- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stephen Miller- administration considering suspending habeas corpus
Posted on 5/10/25 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/10/25 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the person trying to invalidate our entire legal system
Beating truth at a brick wall of stupid is so tiring.
The courts legitimacy is a function of their work product.
The system invalidates itself, regardless of my efforts.
1
Posted on 5/10/25 at 8:46 am to Turbeauxdog
LINK
Slow thinks I'm some radical for trashing the legitimacy of our court system. A perfect example of his separation from reality.
Look at the shitholes you have to find comparison for the level of legitimacy of our court system.
Slow thinks I'm some radical for trashing the legitimacy of our court system. A perfect example of his separation from reality.
quote:
While confidence in U.S. courts is at its record low, it is still higher than what Gallup has previously measured in places such as Venezuela in 2016 (16%), Democratic Republic of Congo in 2013 (22%) or Syria in 2013 (25%).
Look at the shitholes you have to find comparison for the level of legitimacy of our court system.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 8:52 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
I'm some radical for trashing the legitimacy of our court system.
When you elevate any system to an almost religious reverence the discussion becomes one about beliefs rather than facts.
The high priests have not declared an invasion.
Therefore there is no invasion.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 8:58 am to TrueTiger
You do realize that even Trump appointed judges have ruled against the Administration, right…
Were they abducted and brainwashed by the “Deep State”? lol
Were they abducted and brainwashed by the “Deep State”? lol
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:00 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Look at the shitholes you have to find comparison for the level of legitimacy of our court system.
We're in a period of mass expansion of emotional thinking and shedding rationality, correct.
That's why you see so many of those types ITT supporting tyranny. For those who don't understand the bigger picture, that's the entire point.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:00 am to TrueTiger
quote:
When you elevate any system to an almost religious reverence
Strawman
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:05 am to VOR
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:07 am to TrueTiger
quote:
When you elevate any system to an almost religious reverence the discussion becomes one about beliefs rather than facts.
The high priests have not declared an invasion.
Therefore there is no invasion.
Dude, I respect you as a poster, but this is thick with irony.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:13 am to Bunk Moreland
Trump’s use of the term “invasion” twists the AEA like a fricking pretzel, and the court knows it.
If I thought their were millions of murderous Latino
gang members wandering our streets, I’d have a different opinion. But that’s a fiction. There are some bad guys around, no doubt, but nothing like the administration would have you believe.
If I thought their were millions of murderous Latino
gang members wandering our streets, I’d have a different opinion. But that’s a fiction. There are some bad guys around, no doubt, but nothing like the administration would have you believe.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:28 am to VOR
quote:
Trump’s use of the term “invasion” twists the AEA like a fricking pretzel, and the court knows it.
Millions of ppl entering our country illegally is an invasion dummy
Posted on 5/10/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strawman
"The courts have decided there is no invasion."
Argument to authority.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:04 am to TrueTiger
quote:
"The courts have decided there is no invasion."
Argument to authority.
No
That is literally their role in our constitutional system.
Or are we discussing fantasy and not our actual government? I thought we were discussing our actual government.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
You’ve already admitted in the past you wouldn’t want an illegal in your neighborhood but it’s okay for millions to come in.
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a. You're ignoring that I addressed the "Trump will use the term invasion" point directly. Dishonesty.
No, I didnt ignore it, I laughed at it. The dishonesty is all yours. Pretending that Grant didnt use the term rebellion to mask his obvious work-around in regards to a lack of judicial support for local law enforcement
So I guess I do need to define the word rebellion for you, You seem incapable of grasping reality, at this point
quote:
rebellion - violent action organized by a group of people who are trying to change the political system in their country
How was not bringing the Klan to justice in a few counties, a rebellion against the entire federal government? Yeah, it wasnt. But thats your dishonest take
By 1871 the actual rebellion had been put down. The Klan was nothing more than a criminal organization, similar to the mafia. No one was using arms against the federal govt, therefore putting down a rebellion wasnt happening. Yet Grant claimed it was
Just as your bizarre notion that 20M foreigners in a country cant be viewed as an invasion. There are only 3 US states that have populations that large. And a couple of those might not reach 20M, if all illegals were removed
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is literally their role in our constitutional system.
Very good.
And what is the purpose of our constitutional system?
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:18 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
You’ve already admitted in the past you wouldn’t want an illegal in your neighborhood but it’s okay for millions to come in.
I've never said it's okay for millions to come in
I've only argued that removing them has to follow our laws and Constitution
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:18 am to TrueTiger
quote:
And what is the purpose of our constitutional system?
To intentionally limit government and disperse its power along with the threat of democracy and the factions referenced in Federalists 9 and 10
This post was edited on 5/10/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
It is not the role of the Judiciary to decide whether or not we are under invasion
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:21 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
but this is thick with irony.
Why?
Are we supposed to believe the judges and ignore our eyes when we saw wave upon wave of thousands coming in day after day for years?
Posted on 5/10/25 at 10:24 am to Rip Torn
quote:It is totally clear that immigration is being used for 'invasion.
It is not the role of the Judiciary to decide whether or not we are under invasion
It is time for the invasion to be ceased - and any judiciary involved to act, or not, accordingly because large swathes of the judiciary is also an invasion
perpetrated by the same forces
Page 18 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News