Started By
Message

re: The Red Hen has not reopened since refusing to serve Sarah Huckabee Sanders last week

Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:41 am to
Posted by TexasTiger80
Texas
Member since Apr 2018
2396 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:41 am to
Keep melting baw...and we will keep winning
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141701 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:43 am to
quote:

you may will be marching with them.


What's your evidence to support this salacious claim?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141701 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:44 am to
I can't think of a more appropriate name for him. He did it to himself though by claiming to be some sort of board savior. Like that loony UG fan and DraconianBS.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37969 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:46 am to
quote:

AggieHank86



Biggest cuck on the board
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73656 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:48 am to
He's sort of entertaining though.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:50 am to
quote:

you may well be marching with them.

What's your evidence to support this salacious claim?
Big word for you. Not used properly, but still a big word.

I did not claim that he IS marching, I said that he "may well" be marching.

I would surmise that English is not your first language, but you candidly do not seem to have the intelligence to learn more than one language. As such, I make the (rebuttable) presumption that your understanding of your only language is simply ... limited.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 11:54 am
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:51 am to
What a fruit.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141701 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:52 am to
Are you saying your claim wasn't salacious? You are an Aggie after all.

That was too easy.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49051 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:53 am to
quote:

And I see you as one of those lawyers who gets an idea in his head early in a case and then refuses to let it go, no matter how much contrary evidence is developed in the following months.


What contrary evidence to Huckabee's statements has developed?

Classic liberal projection.

quote:

Simply due to political bias


Classic liberal projection.

You are a caricature of the typical liberal with an overinflated sense of their own intelligence and education. Do you just have the one law degree? No LL.M? No other degrees? No master degree(s) in business? Hmmm....undereducated. Perhaps I should be lecturing you....


But that's not how I roll.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 11:59 am to
quote:

What contrary evidence to Huckabee's statements has developed?
Affirmatively evidence? Statements from employees at several nearby businesses that they observed no "sidewalk protest" on the night in question.

Reasonable inference? The fact that dozens of people have been interviewed and that none of them support Mike Huckabee's account. Not one person who saw Wilkinson at the Southern Inn. Not one person who saw a confrontation later in the evening. Not one person who saw "screaming." Not one person who saw a single picket. Need I go on?

quote:

Do you just have the one law degree? No LL.M? No other degrees? No master degree(s) in business? Hmmm....undereducated. Perhaps I should be lecturing you..
Just a double-degree in undergrad and the one law degree. Didn't see a need for anything more.
quote:

But that's not how I roll.
Sure it's not.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 12:12 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75199 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

can't think of a more appropriate name for him. He did it to himself though by claiming to be some sort of board savior. Like that loony UG fan and DraconianBS.



It is perfect. B Want was hilarious but this is the best one i have heard. Olddawgshite is a loon for sure
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49051 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Affirmatively evidence? Statements from employees at several nearby businesses that they observed no "sidewalk protest" on the night in question. Reasonable inference? The fact that dozens of people have been interviewed and that none of them support Mike Huckabee's account. quote: Do you just have the one law degree? No LL.M? No other degrees? No master degree(s) in business? Hmmm....undereducated. Perhaps I should be lecturing you.. Just a double-degree in undergrad and the one law degree. Didn't see a need for anything more. quote: But that's not how I roll. Sure it's not.



Hmmm....so nobody is contesting the fact sanders' family was followed by the restaraunt owner. Perfect. I'll stipulate there was no sidewalk protest if you stipulate the owner followed the family tonthe second restaurant. Deal?

Too bad you stopped your education so short. Someone that likes to lecture as much as you do really should have more education. You don't even have enough graduate credits to be a college professor in most states. How sad.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 12:03 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

so nobody is contesting the fact sanders' family was followed by the restaraunt owner. Perfect. I'll stipulate there was no sidewalk protest if you stipulate the owner followed the family tonthe second restaurant. Deal?
Of course not, because I did not say that.

