Started By
Message

re: The decline of religious faith in America and what that means for our future

Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:38 am to
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3429 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:38 am to
quote:

Not everything stated in the Bible is meant to be a positive thing to emulate. Lot was a sinner like everyone else in the Bible, except for Jesus.


And the LORD said, “If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will spare the whole place for their sake. (Gen 18:26)

and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the sensual conduct of the wicked (2 Peter 2:7)

I don’t know. Bible seems pretty clear that Lot was righteous both before the deeds I mentioned and after those deeds. Yet, he was a pretty immoral person by today’s standards… offering his daughters to be gang raped and all.

I agree with you that Jesus behaved quite morally.

quote:

The morality of the Bible is that which reflects God's character, and lying, incest, and murder are not in God's character.


I’m going to have to sort of disagree with you there. YHWH lies all throughout the Bible. He is a very untruthful god. First he tells Adam and Eve that if they eat from the tree of knowledge that they will surely die. The serpent actually corrects YHWH Elohim’s lie. And come on… murder not in God’s (YHWH) character? Seriously? Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, plagues Egypt and kills all their first borns, kills the Egyptian army by drowning them, kills thousands of Israelites after making the golden calf, kills Aaron’s two sons for burning strange fire, sanctions genocide on whole Canaanite nations, commands that if anyone ever sees an Amelekite that they must kill them… etc etc etc etc

ETA: I’ve seen the argument that all those killings were not murder, but rather justified fealty penalty for being wicked. Chew on this next one from 1 Samuel 15:3, and see if you can do some mental gymnastics about how God commanded killing of infants is moral and just.

Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destructiona all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 6:52 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:40 am to
quote:

We are going to find out just how well their man made “morals” hold up.



2070? I’m 61, so I won’t find out!
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 6:41 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:45 am to
quote:

objective moral truth This doesn't exist.




So why have any laws? Why not simply let the strong take what he wants from the weak without legal repercussions?
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 6:51 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:49 am to
quote:

First he tells Adam and Eve that if they eat from the tree of knowledge that they will surely die.


They would have lived forever had they obeyed God, but when they sinned, their bodies instantly started to die and they did die. This isn’t a lie at all, but your inability to decipher scripture correctly.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 6:50 am
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:51 am to
That's the fault of the Religion's leadership.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 6:53 am to
quote:

That's the fault of the Religion's leadership.


Part of it, but we can’t escape personal responsibly and choice as well.
It’s like saying I refuse to vote because there is some fraud.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 6:56 am
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3429 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:54 am to
quote:

when they sinned, their bodies instantly started to die and they did die. This isn’t a lie at all, but your inability to decipher scripture correctly.


“but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Gen 2:17)

“Thus all the days that Adam lived were 930 years, and he died.” (Gen 5:5)

I don’t have to decipher it. Just have to read it and comprehend it, which you seem to not be able to do.
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8689 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:55 am to
quote:

more troubled and self serving society.


More like Concentration Camps, not unlike Auchwitiz-Birkenau.

You cringe? Heck, they're already calling for the killing of MAGA folks.

Godless heathens are capable of great evil. As we are beginning to witness now.



This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 8:52 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:32 am to
quote:

So why have any laws? Why not simply let the strong take what he wants from the weak without legal repercussions?


In a perfect world, we'd have no need for laws or government.

But, over time, people have demonstrated a need to be governed by others within a mostly acceptable framework.

We have laws for the same reason we have religion: people are stupid and need someone to tell them what to do.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

I don’t have to decipher it. Just have to read it and comprehend it, which you seem to not be able to do.


You are ignoring the greater truth and making the same mistake as Nicodemus. When Jesus told him he must be born again, Nicodemus’ first response was,” how can I go back into my mother’s womb?” That’s because he was only thinking about physical things and not things of the Sprit. Though it’s true what I said about their bodies dying physically because they were cast out of the garden and kept from the tree of life, there was an immediate spiritual death, and that’s why Adam and Eve tried to hide from God.
Dying spiritually was much worse than their future physical death.
So no, God didn’t lie to them, Satan did.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 9:01 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:02 am to
quote:

But, over time, people have demonstrated a need to be governed by others within a mostly acceptable framework.


So you are saying man simply invented morality?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:08 am to
quote:

So you are saying man simply invented morality?


No, I wouldn't say it's been simple. I wouldn't say it's been "invented," either, considering how fluid it is.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46018 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:25 am to
quote:

And the LORD said, “If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I will spare the whole place for their sake. (Gen 18:26)

and if he rescued righteous Lot, greatly distressed by the sensual conduct of the wicked (2 Peter 2:7)

I don’t know. Bible seems pretty clear that Lot was righteous both before the deeds I mentioned and after those deeds. Yet, he was a pretty immoral person by today’s standards… offering his daughters to be gang raped and all.
First, Lot didn't offer his daughters to the crowd because he was heartless and didn't care what happened to them. He did it because he was trying to appease the crowds so that they didn't harm the messengers of God. This is an example of good intentions (wanting to save God's messengers) being overshadowed by bad actions (offering his daughters). It shows that Lot was both righteous and a sinner, or simul justus et peccator (at the same time just as well as sinful). How can this be?

