Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The Hill: Supreme Court declines to take up 2020 case against Dominion

Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:35 pm
Posted by thejuiceisloose
UNO Fan
Member since Nov 2018
4167 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:35 pm
quote:

The Supreme Court on Monday chose not to take a case brought against Dominion Voting Systems and Facebook by voters who claimed that the two companies illegally influenced the 2020 election. Kevin O’Rourke, et al. filed a petition in September for a writ of certiorari, or review of the case by the Supreme Court, which has now been denied, effectively dismissing the case.


quote:

The group alleges that Dominion’s election technology, often criticized by allies of former President Trump, is crafted to influence results, arguing that the voting resources possess “systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities.” Dominion, Facebook and others “engaged in concerted action to interfere with the 2020 presidential election through a coordinated effort to, among other things, change voting laws without legislative approval, use unreliable voting machines, alter votes through an illegitimate adjudication process,” according to the lawsuit.

The case against Dominion was previously dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, among other lower courts, and was denied rehearing by the court in June before petitioning the nation’s highest court.


quote:

The Supreme Court did not provide reasoning or dissent behind its choice not to review the case.


LINK
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:36 pm to
Ole Clarence sleeping on the couch tonight!
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62413 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:37 pm to
Everyone want to bury the 2020 election results, and the big cheat…. They setting up a repeat in 2024
Posted by ezride25
Constitutional Republic
Member since Nov 2008
24278 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:40 pm to
Dominion only influences election results in other countries. Not this one, no.

Unprecedented cure.
Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

The Supreme Court did not provide reasoning or dissent behind its choice not to review the case.



Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8260 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

The Supreme Court did not provide reasoning or dissent behind its choice not to review the case.

The lack of explanation or dissent speaks quite loudly.

Posted by TOPAL
Member since Mar 2010
4523 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:46 pm to
This country is fricked, it will not end well when patriots have enough.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422404 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

The lack of explanation or dissent speaks quite loudly

Not for a simple denial of certain
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
8260 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

simple denial of certain


A what?

Considering the magnitude of the allegations, the implications it has on our country, and the complete distrust in Dominion by the public after what's been revealed over the past two years, you would think the LEAST the Supreme Court of the land could do is issue a half-assed dissent.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68583 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 10:01 pm to
See no mention of democrats saying dominion was bunk in their races even though they claimed it.

Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68583 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Not for a simple denial of certain


Y’all’s favorite lawyer got sentenced to 14 years in prison today.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 10:10 pm to
And Louisiana still uses Dominion.
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 10:10 pm to
Who?
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
17886 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

The Supreme Court did not provide reasoning or dissent behind its choice not to review the case.


Ah, the ole “I won’t even dignify that with a response.” I use this one on my wife a lot when she tries to fight about nothing.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
4082 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 11:04 pm to
If.

I'm having my doubts.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14173 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Considering the magnitude of the allegations, the implications it has on our country, and the complete distrust in Dominion by the public after what's been revealed over the past two years, you would think the LEAST the Supreme Court of the land could do is issue a half-assed dissent.

This was a simple up-or-down vote as to whether the Supreme Court was going to grant certiorari (a review) of the 10th Circuits’ affirmation of the District Courts dismissal based on the Plaintiffs’ failure to establish Federal jurisdiction as per Article III relating to standing.

quote:

the complete distrust in Dominion by the public after what's been revealed over the past two years,

What specifically has been revealed concerning Dominion that would be the basis for the public to distrust Dominion?
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18292 posts
Posted on 12/5/22 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

The Hill: Supreme Court declines to take up 2020 case against Dominion


Turtle and the Federalist Society played Trump like a fiddle and no longer need him
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
18194 posts
Posted on 12/6/22 at 12:12 am to
What Patriots?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram