- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study: States that raised minimum wage had stronger job growth
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:20 pm to TT9
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:20 pm to TT9
I'm messing with ya. 
But for real....they wanted higher wages. Let's see if we get better performance. I don't really eat fast food, but I do like Popeyes on occasion. They never ever get it right.
Eta: Pleaseeeee free Vols&Shaft83
But for real....they wanted higher wages. Let's see if we get better performance. I don't really eat fast food, but I do like Popeyes on occasion. They never ever get it right.
Eta: Pleaseeeee free Vols&Shaft83
This post was edited on 7/10/14 at 7:21 pm
2
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:21 pm to MSCoastTigerGirl
I figured you were.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:25 pm to TT9
Do you know where I can find the study itself?
I mean, it flat out admits it's unscientific, so it's a little hard to take this as "proof" that the minimum wage doesn't hurt job growth. Yet it seems that plenty on the left in this thread accept it out of hand and plenty on the right in this thread reject it out of hand without even looking at how the study was conducted.
I mean, it flat out admits it's unscientific, so it's a little hard to take this as "proof" that the minimum wage doesn't hurt job growth. Yet it seems that plenty on the left in this thread accept it out of hand and plenty on the right in this thread reject it out of hand without even looking at how the study was conducted.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:30 pm to GoBigOrange86
I found it.
LINK
This isn't a study at all. It's just comparing rates of growth in states that raised the minimum wage to states that didn't. It is entirely correlational and involves no scientific analysis. To call this a "study" at all is highly misleading and bordering on preposterous.
LINK
This isn't a study at all. It's just comparing rates of growth in states that raised the minimum wage to states that didn't. It is entirely correlational and involves no scientific analysis. To call this a "study" at all is highly misleading and bordering on preposterous.
This post was edited on 7/10/14 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:31 pm to GoBigOrange86
quote:
This isn't a study at all. It's just comparing rates of growth in states that raised the minimum wage to states that didn't. It is entirely correlational
ahhh...good ole:
post hoc ergo propter hoc
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:31 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:TUba, you are a smart, scientifically oriented person. If you were running a study analyzing the effects of min. wage on the economy of a state, which approach makes more sense:
SpidermanTUba
A) comparing the state's economy with a state in which MW did not rise,
or
B) comparing the growth of a state before MW went into effect, and after it went into effect.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:This is the proper area to start in, and then after compiling years worth of data, you then move to comparing the outcomes between the two subsets, those who increased MW and those who didn't.
B) comparing the growth of a state before MW went into effect, and after it went into effect.
This post was edited on 7/10/14 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:34 pm to MSCoastTigerGirl
quote:
Eta: Pleaseeeee free Vols&Shaft83
Coastie, this begging is unseemly.
I heart the hell out of Vols&Shaft. But, c'mon. It really isn't that difficult to NOT get banned.
He will be back after his "time out". but, he obviously needed one
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:35 pm to Scruffy
quote:The study did no such thing. It literally just compared growth rates of states at one time.
This is the proper area to start in, and then after compiling years worth of data, you then move to comparing the outcomes between the two subsets, those who increased MW and those who didn't.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:38 pm to Scruffy
TT rex tuba and VB all know this but they seem to just have given up the ghost because they fight back at the idiots around here and loose all...I can't find the word.
Debate is dead around here for the most part. It gets polluted by drive-by BS.
I would take a thousand more awants than one of those guys.
Debate is dead around here for the most part. It gets polluted by drive-by BS.
I would take a thousand more awants than one of those guys.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:41 pm to GoBigOrange86
quote:
This isn't a study at all. It's just comparing rates of growth in states that raised the minimum wage to states that didn't. It is entirely correlational and involves no scientific analysis. To call this a "study" at all is highly misleading and bordering on preposterous.
It compounds its issues by averaging the legislatively changed MW states with the inflation-adjusted MW states.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:41 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Come on BHP. 
You know I'm not literally begging.
And I know he will be back. He is good people.
You know I'm not literally begging.
And I know he will be back. He is good people.
Posted on 7/10/14 at 7:47 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 7/10/14 at 9:00 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
Mayo gets a bad rap
You really are a cornball brother
Posted on 7/10/14 at 9:30 pm to TT9
Do you believe any goverment funded study.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News