The Overblown Oath Keepers Indictment

From a retired Department of Defense Senior Analyst:
The recently released Federal grand jury indictment of the Oathkeepers was almost certainly unsealed so it could be used as a divert the public's attention away from the unfolding email scandal of Dr. Anthony Fauci.

It is likely that hundreds of thousands of Americans perished unnecessarily as a result of Dr. Fauci's dubious medical advice on lock downs and the use prophylactic drugs. Additionally, various emails show Fauci's claims about the origins of the virus were pre-mature and may have been a CYA move over the NIH's (indirect) funding of the Wuhan lab's gain of function virus research.

What better way to divert attention away than to put out an overblown prosecutorial document that fans the flames of the false narrative that Trump supporters are domestic extremists.

As is the case with many indictments, the prosecutors wove pieces of irrelevant information together and used innuendo to create a conspiracy theory alleging the Oathkeepers began planning to disrupt the electoral college vote in November and all of their actions in the lead up to January 6th were part of a coordinated effort.

The Justice Department knows its case is weak. Consider this statement from prosecutor Kathryn Rakoczy:

"We do not have, at this point, someone explicitly saying, 'Our plan is to storm the Capitol to stop certification'"

The prosecution's conspiracy theory that the Oathkeepers intended to attack the Capitol is severely compromised by the evidence presented in the indictment. The case gets completely obliterated when exculpatory evidence (not in the indictment) is presented.

What really happened?

The evidence in the indictment supports that the Oathkeepers came to Washington DC to attend the Stop The Steal rally and were making preparations in defense of anticipated attacks by Antifa counter-protestors.


From revealthestealblogspot.com
LINK