Started By
Message

re: "The emergency declaration to build the wall sets a bad precedent"

Posted on 3/4/19 at 6:59 am to
Posted by Mrtommorrow1987
Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2008
13454 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 6:59 am to
The smell of your moms vagina sets a bad precedent.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8962 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 7:03 am to
Then stop following Obama’s crooked path and return our country to the separation of powers on which we were founded
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:01 am to
quote:

No matter how much the people who have their guy in power want it to be
please tell me you don't actually believe trump supporters want him to be dictator. if so, then you don't understand conservatives or the importance of what trump has done at all
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:04 am to
quote:

2. You think when dems take back power they are going to play by the rules?


Then why don’t we just cut this off at the head and install Trump as a dictator able to rule by fiat until he retires? I mean if it’s for the good of the country then we should ignore any constitutional concerns, right?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:05 am to
Me: The emergency declaration to build a wall sets a bad precedent.

You: What about what Obama did?

Me: Do you like Obama?

You: No.

Me:

You:

Me: Figure it out yet?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42192 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:06 am to
You seem to be in EVERY one of these threads.

Why are you so worked up about the declaration?
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
30951 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Then stop following Obama’s crooked path and return our country to the separation of powers on which we were founded

What do you people not understand? Trump not using the powers Obama gifted him in no way ends the abuse of presidential powers. He'd be negligent not to. But the House is welcome to present legislation to limit presidential powers and neuter the NEA. Will they? NO. Cause they want to abuse the shite out of it when they get the Presidency again despite anything Trump does or doesn't do. BUT...If Trump goes balls deep on them again and again with it, they'll beg for it to end. Presto!!!! Trump gets what he wants and we need, legislation to limit the Presidential powers enacted into law. We're protected from future abuses. Unless a LAW is changed. Which isn't impossible, just much more difficult.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84820 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:06 am to
quote:

we should ignore any constitutional concerns, right?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:10 am to
because I’m eating breakfast and just killing time.

But also because my biggest concern with Trump was him pushing constitutional boundaries. I don’t care if he got the wall through the normal legislative process. It’s trying to circumvent the normal process that has me concerned.
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 11:11 am
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:10 am to
It’s for the good of the country, Jbird. It’s either Trump or socialism so we’ve gotta have all hands on deck
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78284 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:13 am to
most people don’t want checks and balances

They want to pick their own dictator.

I dont Think you can say “well this is practical” and “this isn’t what the founding fathers indented”
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 11:15 am
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
30951 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Me: The emergency declaration to build a wall sets a bad precedent. You: What about what Obama did? Me: Do you like Obama? You: No.

Me: So, I'm good with Trump giving them a taste of their
own medicine and bringing it into the spotlight.

You: Hypocrite.

Me: No. I'm a realist. They thought they'd never lose.
They did. Now you take that stick Obama crammed up
our arse, and return the favor but deeper and with a
twisting motion.

You:
Blah blah Blah

Me: Then THEY get the message, realize the err of their
ways and bring legislation to limit presidential
powers and neuter or better define what is allowed
by the NEA. Senate approves. President signs.
Problem solved.

You: But that's not the right way you hypocrite. Have
you no principles?

Me: Yes, I do have principles. But I'm not fricking
retarded to think the Dem's will be nice in the
future if we're nice now. History has proven that
time and time again. They are all about winning at
all cost.

You: :some bullshite yada yada:

Me: My way brings the subject into the spotlight,
teaches the left a lesson about how your own
bullshite can be used against you so tread care-
fully in the future AND leads to BIPARTISAN
actions to limit future abuses/misuses of the
powers of the executive branch. Everybody wins.

Me: Figure it out yet?
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 11:23 am
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:31 am to
quote:

What the hell was DACA?


Not an emergency declaration.

quote:

You think when dems take back power they are going to play by the rules?


They will, but thank you for making this now part of the rules.

Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58308 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:43 am to
where was your bitching when Obama, Bush, Clinton, LBJ, and FDR was doing this
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26321 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:47 am to
You are wrong! It is not overreach to protect the country. That is exactly what he swore an oath to do!!!
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:51 am to
Poor job by you.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116740 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

2. You think when dems take back power they are going to play by the rules?


THIS!!!!
Precedent is irrelevant when dealing with Dems.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
30951 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Poor job by you.

Excellent retort Hemingway.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 12:02 pm to
Doing what? Declaring national emergencies?

It’s the substance of the declaration, not the declaration itself.

Just like you didn’t like the ACA when it was passed. Tons of laws had been passed before it, but it wasn’t the fact that it was a law that you disliked; you disliked the substance of it. Same thing here.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Blah blah Blah
You didn’t do it well. I stopped reading halfway through. Very unimpressive.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram