- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The 'Great Reset' is about to become the law in Europe - US not far behind?
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:55 pm
LINK
Citing concerns over climate change and the "golden opportunity" for societal change created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Economic Forum launched in June 2020 a radical "Great Reset" initiative, in partnership with various leaders from the public and private sectors.
CEOs of major corporations, as well as banks, central banks, financial institutions, labor unions, international organizations, and government leaders — including John Kerry, the Biden administration's "climate czar" — quickly signed on to the plan, which pledges to push the "reset" button on the global economy.
As World Economic Forum head Klaus Schwab wrote in an op-ed about the Great Reset published in June, "The world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a 'Great Reset' of capitalism."
Supporters of the Great Reset aim to alter the global economy through two different reform strategies. The first is to create a variety of new government programs, including policies similar to the far-left Green New Deal resolution proposed in 2019 by New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The second, even more far-reaching part of the Great Reset is the widespread adoption of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards, which change the way businesses are evaluated.
Under an ESG model, companies are not only rated using traditional metrics, such as revenues and the quality of goods and services offered, but also on a variety of social justice metrics, such as their carbon footprint, air quality of a business' supply chain, and having the "right" ratio of Asians to Hispanics working in the company, among many other factors.
Thousands of companies have already adopted ESG standards around the world, including an estimated 82% of large companies in the United States, and to this point, they have done so voluntarily.
It appears that those warnings could soon become a reality in Europe. On March 10, the European Parliament voted in favor of a resolution that demands all large companies in the European Union, as well as some smaller businesses, put ESG standards in place, or else face harsh penalties from their respective national governments.
Although the resolution passed by the European Parliament is not yet binding on EU member states, it is strong sign that it is likely to occur. In order for the resolution to become binding, the European Commission must first formally propose the resolution as legislation, and then the Parliament and member states must vote in favor of the legislation. This is a move that seems highly likely to occur, due to the overwhelming support for the resolution in the EU Parliament. The commission is expected to provide official legislation as early as June 2021.
According to international law firm Shearman and Sterling, the "proposed due diligence framework targets three categories of 'potential and/or actual adverse impacts,'" including "human rights," the environment, and "good governance."
These categories are deliberately broad and would in many cases require businesses to make sweeping reforms to align with left-wing goals, imposing them on the societies in which they operate. For example, the "human rights" category "means any potential or actual adverse impact that may impair the full enjoyment of human rights by individuals or groups of individuals in relation to human rights, including social, worker and trade union rights."
Protecting the environment would involve, according to Shearman and Sterling, "the right to a safe, clean, healthy, sustainable and biodiverse environment" as defined by "internationally recognized and EU environmental standards."
Further, the resolution demands that business "strategies should be aligned with ... the European Green Deal, and the commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, and Union international policy, especially the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Paris Agreement," among other standards.
Perhaps most importantly for Americans and U.S. businesses, the Parliament's resolution calls for these ESG requirements to cover all of a business' activities, including its "value chain."
The "value chain" is defined in the resolution as "all activities, operations, business relationships and investment chains of an undertaking and includes entities with which the undertaking has a direct or indirect business relationship, upstream and downstream, and which either: (a) supply products, parts of products or services that contribute to the undertaking's own products or services, or (b) receive products or services from the undertaking."
...
Citing concerns over climate change and the "golden opportunity" for societal change created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Economic Forum launched in June 2020 a radical "Great Reset" initiative, in partnership with various leaders from the public and private sectors.
CEOs of major corporations, as well as banks, central banks, financial institutions, labor unions, international organizations, and government leaders — including John Kerry, the Biden administration's "climate czar" — quickly signed on to the plan, which pledges to push the "reset" button on the global economy.
As World Economic Forum head Klaus Schwab wrote in an op-ed about the Great Reset published in June, "The world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a 'Great Reset' of capitalism."
Supporters of the Great Reset aim to alter the global economy through two different reform strategies. The first is to create a variety of new government programs, including policies similar to the far-left Green New Deal resolution proposed in 2019 by New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The second, even more far-reaching part of the Great Reset is the widespread adoption of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards, which change the way businesses are evaluated.
Under an ESG model, companies are not only rated using traditional metrics, such as revenues and the quality of goods and services offered, but also on a variety of social justice metrics, such as their carbon footprint, air quality of a business' supply chain, and having the "right" ratio of Asians to Hispanics working in the company, among many other factors.
Thousands of companies have already adopted ESG standards around the world, including an estimated 82% of large companies in the United States, and to this point, they have done so voluntarily.
It appears that those warnings could soon become a reality in Europe. On March 10, the European Parliament voted in favor of a resolution that demands all large companies in the European Union, as well as some smaller businesses, put ESG standards in place, or else face harsh penalties from their respective national governments.
