- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: st.george: we have enough signatures for election.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 1:43 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 8/25/14 at 1:43 pm to CptBengal
quote:Where did I mention 'location'? Geography is NOT location.
you rarely see two cities which have exactly the same location
Damn, you're even more stupid today than usual.
I won't reply to you again in this thread, fwiw.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 1:44 pm to CptBengal
quote:
then what are you so worried about?
2 bureaucracies competing against one another
Posted on 8/25/14 at 1:45 pm to member12
quote:You really are intelligence challenged if you can't follow the discussion comparing Zachary to SG.
This is hilarious. Russian has retreated to suggesting that the reason St George shouldn't be a city is because of an undefinable term
I see you didn't answer my question. Or, is that my answer? Got it. Thanks.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 1:46 pm to LSURussian
quote:
I won't reply to you again in this thread, fwiw.
so you wont answer my question on "identity". I get that, it was a pathetically weak argument and you got trounced pretty fast by a number of posters.
At least you didnt go with Winston and the absurd race angle, gotta give you that at least.
You seem even more shrill than usual about StG. I hope that these people can see their ideas be put to vote in the public forum. Such is a great way to let the people decide. Let them stand or fall on their merits. You, however, seem hell bent on making sure that those people dont have an avenue to bring their ideas to the public forum. It shows a lot about who you are, and what you stand to lose.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:00 pm to member12
quote:
then he resorts to name calling when he's challenged
It's predictable. He does it in pretty much every one of these threads. He conveniently ignores how many times he has posted inaccurate information regarding SG.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:01 pm to CptBengal
If St. George happens, but BR gets to keep the mall, perkins rowe, the casino, etc.,then St. George will have to raise taxes. If St. George gets to keep these areas, then BR will have to raise taxes. Either way no one wins by separating the two. It seems that St. George is only concerned with strengthening themselves, without regard to what happens to their neighbor, Baton Rouge. But do the supporters of St. George realize that when they weaken the city of Baton Rouge, and it's schools, that the problems Baton Rouge will face will bleed over to St. George? Or will St. George build a wall to separate themselves from Baton Rouge?
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:04 pm to SBJesus11
quote:
SBJesus11
Prepare yourself.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:14 pm to SBJesus11
quote:Or, SG can just refuse to pay legacy cost and call it even.
If St. George happens, but BR gets to keep the mall, perkins rowe, the casino, etc.,then St. George will have to raise taxes
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:22 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
I don't think legal costs equals that kind of revenue
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:23 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:As if they were ever going to pay legacy costs without a court ordering them to do so......
Or, SG can just refuse to pay legacy cost
Just like Central has ignored their similar, pre-incorporation commitment thus far.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:23 pm to SBJesus11
quote:"Legacy" not "legal."
I don't think legal costs equals that kind of revenue
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:38 pm to Sprocket46
Will only people in the possible St. George area vote on this?
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:39 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:To incorporate, yes.
Will only people in the possible St. George area vote on this?
Posted on 8/25/14 at 2:42 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
To incorporate, yes.
ok, so that means I will not vote on it. I don't think. Riverbed is right on the border according to the map I saw a couple months ago. (meaning I won't be in St. George city, rather Baton Rouge.)
Posted on 8/25/14 at 3:07 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
that means I will not vote on it. I don't think. Riverbed is right on the border according to the map I saw a couple months ago.
If you mean Riverbend subdivision off of Brightside Lane, it is in the city limits of Baton Rouge.
Only unincorporated areas are included in the SG incorporation petition.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 3:10 pm to LSURussian
quote:
And once the MoL was removed from SG's greedy hands (and there will be other annexations before a vote is held), BR will be just fine with its finances.
Then what basis do you have to oppose it? Are you just fundamentally opposed to self-governance?
Posted on 8/25/14 at 3:12 pm to LSURussian
quote:
The L'Auberge Casino will soon follow along with Perkins Rowe
Baton Rouge will then have a drain on the people and a bankrupt development. Yay, BR!
Posted on 8/25/14 at 3:16 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Will only people in the possible St. George area vote on this?
Yep, Russian doesn't get a vote. He only gets to cry on Tigerdroppings.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 3:19 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Explain how creating another layer of local government 'shrinks' government.
It creates a more local government for the people of St. George.
That's a good thing for the people of St. George.
Popular
Back to top


1




