- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Strzok outted himself. Stated ignored the calls from team to slow roll to protect sources
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 7/14/18 at 1:50 pm
This has been the most ignored and over looked part of his testimony.
- He states that his team explained that the polls showed Trump losing, so there was no need in risking sources by doing this aggressively.
- He in turn tells them they would aggressively go after it.
- and the major issue is he set himself up for this. So let's start with that:
Now here he is again:
LINK
- He states that his team explained that the polls showed Trump losing, so there was no need in risking sources by doing this aggressively.
- He in turn tells them they would aggressively go after it.
- and the major issue is he set himself up for this. So let's start with that:
quote:
“That text represented a debate on information that we had received from an extraordinarily sensitive source and method and that typically when something is that sensitive if you take action on it you put it at risk. And so there is a tension there. Maybe we should just roll slow. Take a typical 3, 4-year counterintelligence investigation because the more aggressive you are the more you put it at risk.
Now here he is again:
quote:.
Some people said, hey, look. Every poll is saying candidate Trump is likely not to win. Every Republican was saying that. Some people said as a result of that let’s not risk the source. Let’s go slow. But I indicated for them. We need to aggressively investigate these actions, because you know what, if candidate Trump is elected, there might be people we need to be investigating that might be nominated for important security positions.
LINK
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:12 pm to Jjdoc
I'm not following your point. Can you clarify?
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:14 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
We need to aggressively investigate these actions, because you know what, if candidate Trump is elected, there might be people we need to be investigating that might be nominated for important security positions
Nice fail jjdoc
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:17 pm to bmy
quote:
Nice fail jjdoc
He failed at posting direct quotes? I think that shoe is on your foot.
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:38 pm to bmy
You are such a hateful troll.
Thanks for posting.
Your hate amuses me.
WINNING! MAGA!
Thanks for posting.
Your hate amuses me.
WINNING! MAGA!
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:38 pm to Jjdoc
I just wonder who this "extraoridnarily sensitive" source was. Surely PapaD, a volunteer low level coffee boy would not be considered such. And Halper never did anything but harass Papa and Page (and get nothing).
So who is it? What if Roger Stone was FBI the whole time? Lawl
So who is it? What if Roger Stone was FBI the whole time? Lawl
Posted on 7/14/18 at 2:48 pm to moneyg
quote:
I'm not following your point. Can you clarif
I can. He stated he did not allow his bias to interfere with his work.
Clearly his team and those around him was pointing out that Trump was not a threat to win, so "slow Roll" it to keep Sources and Methods SAFE...…. and that is the general way of doing things.
He told them no.
This post was edited on 7/14/18 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 7/14/18 at 3:34 pm to Jjdoc
Strzok isn't wrong. Mr Russian troll
Posted on 7/14/18 at 3:41 pm to TJGator1215
He let his bias guide him baby Stalinist
Posted on 7/14/18 at 3:55 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
there might be people we need to be investigating that might be nominated for important security positions.
Then you simply don't grant them security clearance. /problem
But you absolutely don't attempt to subvert the entire American election process, as a reason for you not to have to run background checks one day on these mythical people.
That statement alone should be 'exhibit A' in showing his bias
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News