- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The line item veto...its time for a fresh look
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:01 pm
Thinking about this in light of the bullshite omnibus.
I know that in Clinton v. N.Y. the Supemes declared it unconstitutional; however, I think the argument can be made that the passage of such omnibus bills thwarts the veto power and that because appropriations are supposed to be presented in separate bills (one for each department), the President retains the authority to veto departmental appropriations within such omnibus legislation.
I know that in Clinton v. N.Y. the Supemes declared it unconstitutional; however, I think the argument can be made that the passage of such omnibus bills thwarts the veto power and that because appropriations are supposed to be presented in separate bills (one for each department), the President retains the authority to veto departmental appropriations within such omnibus legislation.
This post was edited on 3/23/18 at 5:08 pm
7
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:07 pm to udtiger
Sounds great in theory but you really don't want it in practice.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:07 pm to udtiger
Jug Ears had a pen and a phone ...
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:16 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:
Sounds great in theory but you really don't want it in practice.
Yes - yes I do.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 5:18 pm to ChineseBandit58
F it. Bring on the monarchy.
King TRUMP.
King TRUMP.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 6:05 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Jug Ears had a pen and a phone ...
Thank goodness he did NOT have use of:
Posted on 3/23/18 at 6:49 pm to udtiger
No, because there will be another Obama or FDR at some point.
Posted on 3/23/18 at 6:55 pm to dpd901
if Trump wants his wall, take 25 Billion out of the Defense appropriation, declaring it a national defense emergency
problem solved
problem solved
Posted on 3/23/18 at 10:11 pm to udtiger
Bump
Posted on 3/23/18 at 10:13 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
declaring it a national defense emergency
I believe all he has to do, is declare it a national security issue...
Posted on 3/23/18 at 10:26 pm to udtiger
quote:It thwarts the veto power less than it does the voting power of those in congress, both the practical power and political power.
made that the passage of such omnibus bills thwarts the veto power
The veto may be a bigger political risk but nothing about the veto itself changes. And he can still specify why he vetoed it. A member of congress could do the same with his/her no vote, but it's harder to garner support when those who would normally do the same, may feel that the overall bill is more important or some other part of it altogether.
One person had the most power to stop it or anything in it. He chose not to use it, and the lack of specificity of the power doesn't excuse it.
Posted on 3/24/18 at 1:38 am to udtiger
quote:No. It's fricking not.
The line item veto...its time for a fresh look
Posted on 3/24/18 at 1:40 am to udtiger
quote:
The line item veto...its time for a fresh look
No....it's time to do budget the proper way, that's all.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News