Started By
Message

re: The service industries are decimated

Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by RobertFootball
SC
Member since Mar 2021
1337 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:00 pm to
Which is why they aren’t worth $15 an hour like we’ve been telling you.
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

The only way things stay cheap is if you have a huge underclass working for very little, which is not a desirable state
How many adults are earning minimum wage in the US? I bet it's not "huge" by any means.

Those earning bottom wages are earning them for two reasons:

1. they've made the choice to be there, either through sloth or poor decisions that got them in a bad position with the law
2. they're incapable of earning more, either through mental or physical limitations

I don't see what is to be gained by giving them more money. It's the same thing that the anti-1%ers get wrong. There will always be a top 1%, a top half, a bottom half, a bottom 1%, etc.

Maybe that's where you and I don't align. Can you explain to me why an adult making minimum wage should be paid more - not as a function of them improving their position but simply because they're poor?
Posted by CedarChest
South of Mejico
Member since Jun 2020
2782 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:07 pm to
It's the goobermint setting up a false pretext to flood the country with illegal aliens, and I ain't jokin'.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:12 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:48 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111519 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

The economic benefits outweigh the economic costs of doing so.


At what point, in dollars/hour, does that shift? Or does it never shift?

In other words, why not raise the minimum wage to $1,000/hr?
Posted by CedarChest
South of Mejico
Member since Jun 2020
2782 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

hat's every Chik-Fil-A and Canes around most the country.
It won't be long now for the full ill effects of the commie Cathy son taking over Chik-Fil-A to kick in. The entire CFA brand is going to slide into mediocrity and then bankruptcy. Just you watch and see.
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

I think it's just plain pragmatic. The economic benefits outweigh the economic costs of doing so. It's nothing to do with how much money certain people "deserve." A lot of people are overpaid and a lot of people are underpaid. The US economy has functioned extremely well with much higher minimum wages (and many states already have them) so I don't buy into the doom and gloom. I pay attention to the empirical results.
Since you didn't answer - fewer than 2% of Americans make minimum wage.

Wouldn't it be better to address the "why" before placing that burden on employers?

Why are able bodied Americans making $7.25 an hour? Why are they not taking control of their own situations? Lastly, why should I, as an employer, pay someone more money for no increase in productivity or ability?
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:36 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:49 pm
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:48 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21755 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

In other words, why not raise the minimum wage to $1,000/hr?


Bueller?
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Right but how many currently earn less than $15/hour? An increase doesn't just hit the current min wage earners. It affects everyone up to $15 or whatever the number is.

Why should the burden be on the employers?

Let's say I have X employees at $7.50/hr. At midnight, all of their wages get doubled. My payroll has doubled.

If the employees are not twice as efficient, twice as smart, twice as good looking, twice as friendly, twice as good at their job, how would you suggest that I, the employer, offset this artificially inflated cost I'm now responsible for?
Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:51 pm to
Won’t be long til you see videos set to music of Obama and Biden and Harris and AOC inside of government owned Taco Bell’s. And the menu will have three choices. And no free refills bitch!
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:51 pm to

This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I don't really view it this way. All employers will have to pay more so it's not really a burden if it's implemented cleverly. There is a potential for stuff like regulatory capture but you can easily guard against that with other policies like tax cuts for small businesses. Hell, we gave them money during the pandemic to keep people on the payroll so can't we do the same with a tax cut?

It's really a burden on consumers but like I said, I think the trade off is worth it
I understand you don't view it this way. I would say you're likely not a business owner or in some form of upper management. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

You're example is shot through with more bureaucracy and legislation as if that solves any problems at all.

Since when does throwing good money after bad ever fix anything? Why is it more attractive to you to operate under more laws, more regulation? The answer is, I think, in my second sentence of this post.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21755 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

I think it's very possible to believe that a few dollar increase can be absorbed quite well and a big dollar increase will cause chaos. I don't see how it's an all or nothing proposition.


“Absorbed” just means the impact is smaller and, I suspect, a nice way of saying that a different group is going to eat this increase. In reality the exact same thing happens in both cases and with every increment in between. The only question is how much chaos.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111519 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

An increase doesn't just hit the current min wage earners. It affects everyone up to $15 or whatever the number is.


Tell me you’re retarded without telling me you’re retarded.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 4:05 pm to


This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:49 pm
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 4:06 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 4:50 pm
Posted by Abraham H Parnassis
Member since Jul 2020
2552 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

I think the cost of goods would rise somewhat in a business like fast food or certain retail. Probably a dollar or two for a combo at McDonald's for instance (plenty of research on this). Low wage labor is about 20-30% of revenue in these industries.

And if the market can't bear a raise in price commensurate with my new burden of payroll?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111519 posts
Posted on 4/23/21 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Are you retarded? DO you think only current minimum wage earners will get a pay bump?


No. And I definitely think that people making $15.01/hr before the increase will definitely not be asking for an increase.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram