Started By
Message

re: Stephen Miller- administration considering suspending habeas corpus

Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3800 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

So what are the chances the judiciary is the one institution in all of America immune to, as SPF labeled it, the massive expansion of emotional thinking?


it's a slippery slope - if a decision doesn't go my way, it's the "SCOTUS was emotional and didn't follow the law because they are liberal deep state."

if the decision does go my way, "oh SCOTUS is cool."

this is evident EVERY DAY on this board with the MAGA knuckleheads. Where does it stop?
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22663 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

it's a slippery slope - if a decision doesn't go my way, it's the "SCOTUS was emotional and didn't follow the law because they are liberal deep state."

if the decision does go my way, "oh SCOTUS is cool."

this is evident EVERY DAY on this board with the MAGA knuckleheads. Where does it stop?

You think it's different with the retards on the Left? In fact, I'd bet there are far more liberals that emote as you describe than there are on the MAGA train. FFS 50% of Democrats thought the supreme court overturning roe was going to result in the death of thousands.

But we're discussing the judiciary. The judiciary is right there with everybody/everything else on this slippery slope of emoting rather than thinking.
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3800 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

FFS 50% of Democrats thought the supreme court overturning roe was going to result in the death of thousands.


there is a different LSU David that is cool and smart and I am just now realizing that you are not him.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
6035 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:35 pm to
As a gay man, you have a lot to worry about when they suspend habeas corpus and open the camps.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22663 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

there is a different LSU David that is cool and smart and I am just now realizing that you are not him.

Why emote? Tell me I'm wrong, but you know I'm right. The Left dwarfs the Right in leading with their feelies.

And that ain't good. None of it is - Left or Right.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110861 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

You tell me. By their last name? Because they have an accent?


You think our country had never deported people before January of this year?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68125 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:49 pm to
I always laugh at that and you tend to see it on both sides. If someone disagrees with a court decision, the judge(s) is "activist" and "not following the Constitution."
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41684 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Incorrect. The Constitution was made to thwart the emotional swings of the mob.


It wasn’t meant to prevent us from saving our nation from tyrannical marxists either
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41684 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Show me the proof of the coordianted efforts of the governments of Honduras, Guatamala, El Salvador, and Mexico to show this invasion, please.


Coordination isn’t required for it to be an invasion.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37845 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

No. It isn’t ridiculous. Illegal aliens aren’t and shouldn’t be entitled to the same due process as American citizens

If the suspension of Habeus Corpus only applies to noncitizens who are here illegally, I'm good with it.

If it applies to citizens, I'm not sure that's a slippery slope we need to jump onto.
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3800 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

Why emote? Tell me I'm wrong, but you know I'm right. The Left dwarfs the Right in leading with their feelies.


I don't talk to people who use the word "retard" like it's a normal word to use.
Posted by Warrior Court
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2022
3800 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

If it applies to citizens, I'm not sure that's a slippery slope we need to jump onto.


I hope Trump finds a loophole for you and the country will be better off.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22663 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

I don't talk to people who use the word "retard" like it's a normal word to use.

And you worry about emotional MAGA.

As for the word "retard" - it's a word. It's not exotic. And it's a word.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41684 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Here's the fruit of the dishonest framing above Again, if you don't think that it's functioning correctly, there's a way to correct that and it's the amendment process


How exactly does an amendment get passed?

Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41684 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Only to people who see this as a team scenario and perceive the ruling to go against their team/in group and/or go for their opponent/out group.


The actors in this story see this as exactly that.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37424 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:12 pm to
How would you know if someone being detained was indeed here illegally if habeas corpus was suspended?
How would we know if this person was a citizen or not. The government would not be obliged to present formal charges...conceivably. They would not even have to necessarily be obliged to acknowledge that they have you in custody.

Just going for a slide on that slope
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85493 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

How would you know if someone being detained was indeed here illegally if habeas corpus was suspended?
How would we know if this person was a citizen or not. The government would not be obliged to present formal charges...conceivably. They would not even have to necessarily be obliged to acknowledge that they have you in custody.

Just going for a slide on that slope


Scalia understood this and acknowledged it. But Shane the welder thinks it bullshite.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37845 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

How would you know if someone being detained was indeed here illegally if habeas corpus was suspended?

Ask for proof of citizenship?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68125 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:18 pm to
Could you imagine if some Dem shitebag did these things? This board would be in 100% resistance mode.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22663 posts
Posted on 5/10/25 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

How would you know if someone being detained was indeed here illegally if habeas corpus was suspended?
How would we know if this person was a citizen or not. The government would not be obliged to present formal charges...conceivably. They would not even have to necessarily be obliged to acknowledge that they have you in custody.

Just going for a slide on that slope

When you do something 20 million times and it involves people on both ends, there will be mistakes made. Somewhere between perfection and not giving a shite as you deport, deport, deport is a rational place that hopefully DHS operates.

It's unfortunate the Left has put us in this position.
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram