Have you read the story? I haven’t. I’m just not willing to jump to “the WSJ wanted to nudge the crazies”.
Of course you aren't willing to say that. No one is surprised.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:15 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
An active war zone? Treason?
You people crack me up
It's okay, we all laugh at how much of a moron you are too, bud.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:17 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
By and large, the news page is neutral, which is what it should be.
Bessent called them the TMZ of financial news

Popular
Back to top


0







