- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stephen Hawking Dead - Hawking Radiation Proves Existence of God
Posted on 3/15/18 at 5:43 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 3/15/18 at 5:43 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Religion is the pinnacle of our self-involved nature.
No, that would be humanism
Another low information troll attempt.
MAGA
Posted on 3/15/18 at 5:48 am to mofungoo
quote:
No, that would be humanism
Explain what you think humanism is, and also why you think you're correct.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 5:49 am to mofungoo
quote:
So no answers = surrender.
Yes, you clearly conceded the point.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 6:15 am to Gaston
quote:
by Gaston
Oh geez, you found the close minded person of no worth. You get judgmental merit badge and the one that outs those who are unobservant.
I’ve read Hawking
Learning of Big Bang “Theory” led me closer to God. I thought who made the mass that “banged???” Who made the space for “bang” to occur? Who made “bang” if that’s truly what happened?
There had to be a creator! Had to be
Science is such great thought and theory and how it lacks the forethought to go all the way to beginning(or “CREATION!”) is totally baffling to me
To be a scientist seems as if it would force the theorist to see the realities of there needing to be a “creator”(they wouldn’t even have to say the word God) that created the mass they originate their theories with!? That creator is what many call God. I don’t understand this God and that’s ok too but I know there’s a creator
Hawking figured Bang had been expanding billions of years. How does he not wonder of the infinite space it expands in not coming from a creator?
In all Hawking’s brilliance he couldn’t let go and be thankful to a God Creator that allowing for the conditions of his theories to take place
Sad for him
I just hope that reaches one Atheist here. Perhaps you’re an agnostic instead of atheist. To me you have to admit a god in saying there’s no god in order to become atheist? If so, doesn’t that make you an open minded agnostic? Being agnostic is where I started. As I tried to then disprove god .... I proved there being a creator that I chose, eventually, to call GOD. It was a slow and long and painful walk but it was worth the miserable journey. There’s now meaning in my daily walk where before I floundered aimlessly throughout all days
Just some thoughts as I wake ......
I wish this journey on all non believers no matter their denial or resistance
Greatest journey I ever took
Posted on 3/15/18 at 6:40 am to Little Trump
quote:
There had to be a creator! Had to be
Why?
quote:
As I tried to then disprove god .... I proved there being a creator that I chose, eventually, to call GOD.
You didn't prove a creator, you accepted one. That's fine, but describe it accurately.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:12 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Without God how do we get something from nothing? How do we get time, space, and matter from the big bang?
How do we have a basis of good and evil with no objective standard?
How do we have a basis of good and evil with no objective standard?
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:21 am to crazyatthecamp
quote:
Without God how do we get something from nothing? How do we get time, space, and matter from the big bang?
I don't know, and neither do you.
quote:
How do we have a basis of good and evil with no objective standard?
We don't have an objective standard with your god.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:27 am to Little Trump
quote:
Who made the space for “bang” to occur? Who made “bang” if that’s truly what happened? There had to be a creator! Had to be
Simplistic thinking makes us assume this. My next question would always be “Then who made the creator” in which most religious people have an ambiguous passage that pretty much means ‘he was always there’. My response to that is if you’re going to just infer that the “god” was always there, why can’t we skip the middle man and assume the universe was just “always there”. From what you’re saying is the universe HAD to have a creator, but your creator doesn’t because he’s magic and that’s just how it works.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:43 am to olddawg26
Because by definition any godlike being exists outside of the constraints of the physical sciences. That's why he can predate the universe. The universe, being bound by those space-time constraints cannot.
If he didn't, he wouldn't be God. A classic line from Star Trek comes to mind when they meet a noncorporeal space entity claiming to be God:
"Excuse me...why does God need a spaceship?"
James Kirk
The point being, of course, that he doesnt.
To delve into this a bit further, let's look at those first much maligned chapters of Genesis. In Genesis 1:3 God proclaims "Let there be light.". I expect that most people believe this to be the sun, moon, or stars.
Except it isn't...the Sun and Moon aren't created till 1:16. Verse three refers to the creation of light itself as a separate entity. Now from physics, we know this to be the photon, the quantum of the electromagnetic field.
Now you may dislike God and the Bible because they go on to tell you what to do with your wallet and your private parts.
That is your right to do in a free world. However, be intellectually honest enough to admit to yourself what the root of your disbelief is rather than pretending it comes from a position of intellectual superiority.
If he didn't, he wouldn't be God. A classic line from Star Trek comes to mind when they meet a noncorporeal space entity claiming to be God:
"Excuse me...why does God need a spaceship?"