Although the resolution passed by the European Parliament is not yet binding on EU member states, it is strong sign that it is likely to occur. In order for the resolution to become binding, the European Commission must first formally propose the resolution as legislation, and then the Parliament and member states must vote in favor of the legislation. This is a move that seems highly likely to occur, due to the overwhelming support for the resolution in the EU Parliament. The commission is expected to provide official legislation as early as June 2021.
According to international law firm Shearman and Sterling, the "proposed due diligence framework targets three categories of 'potential and/or actual adverse impacts,'" including "human rights," the environment, and "good governance."
These categories are deliberately broad and would in many cases require businesses to make sweeping reforms to align with left-wing goals, imposing them on the societies in which they operate. For example, the "human rights" category "means any potential or actual adverse impact that may impair the full enjoyment of human rights by individuals or groups of individuals in relation to human rights, including social, worker and trade union rights."
Protecting the environment would involve, according to Shearman and Sterling, "the right to a safe, clean, healthy, sustainable and biodiverse environment" as defined by "internationally recognized and EU environmental standards."
Further, the resolution demands that business "strategies should be aligned with ... the European Green Deal, and the commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, and Union international policy, especially the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Paris Agreement," among other standards.
Perhaps most importantly for Americans and U.S. businesses, the Parliament's resolution calls for these ESG requirements to cover all of a business' activities, including its "value chain."
The "value chain" is defined in the resolution as "all activities, operations, business relationships and investment chains of an undertaking and includes entities with which the undertaking has a direct or indirect business relationship, upstream and downstream, and which either: (a) supply products, parts of products or services that contribute to the undertaking's own products or services, or (b) receive products or services from the undertaking."
...
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:57 pm to Crimson Wraith
The world economic forum can gargle my sack.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:57 pm to Crimson Wraith
Europe doesn’t have the Bill of Rights and France is already setting up a Revolution.
The Tree of Liberty is thirsty and the unfortunate but necessary task of watering her is quickly approaching
The Tree of Liberty is thirsty and the unfortunate but necessary task of watering her is quickly approaching
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 2:59 pm to Crimson Wraith
I saw a soy boy wearing a “build back better” tee shirt.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:00 pm to Crimson Wraith
AZ audit needs to hurry up....
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:02 pm to Crimson Wraith
The left: The Great Reset is a racist dog whistle conspiracy theory.
World Economic Forum: Hold My (empty cup of chicken broth)
World Economic Forum: Hold My (empty cup of chicken broth)
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:03 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a 'Great Reset' of capitalism."
When I think of Capitalism, I usually don't think of the Chinese govt. Or much of Europe, these days....
Anyway- what's this "Must" crap? What will the Eurotrash do if we say no- invade us??
Response:
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:04 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Europe doesn’t have the Bill of Rights
Should be obvious by now that the Bill of Rights/Constitution have become irrelevant to the majority of our judiciary
This post was edited on 5/5/21 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:08 pm to td01241
There wouldn’t be much of these European countries or African or Asian countries if not for Americans so they can kiss a$$ this time
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:09 pm to Cosmo
quote:
the Bill of Rights/Constitution have become irrelevant
They haven't yet, but they will very soon... I have said it the entire time, the 2A is the key and they have to get rid of that before they can push their reset button and globalize...
I am just hoping there will be enough in this country willing to stand the frick up...
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:09 pm to Crimson Wraith
So John Kerry went over the head of our Constitution and committed the US to the Great Reset? How treasonous of him.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:10 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
So does that mean they go back to the 1800’s while we stay current ?
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:12 pm to markinkaty
quote:
So John Kerry went over the head of our Constitution and committed the US to the Great Reset? How treasonous of him.
Probably a suggestion from his Home Office in Tehran.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:12 pm to Crimson Wraith
In the words of OzzyMan, "yeah, nah!"
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:17 pm to canyon
Every known "globalist" within our government- starting with that dipsh*t John Kerry- should be thrown out on their arse if not arrested.
Enough of this BS. We are NOT "citizens of the world" or European subjects. That issue was settled a long time ago.
Imprison anyone attempting to shackle us with that again.
Enough of this BS. We are NOT "citizens of the world" or European subjects. That issue was settled a long time ago.
Imprison anyone attempting to shackle us with that again.
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:19 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
the "golden opportunity" for societal change created by the COVID-19 pandemic
"Conspiracy Theory"
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:56 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Should be obvious by now that the Bill of Rights/Constitution have become irrelevant to the majority of our judiciary
Doesn’t change the fact that many of us understand what it’s like to have those rights and the second amendment guarantees our populace is armed against tyranny
Posted on 5/5/21 at 3:57 pm to Crimson Wraith
Two weeks behind Italy.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News