Started By
Message

re: The poorest people in this country have 4k tvs and 1000 dollar cell phones.

Posted on 10/31/25 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73335 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 12:17 pm to
crickets from PowerBottom
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135739 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

By definition not a high end luxury item...
No.
By definition, the target has moved.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170773 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 12:51 pm to
What has moved is a 4K TV is no longer considered a high end luxury item

I don't know why you're willing to die on that hill that it is because it clearly isn't
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46246 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 1:32 pm to
High end merchandise is a relative scale, isnt it?

A 4K large screen TV, adorning every trailer and section 8 apartment in this country is at the high-end of the scale of available TV's. I could argue, that if you can't even feed yourself, you should probably skip the TV (and the internet streaming and/or cable charges that come with it) and feed your family first.... but that can't be it because they are all fat.

Similarly, an apple or andriod smart phone, especially government issued, is a revolting example of waste. It too comes with monthly charges that these "starving poor people" always seem to find a way to pay, even though I've been told that they cant afford a $30 state ID card.

They also always seem to have expensive shoes and clothes on too. I guess a $150 pair of basketball shoes ins't "high-end" to you either.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135739 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

What has moved is a 4K TV is no longer considered a high end luxury item
Powerman, you are addressing price.
I am addressing luxury.

The TVs you're talking about were both high end, and luxury products, 20yrs ago. They are far nicer now than they were then. Their affordability does not change the fact.

The problem with our communication here arises from the societal relativity of poverty. In the comparison of Powerman's possessions vs those of an "impoverished" person, the impoverished person lags and wishes he was Powerman, even if the he himself enjoys a much better lifestyle than his predecessors.

Poverty floats with median income. When median income in the US eventually hits $100K/HH, threshold poverty in the US will be $60K! Because "poverty" always elicits empathy, folks will be empathetic regardless of lifestyle that $60K allows at that juncture.

What could folks making $60K/yr afford in that scenario?
It does not matter, because the calculus is simply formulaic based on median income.

So we have an economic class of 36M or so, which we in the US refer to as impoverished, but which bears no semblance to internationally impoverished peoples. Further we offer SNAP to families up to 30% above the poverty line.
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 1:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram