- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Speaker schedules vote next week on Epstein files
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:31 pm to theronswanson
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:31 pm to theronswanson
quote:
Whoever votes no on releasing the Epstein files is covering up for pedophiles and human traffickers.
There’s no way any intelligent person thinks you’re going to get anything more than what’s already known. At least not anything meaningful or actionable.
It’s been a decade. If there was any there there, it would be out already. You’re falling for it.
Meanwhile, actual important things are being ignored and politicians are getting away with ignoring them because the public is talking about Epstein and H1B theater.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The poliboard used to call them "groomers" but that is so 2024-ish
Did I call you RogerTheGroomer?
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:35 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s been a decade. If there was any there there, it would be blotted out already. You’re falling for it.
Made a teensy edit...
Posted on 11/12/25 at 7:47 pm to baybeefeetz
The Epstein Estate released emails to/from Epstein & journalists, Maxwell, & others. E.g., this chain between Epstein & the journalist Michael Wolff on the day of a scheduled debate in December 2015 ahead of the Republican primaries & discussing how they can leverage him over that:
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:01 pm to TigerDoc
Even CNN has debunked that
Try to keep up
Try to keep up
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:04 pm to RobbBobb
What's to debunk? What's relevant is Wolff and Epstein discussing what to do if a rumor turns out true.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:10 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
What's to debunk? What's relevant is Wolff and Epstein discussing a hypothetical.
Wolff and Epstein both have made up shite about Trump because they hate him. Melania Trump is going to sue him for $1B, and this is his attempt to muddy the waters.
Nothing is to be believed from his emails. And for the DIMs to redact the girls name, when it was given to them unredcated shows you they have nothing
Just playing games
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:13 pm to TigerDoc
Thanks. I went ahead and asked grok, and I think it gave a pretty good explanation. I then asked which of the victims testified to actual intercourse with Epstein. At least two were 14. That shite is unforgivable. He was a piece of shite just for that. I don’t care about massages and I don’t care that some of the girls kept going back for the $$. He had sex with 14 year olds. And Maxwell felt the girls up while he did it. Cut their fricking heads off. Well, hers.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:15 pm to RobbBobb
They're both bs'ers and could totally be bs'ing each other.
What's your take on Maxwell and Epstein surprised that Trump's testimony hadn't been sought in the investigation of them?
What's your take on Maxwell and Epstein surprised that Trump's testimony hadn't been sought in the investigation of them?
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:17 pm to baybeefeetz
And she's currently getting preferential prisoner status and working a commutation request. gross stuff.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:27 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
What's your take on Maxwell and Epstein surprised that Trump's testimony hadn't been sought in the investigation of them?
ummmmm
quote:
President Donald Trump’s friendship with financier and late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is well documented. But it ended in 2004.
quote:
Edward Tuttle’s architecture designed the renovation of the main house on the island. The renovation concluded sometime after March 2003 and the colonnaded villa-style house is where guests stayed while visiting the island
quote:
In 2005 Epstein hired the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority to install a combination power and fiber optic cable between St. Thomas and Little St. James, providing the island dedicated data and electric connections which eliminated the need for generators.
The island wasnt fully operational until after they parted ways
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:28 pm to RobbBobb
Not sure why that's relevant. The island isn't the only place they committed crimes.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:32 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The island isn't the only place they committed crimes.
Yeah, the girl whose name they redacted testified that at 17 she had sex with Prince Andrew, IN LONDON
Thats why Trump didnt need to testify. he had no relevant info
Posted on 11/12/25 at 8:43 pm to RobbBobb
that's one inference, but JE & GM's inference was that it was puzzling that he hadn't been called, as if he would be a natural witness to something relevant (the "dog that didn't bark" is a Sherlock Holmes reference about a racehorse that vanished without the dog near it barking). I can see why people want the files released. And it's mostly not for Trump's involvement, imo.

Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:27 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
Speaker schedules vote next week on Epstein files
Im genuinely curious as to why, after all of the investigations specifically targeting trump, with the hundreds of millions of dollars that the govt. spent trying to put him in jail, coupled with the 24/7 TDS media blitz, that not 1...(1) person that had access to "The Epstein Files" that could have leaked just the "Trump Specific" info to the media, at a minimum just using snippets of info to make shite look worse than what it is... Why did that not happen??
They had all of 2015, then from 2016---2020, then 2020 through 2024 with almost non-stop Trump threat to democracy campaigning to get right back to where he is now. After all of the lawsuits, charges raids on offices and home, they hold off on using "The Epstein Files" until now?? Why make up and fund "Russiagate" when there are "The Epstein Files" already on hand? ??
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:38 pm to Megasaurus
quote:
Why make up and fund "Russiagate" when there are "The Epstein Files" already on hand? ??
Weirdly today (& to throw CT chum in the water), here's JE emailing with a former Norwegian PM asking to pass on an offer to share insights about how to deal with Trump with Putin.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:54 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
At least two were 14. That shite is unforgivable. He was a piece of shite just for that. I don’t care about massages and I don’t care that some of the girls kept going back for the $$. He had sex with 14 year olds. And Maxwell felt the girls up while he did it. Cut their fricking heads
If only you lefties went after Joe and Jill Biden like this when it was proven that Joe showered with/raped his tween daughter.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:56 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
Speaker schedules vote next week on Epstein files
Why does this need to be voted on?
What happens if whoever has "the files" just sends a copy to Fox and CNN, etc.. etc..??
I would just like to see it all released, unredacted, so all of the mouthbreathers can stfu about it
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:07 pm to bigjoe1
At this point whatever is released will be a huge letdown. People have built this up beyond what could ever be. Nobody from the upper echelon is ever going to go down from all of this. The closest we will ever get is Prince Andrew being told to step down.
Popular
Back to top


3







