- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Supreme Court Leak Only Accelerated the Inevitable
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:35 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:35 am
Maybe just something for folks to consider. This thing is headed to mass riots and military intervention if we have any hope of not losing this country. Sorry, it's just how it is. Thread after thread and comment after comment on this board confirm it. Nobody seems to believe there is a legal way to fix this country and most seem to think we have officially lost it already. And I would say that's probably true - unless - it's as some of us say and we are headed towards a period of military control.
What we are seeing here is an attempt to strong arm the supreme court with an angry mob. This is outrageous and unacceptable. It doesn't matter which side of the aisle it comes from, this behavior is antithetical to the American Ideal.
If you have already convinced yourself that the American Experiment has failed then you should welcome this sort of behavior from the left. Because eventually something will have to give. It has been foretold that the military will intervene. And we need them to do just that.
Hell, at this point I wish Biden would actually walk on stage and pledge his fealty to Hitler himself, alive and well all these years later down in Argentina.
Anyways, yeah, trying to publicly bully the Supreme Court on the heels of a stolen election is a super bold move. The good news here maybe is that this leak indicates that the overall timeline has accelerated and we are that much closer to the point where shite gets set straight.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
What we are seeing here is an attempt to strong arm the supreme court with an angry mob. This is outrageous and unacceptable. It doesn't matter which side of the aisle it comes from, this behavior is antithetical to the American Ideal.
If you have already convinced yourself that the American Experiment has failed then you should welcome this sort of behavior from the left. Because eventually something will have to give. It has been foretold that the military will intervene. And we need them to do just that.
Hell, at this point I wish Biden would actually walk on stage and pledge his fealty to Hitler himself, alive and well all these years later down in Argentina.
Anyways, yeah, trying to publicly bully the Supreme Court on the heels of a stolen election is a super bold move. The good news here maybe is that this leak indicates that the overall timeline has accelerated and we are that much closer to the point where shite gets set straight.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:40 am to BoarEd
quote:
Because eventually something will have to give. It has been foretold that the military will intervene. And we need them to do just that.
If the military intervenes its will be against the “far right white supremacist nazis.”
The left controls the military
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:42 am to Cosmo
quote:
If the military intervenes its will be against the “far right white supremacist nazis.”
The left controls the military
I disagree.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:44 am to BoarEd
They may be angry and loud and crude and ugly, but...
they are exercising their constitutional right to free assembly and peaceful protest.
Nothing wrong with that.Now, when the decision comes down, if RvW is thrown out, and if they attack the courts, and state assemblies, then we have a different situation.
As it is now, they are within their rights.
they are exercising their constitutional right to free assembly and peaceful protest.
Nothing wrong with that.Now, when the decision comes down, if RvW is thrown out, and if they attack the courts, and state assemblies, then we have a different situation.
As it is now, they are within their rights.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:46 am to BoarEd
The leak is a form of transparency for the public.
But, we all know who is going to to do civil unrest and riots and it isn't the good guys.
If SCOTUS placates the ones raising hell, this draft opinion won't hold.
But, we all know who is going to to do civil unrest and riots and it isn't the good guys.
If SCOTUS placates the ones raising hell, this draft opinion won't hold.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:47 am to BoarEd
Can we use the Capitol Hill Police rules of engagement where you can shoot unarmed protestors when you feel threatened by them approaching your position?
Love the new precedent that has given LEO to deal with rioters and protestors!!!
Love the new precedent that has given LEO to deal with rioters and protestors!!!
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:49 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
As it is now, they are within their rights.
I agree. I'm just speculating as to what will happen down the road. The court can't back out now lest they basically tell everyone outright that they're more concerned with how liberals will react than they are with their duty to uphold the law.
They're gonna throw it out. And all hell will break loose. We all know it. We all watched half this country burn just a short while ago because the Man of Orange is Not Good.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:49 am to BoarEd
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:59 am to TrueTiger
quote:
If SCOTUS placates the ones raising hell, this draft opinion won't hold.
I believe the leaked draft was a 5-4 decision, correct? If Roberts was with the majority, does ANYONE believe he would stand firm, or fold like a cheap suit? He'll placate the mob in the blink of an eye, given his past decisions.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 8:59 am to YankeeBama
Yes. Wow! Upvotes and commented.
for that, man.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:02 am to TD422
quote:How could it be when there are currently only 8 sitting justices that heard arguments?
