- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Swetnick "I would not take one of those glasses from Bart Kavanaugh"
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:01 pm to Vecchio Cane
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:01 pm to Vecchio Cane
quote:
We need to see a list of people who don't understand what evidence and proof and corroboration mean
I have never said I believe Swetnick's story of multiple gang bangs.
I see you are all twisted up about the lack of due process for Kavanaugh. If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
3
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:05 pm to texridder
quote:
If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
Do you think the Senate doesn't have subpoena power over him if they wanted him to do so?
You have the concept backwards either way, you realize?
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:07 pm to texridder
quote:
If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:09 pm to texridder
quote:As soon as Blowsy can identify the room and successfully name a witness that was there... you’ll have a point.
If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:10 pm to Y.A. Tittle
This fairy tale is a national embarrassment, hope it costs the Dems a helluva lot
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:11 pm to BoomBoomBoom
quote:
I love that talk.....baby talk
It’s called “vocal fry” speech........
I believe good old Ford fart doesn’t speak like that when she gives her lectures.....
Maybe one of her past students will speak up and expose her fake baby talk?
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:19 pm to Jbird
quote:
When talk of Judge's book came out with the Bart O'Kavavaugh character, I looked around to see why he called the character Bart.
Can you post a coherent sentence?
Nope. You don't know jach shite, that's why all you do is post emojis.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:25 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Do you think the Senate doesn't have subpoena power over him if they wanted him to do so?
What does that have to do with it?
quote:
You have the concept backwards either way, you realize?
I don't have the concept backward. She is being accused of being a liar and coming forward because she is being paid or because her claim is politically motivated.
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:26 pm to texridder
RexTitter believes!
Posted on 10/2/18 at 8:13 pm to texridder
quote:
We all know your nickname is Wide Receiver
Is that some of the same kind of jargon as "Devil's Triangle", or is it a quarters game too.
I heard it’s a Dem Soy Boy rite of passage
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News