Started By
Message

re: spike proteins express themselves both in the placenta and the testes.

Posted on 6/21/21 at 6:42 am to
Posted by Treeq5
Member since Jun 2021
92 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 6:42 am to
The purpose of COVID, the lockdowns, and masks was clearly for us to get the vaccines.

And I’m not really sure what the hell the purpose of the vaccines is. All I can say for sure is that the vaccines aren’t intended to protect against COVID.
This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 6:44 am
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:01 am to
quote:

Then you at least understand both are unknown variables.



This is the most ignorant, stupid, illogical argument possible.

Yes it’s true we don’t know the long term effects of both.

But I also don’t go seeking out Covid-19 intentionally to expose my body to it. I wash my hands, etc to avoid it.

Just because they’re both unknown long term doesn’t mean I have to seek out either of them.


As the libtards have said all along. I’m trusting the science on this one. Science meaning hard data. A 5-10 year study with the data from these vaccinations in a peer reviewed medical journal that academics and medical professionals use.

If there’s no data then it’s not science it’s opinion.

If in 2030 we have another pandemic and an mRNA vaccine is the solution and I can read the long term effects in a medical journal from the COVID vaccine. I’ll be the first in the line for it as I am for my Flu Shot every year right now.

I don’t think it’s some vast conspiracy. I think the vaccine in the short to medium term is safe. I just don’t feel comfortable with the current data available injecting something into my body. Especially when we’ve probably already reached herd immunity as a society between vaccines and those whom already contracted the virus.

If I was 67 I’d take it. Why? Because the average life expectancy is about 77. So a ten year risk is worth it.

At 30? Hell no.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135363 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:11 am to
quote:

quote:

If you’re afraid of vaccine spike proteins, you should be terrified of COVID-19 spike proteins ....
Then you at least understand both are unknown variables
This is the most ignorant, stupid, illogical argument possible.
quote:

If I was 67 I’d take it. Why?
Because it wasn't actually "the most ignorant, stupid, illogical argument possible"?
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11228 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 7:48 am to
It actually was. Nice low effort post.
Posted by BornCritic
Member since Nov 2020
696 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 8:39 am to
quote:

(3) Unless administered improperly (e.g., overdosed 500-fold like the scary rat study worrying you), a vast majority of vaccine is sequestered within the deltoid.
(4) Sequestered vaccine limits systemic spread


It doesn't seem patently obvious to me that the quantity administered determines whether sequestration occurs. Of course it would affect the measured amounts, but would the graph look any different?
What mechanism makes it true that it only escapes the deltoid when a large quantity is administered?

quote:

So with the widespread effort to scare hell out of the populace over Covid-19, would you not think if Covid infection could be associated with ANY uptick in fetal complications, we'd hear "terrified" journalists screaming such on radio, TV, and in print?

Well, not if they are under the control of people whose ultimate goal was to get everyone to submit to a vaccine that shared the spike protein that could lead to those complications.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135363 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 8:59 am to
quote:

What mechanism makes it true that it only escapes the deltoid when a large quantity is administered?
Access to the circulatory system
Posted by BornCritic
Member since Nov 2020
696 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Access to the circulatory system



That doesn't seem to answer the question. How is access to the circulatory system impacted by the quantity administered?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135363 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:45 am to
quote:

That doesn't seem to answer the question. How is access to the circulatory system impacted by the quantity administered?




Posted by BornCritic
Member since Nov 2020
696 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:51 am to
So Weinstein and his two guys don't understand this maximally simple mechanism which invalidates that concern entirely? Weird.

And what is the point of the distribution study?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:51 am to
You are doing the lords work and a far more patient person than I.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135363 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:56 am to
quote:

So Weinstein and his two guys don't understand this maximally simple mechanism which invalidates that concern entirely?
quote:

Weinstein is misstating both findings and risks associated with the vaccines, and in my opinion he probably knows that.
Posted by BornCritic
Member since Nov 2020
696 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 9:58 am to
So you are saying that he is being dishonest. That would be a bold move on his part.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135363 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 10:13 am to
quote:

So you are saying that he is being dishonest. That would be a bold move on his part.
There seem to be plenty of "bold moves" in this saga.


This post was edited on 6/21/21 at 10:25 am
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 10:50 am to
quote:


I don’t think it’s some vast conspiracy

You had me til here^^^^

They planned it, had exercises for it, and predicted it.
Those same people that did those things made the virus in a lab.

So in order for it not to be a conspiracy, then they shouldn't have made it, planned it, predicted it, exercised for it.

If this were a murder1 case, it's open and shut.

Posted by McTTiger
Member since Apr 2018
407 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 11:15 am to
The Lancet published a study that said Hydroxychloroquine didn’t work and was dangerous. How did that one turn out?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/21/21 at 11:18 am to
Why don’t you ask May 2020 Tiguar?



LINK
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
16595 posts
Posted on 6/22/21 at 5:10 am to
quote:

Illeterate


No, I got common sense you dumb arse, something you're lacking in so go frick off...
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram