Started By
Message

re: The WSJ screwed over Scott Bessent big-time

Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:15 am to
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
8541 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:15 am to
Phone book? RFK you really are a joke.
Posted by phaz
Waddell, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
7368 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:26 am to
quote:

doubt it would have been difficult to locate his house without this publishing.

Could probably look it up in the phone book or public records.


Not that easy at all, first you have to find the name of the trust, which bought it most likely. Probably created a trust just for the house.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
65852 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Ok, you can't hazard a guess as to WHY they published an aerial photo of his house? That's either really common and they do it all the time for public figures or it was deliberate. I can only think of one reason to deliberately publicize where he lives; it's a nudge for the crazies. Do you have another possibility?


Have you read the story? I haven’t. I’m just not willing to jump to “the WSJ wanted to nudge the crazies”. I’m not saying that it’s not possible, but maybe there was another reason.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
14267 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:32 am to
Wall Street Journal is a left-wing rag at this point
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
59140 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Could probably look it up in the phone book or public records.

Don’t be a fool. Anyone wanting to hide their domicile can do so by using an LLC or other entity to purchase the home. I’m not suggesting that someone with a nation’s treasury behind them could not eventually find it, but you and I couldn’t.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
65852 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Wall Street Journal is a left-wing rag at this point


Without a hint of irony.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15278 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

The WSJ, well known leftist rag.


The non editorial page part has been leftist for years you fricking moron

This board is now full of dumbasses.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 11:36 am
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10730 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:36 am to
quote:

One of the reasons I had to move is because the WSJ printed a PHOTO OF MY HOUSE the DAY I bought it that has GEO-LOCATE on it! In a highly irresponsible way, the editor, we PLEADED with her NOT to print the location of my house, she DID ANYWAY." ?




whoops I got two things mixed up. My B


Still a very not cool move and I wouldn't be surprised if she will be in serious legal trouble for it. Thats even assuming she wasnt intentionally exposing his families location to bad people.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 12:01 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
65852 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:41 am to
An active war zone? Treason?

You people crack me up.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
65852 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:41 am to
quote:

This board is now full of dumbasses.


quote:

RohanGonzales


Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
47064 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

The non editorial page part has been leftist for years you fricking moron


I acknowledged that. Their factual reporting displays liberal bias the same way almost all factual reporting in this country does.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:02 pm to
The WSJ is just as bad as MSNBC, CNN etc. The Fox News of print journalism. Uniparty establishment controlled opposition.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:


quote:
democrats being POS


The WSJ, well known leftist rag.


It has become one... or at best a uniparty/establishment anti-Trump rag. I quit reading it years ago because of it.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:05 pm to
That woman's photo screams "I'm a conservative."
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

You asshats around here actually believe the WSJ is a leftist publication? Jesus.

No one’s address is safe in this country, Bessent is being a bitch.


I can send you endless examples that at least prove a uniparty/establishment bias, dipshit.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

By and large, the news page is neutral,


Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15973 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:14 pm to
Wish somebody could send a terrorist group after your entire family after publishing where you all live.
Since you think its OK and completely for funsies and all.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Have you read the story? I haven’t. I’m just not willing to jump to “the WSJ wanted to nudge the crazies”.


Of course you aren't willing to say that. No one is surprised.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
18573 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:


An active war zone? Treason?

You people crack me up


It's okay, we all laugh at how much of a moron you are too, bud.
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3596 posts
Posted on 11/13/26 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

By and large, the news page is neutral, which is what it should be.


Bessent called them the TMZ of financial news
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram