- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Water Tower Was The High Ground
Posted on 7/20/24 at 5:59 am to TigerVespamon
Posted on 7/20/24 at 5:59 am to TigerVespamon
That water tower has a higher slope than the roof, duh!??
Posted on 7/20/24 at 6:21 am to TigerVespamon
Is there a ladder going up to the very top on the other side of the water tower?
Posted on 7/20/24 at 7:27 am to JackieTreehorn
quote:
Sure looks like someone was there in this video. Check out 7:11
Jesus Christ. You can see the camera moving from the commotion—that is what causes the video artifacts
That’s a shadow
Posted on 7/20/24 at 7:34 am to Bow08tie
quote:
There are some opinions that the two story building immediately behind the assassins position may have been a second shooter location. In your aerial photo of the two story building roofs find the more gray in color roof which would of been to the assassins right.
Apparently there are photos out that show one of the second story windows is open on the gray roof building. Sound analysis give some indication that the first series of shots were more muffled giving the notion may have originated from inside the building.
The Robert Barnes presentation offers solid, compelling support for this theory. The bullet trajectory and audio match is well done and makes a lot of sense.
From the day of the shooting I distinctly remember hearing three different sound profiles from the audio:
1st shots - muffled
2nd shots - louder, less muffled (presumably Crooks)
3rd shot - unmuffled, single shot, identified as the SS sniper that shot Crooks
My question has been …. Where did the first two shots originate if they didn’t come from Crooks or the Sniper that took the final shot?
Also, according to Bongino, there were only 3 posts that were SS, the other personnel assigned by SS were actually DHS personnel …. which raises suspicions. Particularly given Mayorkis’s directive to Cheatle to remain silent, or else ….
Link to video, showing shot diagrams:
This post was edited on 7/20/24 at 7:48 am
Posted on 7/20/24 at 7:54 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
If you’re talking about the shadow
Someone was on tower. It’s factually not a shadow despite the persistence ignorance of people claiming so.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 7:59 am to TigerVespamon
quote:
Could have positioned one of the two teams on the water tower while keeping the other in one of the behind stage positions.
If they were scared of being on a sloped roof, do you really think they would get on a water tower?
Posted on 7/20/24 at 8:05 am to TigerVespamon
quote:
Why didn't they utilize the water tower (high ground)?
Why didn't they just have someone up on the AGR building, under a tent if need be...
Posted on 7/20/24 at 8:07 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Someone was on tower. It’s factually not a shadow despite the persistence ignorance of people claiming so.
Oh, okay, you’re just an idiot. Carry on.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 8:10 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
Oh, okay, you’re just an idiot. Carry on.
Uncovering truths isn’t in you buddy. That’s okay. America needs sheep too to operate in a way.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 8:58 am to ugasickem
quote:I’m so sorry you are stupid.
That water tower has a higher slope than the roof, duh!??
Posted on 7/20/24 at 8:59 am to TigerVespamon
quote:
I’m so sorry you are stupid.
big foot was on top
Posted on 7/20/24 at 9:01 am to TigerVespamon
The videos they are using claim a sniper was on top of water tower. Not the catwalk.
This post was edited on 7/20/24 at 9:02 am
Posted on 7/20/24 at 9:04 am to dkreller
quote:
I still don’t understand how the bullet is so low in that photo taken from a low vantage point.
What do you mean?
Posted on 7/20/24 at 9:11 am to TigerVespamon
quote:
TigerVespamon
Before calling me stupid, you half a blow job frick, at least educate yourself on your side of the argument you obviously blindly accept.
After that, buy a sarcasm detector you poor dim witted bastard.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 9:33 am to the808bass
quote:
What do you mean?
If that pictures includes the bullet that hit his ear, it seems the bullet would appear to be slightly higher than his ear since the picture is taken from below.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 10:45 am to dkreller
Oh. That’s a different dumb idea than the dumb idea I thought you were proposing. Thanks.
Posted on 7/20/24 at 12:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
Oh. That’s a different dumb idea than the dumb idea I thought you were proposing. Thanks.
Riveting response
Posted on 7/20/24 at 12:46 pm to TigerVespamon
quote:
TigerVespamon
Let’s all take a moment to laugh at this 1/2 blow job frick who came in hot supporting a conspiracy that he didn’t even learn the basic premise.
Now he is doubling down after being proven to be an imbecile.
Popular
Back to top


1










