- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The country would have been better long term with HRC
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:22 am to Fat Bastard
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:22 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
so hillary woulda fixed trade?
Please show me ONE trade deal that Trump has gotten passed.
He talked a lot about what a good negotiator he is, and we would be getting the best deals, I haven't seen ONE good deal he's made. As far as negotiating, I think the current shutdown is a good indicator that he's a TERRIBLE negotiator, his position is simply, "Give me what I want!" No negotiating, no deal making, just demands and bluster.
quote:
brought back manufacturing jobs?
Chart: US factory jobs as a share of US payrolls have been in steady decline for 75 years starting in 1943, and it’s not because of trade
quote:
fixed taxes and regs?
Really? You think taxes and regs are "fixed"?
What are you, some Big Government lover? quote:
GLOBALIST
I don't think that word means what you think it does.
quote:
f you lefties are just plain STUPID
And you're just a propaganda loving tool.
0
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:23 am to boogiewoogie1978
Progressives cry for change, get Obama, no change....fast forward, a complete outsider is elected and Progs lose their minds.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:26 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
The country wouldn't have been much different then it is now. Similar economy, foreign policy, etc.
Sure there would be some differences but close to the same.
However the hatred Trump has drawn out is gonna have major long term effects. Especially in 2020 when the Dems win the election.
Their need to "get even" is going to push the most liberal agenda in American history. We are going to move far left too fast and all because of Trump.
And there you have it, folks. One of our resident board “centrists”.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:28 am to boogiewoogie1978
It’s time to fertilize the tree of liberty...soon!
Posted on 1/17/19 at 10:35 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Similar economy
Wrong, no tax cuts no real growth. Unemployment would still be around the Obama levels.
quote:
foreign policy
Wrong. We would not have North Korea where they are, would not be pulling out of Syria, would still be in the endless wars, only not hitting the enemy as hard.
Plus, the amount of gun control legislation passed would be scary. Add to that the USSC picks and you are just wrong across the board.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:09 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
boogiewoogie1978
MAGA 
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:11 am to boogiewoogie1978
How exactly would we be better off with higher taxes, more regulation, more shitty foreign policy, and Hillary getting to fill at least 3 vacancies on SCOTUS?
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:15 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Hear me out
No way you Snowflake, a hole SOB liberal bleeding MF.....
Please take your MELT to a liberal board which consists of deaf people like you..
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:14 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:I'll never understand people that think losing is the path to success.
Their need to "get even" is going to push the most liberal agenda in American history. We are going to move far left too fast and all because of Trump.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:16 pm to boogiewoogie1978
EaD
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:18 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
foreign policy
Clinton is a hyper-interventionist whose foreign policy positions are in line with the neocon Never Trumpers. There isn't a war or intervention she's voted against or opposed. That alone is why she shouldn't be anywhere near the Oval Office.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:18 pm to boogiewoogie1978
So you're saying Dems are far more petty and vengeful than Republicans
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:19 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:One establishment puppet or the other, does it really matter which one?
The country would have been better long term with HRC
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:20 pm to boogiewoogie1978
The country would have been better long term with HRC
I predict your thread will set the Tigerdroppings record for the most down votes ever
I predict your thread will set the Tigerdroppings record for the most down votes ever
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:21 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:For 2-plus years, Trump has carried on with the establishment agenda in the Middle East. He's even extended it into Yemen, where he helps the Saudis commit genocide.
foreign policy
Clinton is a hyper-interventionist whose foreign policy positions are in line with the neocon Never Trumpers. There isn't a war or intervention she's voted against or opposed. That alone is why she shouldn't be anywhere near the Oval Office.
What would the Old Hag have done differently?
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:21 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
He's even extended it into Yemen
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:24 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
However the hatred Trump has drawn out is gonna have major long term effects. Especially in 2020 when the Dems win the election. Their need to "get even" is going to push the most liberal agenda in American history. We are going to move far left too fast and all because of Trump.
The economy would have been trash under HRC. However, I do agree with these last 2 sentences and am cringing at the thought that someone like Bernie or other far left politicians will draw more support in the backlash against Trump
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:28 pm to TX Tiger
Well, one of those people would be too busy selling access to the White House to care about the well-being of the country, the other is now President.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:28 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:You mean if Hillary would have been President, the Phat Phuk wouldn't have blown a hole in the side of a mountain, resulting in China forcing him to stop? What does one have to do with the other?
foreign policy
Wrong. We would not have North Korea where they are,
quote:We aren't.
would not be pulling out of Syria,
quote:We still are.
would still be in the endless wars,
quote:The enemy? What a joke. Trump is protecting the enemy. And I don't know if even Hillary would be helping the Saudis commit genocide in Yemen the way Trump is.
only not hitting the enemy as hard.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:33 pm to oogabooga68
quote:This pair of filth was cut from the same cloth. I can't imagine much difference in the big picture.
Well, one of those people would be too busy selling access to the White House to care about the well-being of the country, the other is now President.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News