- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The only way to save our country
Posted on 8/17/20 at 10:57 am
Posted on 8/17/20 at 10:57 am
Is authored by Ted Cruz. Does this stand a chance?
Regarding Term Limits/lobbying restrictions for Congress
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 3, 2019
Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Lee) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.
That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:
?—
1.No person who has served 3 terms as a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
2.No person who has served 2 terms as a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years.
3.No term beginning before the date of the ratification of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility for election or appointment under this article.
.
LINK
Regarding Term Limits/lobbying restrictions for Congress
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 3, 2019
Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Lee) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to limiting the number of terms that a Member of Congress may serve.
That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:
?—
1.No person who has served 3 terms as a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than 1 year.
2.No person who has served 2 terms as a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate shall be included as 1 term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the vacancy for more than 3 years.
3.No term beginning before the date of the ratification of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility for election or appointment under this article.
.
LINK
This post was edited on 8/17/20 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 8/17/20 at 11:19 am to The Levee
step one would be hanging george soros by the neck high for everyone to see
Posted on 8/17/20 at 11:20 am to arcalades
Hang the bastard
Hang him high
Raise his body
To the sky
And when his legs
Quit twitching
We’ll know
It’s the end of him
And we all can go home
Hang him high
Raise his body
To the sky
And when his legs
Quit twitching
We’ll know
It’s the end of him
And we all can go home
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:15 pm to The Levee
It’s a shame this Bill doesn’t get the attention it needs.
This would solve 95% of our problems
This would solve 95% of our problems
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:15 pm to teke184
Start shooting the MFing communists attacking citizens.
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:31 pm to The Levee
How is that going to change the fundamental problem of having a retarded electorate?
What we really need are poll tests.
What we really need are poll tests.
This post was edited on 8/17/20 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:42 pm to stuntman
Because it Makes a dumb decision not as permanent
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:47 pm to stuntman
quote:
What we really need are poll tests
First off, if you didn't graduate high school, automatic no vote (wasted huge taxpayer investment).
Second, if you have no earned income, no vote. (exception: social security income counts as earned)
Problems solved.
This post was edited on 8/17/20 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:50 pm to Dawgwithnoname
Nah I don’t think education level separates us as citizens. Paying taxes might.
It keeps corruption at bay
It keeps corruption at bay
Posted on 8/17/20 at 12:50 pm to stuntman
quote:
How is that going to change the fundamental problem of having a retarded electorate?
It forces the 2 major parties to divide their resources across far more battle grounds. This could in turn give rise to a legit 3rd party. Which would then change our current news cycle as well as there would be more than 2 sides to make out as heroes and villains.
Posted on 8/17/20 at 1:02 pm to Sailin Tiger
quote:
It forces the 2 major parties to divide their resources across far more battle grounds. This could in turn give rise to a legit 3rd party. Which would then change our current news cycle as well as there would be more than 2 sides to make out as heroes and villains.
This is an interesting discussion and I’ve said for years that I want a third party because it’s just ridiculous how we put everything into those two sets of checklists. That said, what do you say to the very legitimate argument that the above changes would usher in more extremism?
Posted on 8/17/20 at 1:05 pm to thatthang
This bill should be demanded
Posted on 8/17/20 at 1:08 pm to The Levee
Cut off all food supplies to the cities. When the libs come out to steal our stuff, shoot them.
Popular
Back to top
4