I believe the leaked draft was a 5-4 decision
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:03 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:09 am to HubbaBubba
Perhaps it’s one of two drafts, and the decision has not yet been arrived at. I’m sure there is process by which the clerks go ahead and draft multiple versions, of course one for each/either of the main outcomes. The clerks don’t just begin drafting the written opinions only after the final decision has been arrived at. I’d guess that it’s likely normal procedure for them to have baseline drafts so they not horrendously under the gun only after final decision is made. And of course it’s only the more inflammatory draft version that was leaked, as opposed to both, which would make it rather obvious what the actual situation was.
To which essentially all this furor is prefaced upon “OMG, they could possibly overturn RvW!!” Well no f*ckin duh. Yeah, that’s one of the potential outcomes, in which case this is how a written opinion may look.
IMO this is the situation.
To which essentially all this furor is prefaced upon “OMG, they could possibly overturn RvW!!” Well no f*ckin duh. Yeah, that’s one of the potential outcomes, in which case this is how a written opinion may look.
IMO this is the situation.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:21 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:11 am to Cosmo
quote:
If the military intervenes its will be against the “far right white supremacist nazis.”
The left controls the military
Maybe, maybe not. It’s true that the brass are all liberals. Hell, a general is pretty much a politician. But, from the top of the enlisted, Sergeant Major I believe, on down are the bulk of the forces, and they will still uphold the Constitution. The left hasn’t purged them all yet.
I side with BoarEd on this one. I think that conservatives would have the majority of the armed forces on their side.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:12 am to BoarEd
Haven't we been saying this for the past decade? They will keep kicking the hornet's nest so they have an excuse to enact more control, e.g. Martial Law.
It's all by design.
China is the blueprint.
It's all by design.
China is the blueprint.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:14 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
How could it be
Well, I did ask a question...and didn't make a definitive statement. You could have corrected me without the snark, bruh. So it's 5-3 with Roberts on deck.
From Politico:
A person familiar with the court’s deliberations said that four of the other Republican-appointed justices — Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — had voted with Alito in the conference held among the justices after hearing oral arguments in December, and that line-up remains unchanged as of this week.
The three Democratic-appointed justices — Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — are working on one or more dissents, according to the person. How Chief Justice John Roberts will ultimately vote, and whether he will join an already written opinion or draft his own, is unclear.
My point still stands...Roberts will stick his finger in the air and check which way the wind is blowing. Not exactly a quality anyone should want in a CJ.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:19 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:25 am to Placekicker
quote:
But, from the top of the enlisted, Sergeant Major I believe, on down are the bulk of the forces, and they will still uphold the Constitution. The left hasn’t purged them all yet.
My son has been at a few rather big bases. We’ve got to know people at all of them. They’re all great people, but you might not want to bet your life on that statement. Most of them will follow orders.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:26 am to BoarEd
The leak was of a draft that still has to have four other justices willing to agree to it, and even with the conservative bent of the court now, I have little confidence that would have happened even without a leak.
Alito and and Thomas are the only two I am certain of.
Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Sotamayor are absolutely against if I had to predict.
Are we that certain that Gorusch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett all are going to side with the conservatives? I'm not. Before or after a leak.
Alito and and Thomas are the only two I am certain of.
Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Sotamayor are absolutely against if I had to predict.
Are we that certain that Gorusch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett all are going to side with the conservatives? I'm not. Before or after a leak.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 9:27 am
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:32 am to Bham Bammer
The leak won’t have any bearing on how the Justices vote, IMO. I mean, if it were to have a bearing inasmuch as the hullabaloo has spooked one or some of them, well then that’s the process from here on out. Every single decision will be formed around the same situation each and every time they have any sort of controversial/polarizing case before them. I think they go well out of their way here to avoid that literal SC killing precedent.
Posted on 5/5/22 at 9:53 am to davyjones
I mean, how would we know? I am saying I am not at all confident the decision would have been toward the conservative side anyway. Your suggestion is that the vote could in fact be a factor, but the opposite way?
Posted on 5/6/22 at 10:38 am to BoarEd
quote:
It has been foretold that the military will intervene. And we need them to do just that.
We see the Left thumbing their noses at the constitution, the border has been abandoned, elections stolen, and now they are depending on the mob to influence the Supreme Court.
the military- who is also is sworn the uphold the constitution- does nothing.
So when is something going to happen?
Popular
Back to top

9