James Kirk
The point being, of course, that he doesnt.
To delve into this a bit further, let's look at those first much maligned chapters of Genesis. In Genesis 1:3 God proclaims "Let there be light.". I expect that most people believe this to be the sun, moon, or stars.
Except it isn't...the Sun and Moon aren't created till 1:16. Verse three refers to the creation of light itself as a separate entity. Now from physics, we know this to be the photon, the quantum of the electromagnetic field.
Now you may dislike God and the Bible because they go on to tell you what to do with your wallet and your private parts.
That is your right to do in a free world. However, be intellectually honest enough to admit to yourself what the root of your disbelief is rather than pretending it comes from a position of intellectual superiority.
This post was edited on 3/15/18 at 8:07 am
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:49 am to olddawg26
quote:
he’s magic
Simple minded thinking.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:01 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
by DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Without God how do we get something from nothing? How do we get time, space, and matter from the big bang?
I don't know, and neither do you.
quote:
How do we have a basis of good and evil with no objective standard?
We don't have an objective standard with your god.
Great great questions
These are what I asked myself along the journey and I eventually it all came together in that there had to be a creator that I couldn’t understand. Just because I couldn’t understand him didn’t mean he didn’t exist though
Keep asking these great questions
IMO your agnostic or you wouldn’t be asking these thoughtful questions. I know that because I’ve been there
Awesome
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:15 am to Little Trump
I already asked those questions. I was a Christian for a large portion of my life, and those answers led me in a different direction.
It doesn't mean that "he" does exist, either.
I fall somewhere between agnosticism and atheism.
quote:
These are what I asked myself along the journey and I eventually it all came together in that there had to be a creator that I couldn’t understand. Just because I couldn’t understand him didn’t mean he didn’t exist though
It doesn't mean that "he" does exist, either.
quote:
IMO your agnostic or you wouldn’t be asking these thoughtful questions.
I fall somewhere between agnosticism and atheism.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:35 am to Boatshoes
quote:
Because by definition any godlike being exists outside of the constraints of the physical sciences. That's why he can predate the universe. The universe, being bound by those space-time constraints cannot.
This is simply making something that’s non demonstrable infallible. We can’t test it or prove it right, but you can’t prove it wrong so it HAS to be true since there’s no other explanation yet. If we stopped searching for answers when “god” filled the blanks we wouldn’t have antibiotics. I have no problem with Christians, most are good people with good intentions, but when anything good is God’s gifts and anything bad is ‘working in mysterious ways’ then there’s never a scenario where god could have been wrong. Making something unproven unfalsifiable is disingenuous to a very serious degree. The burden of proof is still with the people who think anyone who doesn’t believe like they do (and most likely everyone who’s from the same area) is going straight to Hell.
This post was edited on 3/15/18 at 8:39 am
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:48 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Polycarp is probably the worst example you could have picked, by the way.
Church Father, saint, probable martyr, disciple of an Apostle, 1st generation bishop, explicitly refers to Jesus as God in the 1st century. That pretty well makes my point.
And you are right on one thing... there are even more specific first century writings from Barabas and Ignatius that also espouse the same doctrine. Belief in the divinity of Jesus is firmly established in the earliest days of the church.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:54 am to BlackAdam
quote:
Church Father, saint, probable martyr, disciple of an Apostle, 1st generation bishop, explicitly refers to Jesus as God in the 1st century. That pretty well makes my point.
I don't care who he was. It doesn't make your point. You have one quote supposedly attributed to him, that y'all can't even agree on.
quote:
And you are right on one thing... there are even more specific first century writings from Barabas and Ignatius that also espouse the same doctrine. Belief in the divinity of Jesus is firmly established in the earliest days of the church.
I'm correct on everything, but at least you're making some progress. We'll get you there.
Speak a little more to Ignatius.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:02 am to olddawg26
quote:
The burden of proof is still with the people who think anyone who doesn’t believe like they do (and most likely everyone who’s from the same area) is going straight to Hell.
Isn't Heaven and hell only for those who believe? Why are you concerned about where people, that believe, say you are going if you don't believe in Jesus? This is what I don't get about non-believers. I subscribe to the belief of what Jesus said in John 14:6, "I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
If you don't, then it doesn't apply, correct?
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:05 am to Lg
quote:
If you don't, then it doesn't apply, correct?
Incorrect.
When it finds its way into legislation, it certainly applies.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:06 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
finds its way into legislation,
What legislation?
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:07 am to Lg
quote:
What legislation?
Any legislation driven by religious beliefs.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 9:10 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Like laws against homicide?
Popular
Back to top


1