How about we stipulate to the following:

1. Wilkinson asked SHS to leave Red Hen.

2. Point 1 was rude as Hell, but legal under both Virginia and federal law.

3. SHS went to Good Place Farms B&B upon leaving Red Hen.

4. SHS has no personal knowledge of events after she left Red Hen.

5. Sanders family went to Southern Inn upon leaving Red Hen.

6. To date, no person with personal knowledge has provided a statement that Wilkinson followed the Sanders family down the street to Southern Inn.

7. To date, no person with personal knowledge has provided a statement that Wilkinson entered the Southern Inn or confronted the Sanders family there.

8. One person held upon one sign at Country Inn.

9. To date, no person with personal knowledge has said that he observed a sidewalk protest outside Southern Inn.

10. Wilkinson and the Sanders family had a brief, encounter on the street later in the evening. Details of that encounter are unknown at this time.

11. Owner of Good Place Farms was 13 miles away and has no personal knowledge of these events.

12. Mike Huckabee was hundreds of miles away and has no personal knowledge of these events.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

AggieHank86


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49051 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:32 pm to
Points 8 and 9 contradict eachother. Point 8 also contradicts your assertion that any weight should be given to the "dozens" of employees that said there was no sidewalk protest. You have stipulated to the contrary. Additionally, there has been zero rebuttal to the widespread claim that the owner followed the family to the second restaraunt.

Your need to feel important has caused you to abandon common sense. Taking your position despite developing evidence to the contrary. Like I said, classic liberal projection. Don't feel bad. Someone of your insufficient education shouldn't be held to a very high standard.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

From an ideological perspective, it isn't.

I have said REPEATEDLY that I disfavor public accommodation laws, would repeal them all and that any business owner should be able to choose who he will (or will not) do business with.

The only caveat on my position is that the business owner must post/publish this fact prior to denying service, because no one should be allowed to be seated for dinner (or whatever service) and then suffer the indignity of being escorted from the premises without prior warning.

Of course, we do not live in that world. In the real world, we DO have public accommodation laws, and those laws (in most jurisdictions) DO prohibit racial discrimination and DO NOT prohibit political discrimination.

quote:
I KNOW you wouldn't support a white person if they asked Maxine Waters, or any other black person, to leave their business though.

So, you would be wrong, in a world without public accommodation laws ... provided only that the business posted a "no service" warning and did not first allow her to be seated.

In the world in which we actually live, that business owner would be breaking the law and should suffer the consequences.


So , you're argument boils down to

"Gosh darnit , if it just wasn't illegal to discriminate against negroes, like it is not illegal to discriminate against people who you disagree with politically I'd defend the right to discriminate against both?"

Pathetic.

We're not talking about legality here, we're talking about morality. Of course being a liberal, you have no principles or morals. So there is that.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Points 8 and 9 contradict eachother.
I do not see one sign in a window as being remotely the same as a sidewalk protest, but we can certainly re-phrase 9:

9. To date, no person with personal knowledge has said that he observed a multiple persons protesting on the sidewalk outside Southern Inn.
quote:

Point 8 also contradicts your assertion that any weight should be given to the "dozens" of employees that said there was no sidewalk protest. You have stipulated to the contrary
Are you serious? One point says that people looked out the window and DID NOT see a protest. The other says "we have found no one who claims he DID see a protest." They are not remotely inconsistent. To the contrary, they corroborate one another.

You have a big cheering section of biased ideologues. Congratulations for that, I suppose. If you actually practice law, however, you MUST know that you have not remotely proven the veracity of Huckabee's inadmissible, third- and fourth-hand account.

With the change to "9," do we have a useful Statement of Agreed Facts?
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 12:57 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

We're not talking about legality here, we're talking about morality. Of course being a liberal, you have no principles or morals. So there is that.

I oppose public accommodation laws, and from that you contend that I am a liberal.

Who ties your shoes for you in the morning?

This is one of the points on which we libertarians and "conservatives" are in full Constitutional agreement.
This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 12:49 pm
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

oppose public accommodation laws, and from that you contend that I am a liberal.

Who ties your shoes for you in the morning?


I am retired and thus rarely know where my shoes with laces are any more.

This post was edited on 7/6/18 at 12:53 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75199 posts
Posted on 7/6/18 at 12:47 pm to
Hero Hank still making a fool of himself trying to pretend to be lawyer
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram