- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The UN immigration pact makes it illegal to criticize immigration?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:17 pm
What in the fuq has happened to the normal sane people of the world?
Who will be responsible for enforcing this dumbass law?
Who will be responsible for enforcing this dumbass law?
7
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:20 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Who will be responsible for enforcing this dumbass law?
How dare you ask that question. 10 years in federal pound me in the arse prison for you.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:21 pm to Eli Goldfinger
what are you raving about
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:24 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Globalism bruh
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:25 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Who will be responsible for enforcing this dumbass law?
The mighty blue helmet fake army.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:29 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Let’s see how well they can handle someone other than underaged girls.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:34 pm to teke184
One Global mouthpiece was required because we need someone to communicate with the space aliens! The UN are our unelected Leader’s.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:37 pm to MrLSU
I thought they put Randy Marsh in charge.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:37 pm to Eli Goldfinger
so can we expect to see anything that gives any support or substance to the hysterical thread title?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:40 pm to 90proofprofessional
Probably objective 17 of the pact:
LINK
They didn't talk about that on NPR today buttercup?
My favorite part is they claim to desire to protect public discourse then immediately pivot to how they can silence dissent.
The part about training the media to properly report on the issue is scary as shite.
quote:
BJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration 33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration. To realize this commitment, we will draw from the following actions: a) Enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes targeting migrants, and train law enforcement and other public officials to identify, prevent and respond to such crimes and other acts of violence that target migrants, as well as to provide medical, legal and psychosocial assistance for victims b) Empower migrants and communities to denounce any acts of incitement to violence directed towards migrants by informing them of available mechanisms for redress, and ensure that those who actively participate in the commission of a hate crime targeting migrants are held accountable, in accordance with national legislation, while upholding international human rights law, in particular the right to freedom of expression c) Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet- based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media
LINK
They didn't talk about that on NPR today buttercup?
My favorite part is they claim to desire to protect public discourse then immediately pivot to how they can silence dissent.
The part about training the media to properly report on the issue is scary as shite.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:48 pm to Turbeauxdog
i saw hate crimes and incitement to violence in there as part of "objective 17", nothing making it a crime to criticize immigration though
baseless hysteria gobbled up by idiots yet again, confirmed
maybe next time buttercup!
baseless hysteria gobbled up by idiots yet again, confirmed
maybe next time buttercup!
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:51 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Who will be responsible for enforcing this dumbass law?
Have seen the U.K. lately in the news? I have little doubt the police there will soon be twittering about the new "laws".
Posted on 12/3/18 at 7:57 pm to 90proofprofessional
No, I'm correct this time sport. Op said illegal not criminal.
Tel me what this means for the BBC.
Hint: it means the U.K. will need to stop funding news that criticizes immigration.
Take your "L" and move on.
quote:
and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants
Tel me what this means for the BBC.
Hint: it means the U.K. will need to stop funding news that criticizes immigration.
Take your "L" and move on.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:00 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
stopping allocation of public funding or material support
lmao that makes something illegal now?
maybe next time!
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:07 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
lmao that makes something illegal now?
for the public news agencies, errrr, yeah?
And that's just one issue with it, but I don't have to go further for you to be typically wrong and myself to be correct. We don't have to go into hate crimes = hate speech = speech that rejects progressive immigration lunacy
So you're not very smart or honest are you?
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:10 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
for the public news agencies, errrr, yeah?
heh, what a fail of a reach. if you receive gubmint loot on some condition, and fail to meet that condition, it doesn't make it illegal to fail to meet the condition
quote:
And that's just one issue with it, but I don't have to go further for you to be typically wrong and myself to be correct
you have completely, utterly failed to support the op title as stated, but at least you gave it a shot and that's more than the rest
quote:
So you're not very smart or honest are you?
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:15 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
heh, what a fail of a reach. if you receive gubmint loot on some condition, and fail to meet that condition, it doesn't make it illegal to fail to meet the condition
So a situation where a person is punished for not following the law is not a situation where a person did something illegal.
You can't make this kind of stupidity up.
Or maybe it's the dishonesty instead.
Let me know which one. Or let me know what NPR tells you to think tomorrow. I have time.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:18 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So a situation where a person is punished for not following the law is not a situation where a person did something illegal.
when the punishment is the revocation of a conditional privilege, like free money, as opposed to an actual right or freedom? yep
and in this case, it wouldn't be the criticizer "not following the law". it would be the government supporting them with money while they systematically promote xenophobia, as the Objective states
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:19 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
when the punishment is the revocation of a conditional privilege, like free money, as opposed to an actual right or freedom? yep
So it's illegal. Thanks for confirming
Posted on 12/3/18 at 8:20 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So it's illegal. Thanks for confirming
nope, they're perfectly free to criticize, without any personal risk of legal sanction or imprisonment
just as they were before
your position necessarily assumes they have a right to unqualified government support
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 8:22 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News