- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/24/24 at 7:06 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It’s not that simple.
Sure it is. Your own graphs prove the statement I was referring to is false. Here is it again:
quote:
The share of women under 40 who have never given birth doubled from the early 1980s to the 2020s.
This post was edited on 9/24/24 at 7:07 am
Posted on 9/24/24 at 7:38 am to imjustafatkid
How does the graph prove that the percentage of women under 40 who had never given birth did not double?
Posted on 9/24/24 at 7:39 am to Wally Sparks
quote:
Interesting that the CDC doesn’t include California in their stats.
My assumption is the states collect data and provide it to the CDC. California likely have opted out.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 7:42 am to 4cubbies
Even liberals do not want to raise children around deranged homeless people and crime.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 9:15 am to 4cubbies
quote:
How does the graph prove that the percentage of women under 40 who had never given birth did not double?
Here's the original quote I responded to:
quote:
The share of women under 40 who have never given birth doubled from the early 1980s to the 2020s.
I said:
quote:
I doubt this is true once you add back the number of women who murdered their offspring in the womb.
Those women gave birth to their murdered child, they just pretend they did something else.
You then proceeded to show a graph that shows CDC-reported abortions at 1.25 million in the early 1980s, with abortions at about 622k in 2021 with California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey excluded from the totals. That very same graph shows that when states started being electing to be excluded from the data in 1997m the numbers dropped by about 300k. If we add 300k to the 622k the CDC could actually track in 2021, what do we get?
As I said:
quote:
Your own graphs prove the statement I was referring to is false.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 9:34 am to TDTOM
quote:
People with the means are leaving these shithole cities? Who would have guessed?
In some instances, they are relocating the others through aid.
Posted on 9/24/24 at 12:07 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You just don’t know anything about the greater New Orleans area.
I can definitely give you that one. Louisiana is a bit off my route or stomping grounds
Interesting system they have down there.
LINK
Odd. Take a look at Marion Edwards. If he had long crazy hair, would he pass for Einstein? Like, the father of relativity Einstein?
Posted on 9/24/24 at 2:06 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
Take a look at Marion Edwards. If he had long crazy hair, would he pass for Einstein? Like, the father of relativity Einstein?
I see Colonel Sanders.
This post was edited on 9/24/24 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 9/24/24 at 4:27 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I see Colonel Sanders.
We could always to get him to grow the goatee out.
Or maybe aix between the two.
Popular
Back to top

0