First, according to the scriptures, no one is righteous, not one (Romans 3:10). And yet, righteousness is counted according to faith, as Abraham (a sinner) was considered righteous because he believed God's promises (Romans 4:3). These promises were fulfilled ultimately in Jesus Christ, which is why anyone is considered "righteous" before God, in the Old Testament or the New. The OT people of God looked forward to the promised Messiah by faith, and the NT people of God looked backwards to what Christ (the Messiah) did on the cross.

Lot was justified because he shared the same faith of Abraham, not because he was sinless.

quote:

I’m going to have to sort of disagree with you there. YHWH lies all throughout the Bible. He is a very untruthful god. First he tells Adam and Eve that if they eat from the tree of knowledge that they will surely die. The serpent actually corrects YHWH Elohim’s lie.
God does not lie and He cannot lie (Num. 23:19).

What God told Adam and Eve was the truth, in two ways. First, from the moment they sinned by eating of the fruit of the tree that they were forbidden to eat from, they died spiritually. That is, they no longer had spiritual communion with God and had to receive God's mercy and grace to have that communion again.

Secondly, their sin made them mortal, where they could (and would) die physically. Had they obeyed God, they would have lived forever, physically, but their sin caused them to start dying physically from the moment they disobeyed.

God did not lie.

quote:

And come on… murder not in God’s (YHWH) character? Seriously? Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, plagues Egypt and kills all their first borns, kills the Egyptian army by drowning them, kills thousands of Israelites after making the golden calf, kills Aaron’s two sons for burning strange fire, sanctions genocide on whole Canaanite nations, commands that if anyone ever sees an Amelekite that they must kill them… etc etc etc etc

ETA: I’ve seen the argument that all those killings were not murder, but rather justified fealty penalty for being wicked.
If you've seen the argument, then why do you continue to call those things "murder"? What is murder, anyway? Is it not the unlawful killing of a person? If God is the law giver, and He is the judge, and He has the authority to destroy His creations as He pleases, and especially if they are guilty under the law He has given them, then how is it murder for God to take the lives of anyone?

All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23), and the soul that sins shall die (Ezekiel 18:20). All sin, therefore all deserve death. How is God a murderer for giving anyone what we all deserve?

quote:

Chew on this next one from 1 Samuel 15:3, and see if you can do some mental gymnastics about how God commanded killing of infants is moral and just.

Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destructiona all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.
Again, all are guilty before God, either by our own sins, or by the sins of Adam, our federal head in the flesh. All children are born with a sinful nature and disposition inherited ultimately from Adam, their representative. Because of this, they are not innocent. God is just in taking the lives of any of His creation. He owes us nothing except what He promises to do.

God is not unjust or unrighteous for punishing sinners of any age. He is not a liar, and He is not a murderer. His character is the standard for moral perfection, and we are in no place to judge God.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3429 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:51 am to
Take something totally immoral - if it is commanded by God then it becomes moral. I’ve heard the argument, but I just disagree with it. I consider killing innocent babies to be immoral. You on the other hand consider killing of babies - as long as God does it or commands it - to be moral and perfectly acceptable. That’s why religious faith is declining in America.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:52 am to
People talk of the Bible as being simple. No, it is very complex and contains substantial depth but you have to be able to recognize it. IMO, the Bible is beyond the full understanding of youth and most younger adults. It takes adult experience, some wisdom and a real desire to reason the message out to begin to recognize the depth and complexity of the Bible.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26950 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

I consider killing innocent babies to be immoral.


So you have a crutch, just like religious people.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62019 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 10:13 am to
quote:

I consider killing innocent babies to be immoral.



But that’s only if you don’t possess prefect foreknowledge and know exactly what that baby would have become if allowed to live. We aren’t God and lack this ability.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 10:25 am
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 10:19 am to
quote:

This doesn't exist.


You don’t believe objective moral truth exists.

Your self righteous cocky self sits in the middle of a safe prosperous country that was created in the confines of objective moral truth. Without this construct it’s doubtful you would even be in a position to say there is no objective moral truth.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 10:21 am to
quote:

You don’t believe objective moral truth exists.


Belief has nothing to do with it.

quote:

Your self righteous cocky self sits in the middle of a safe prosperous country that was created in the confines of objective moral truth.


This country was founded on secularism.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 10:25 am to
quote:

This country was founded on secularism.


bullshite! It literally says so in the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence.

People like you have yet to prove you can create a prosperous, moral, long lasting society that isn’t in some way shape or form rooted in objective moral principles.

When you do, I’ll start to pay attention.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 10:27 am
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram