Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Some facts from Kari Lake court case today. 170k signatures "verified" at a 99.97% rate

Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:23 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53472 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:23 pm
quote:

Kari Lake’s attorney, Kurt Olsen: “11 of the signature verification workers approved 170k signatures at a rate of less than 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating.”



LINK



One guy approved 100% of 26K by him self.. .. He was just clicking the button.





Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30020 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Some facts from Kari Lake court case today. 170k signatures "verified" at a 99.97% rate


they will admit it is suspicious, but then say it doesnt prove anything was done wrong, signatures were verified, so no standing, kari you lose
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19508 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:29 pm to
All that needs to be done is a careful and honest re-evaluation of signature matching. Last I read, it takes more than a few seconds to call up a signature to compare it to the registration attached to a ballot. 20 to 30 seconds seemed to be the fastest unless those government computers and network were blazingly fast and automatically recognized the registrations to be instantly called up.

Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26640 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:32 pm to
Are those ballots still available to be examined?

Seems her team could do their own verification of signatures and see how badly this was bothced.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20274 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:39 pm to
If fraud is found, I hope each of those “workers” spend some time in jail. A message needs to be sent
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30020 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

All that needs to be done is a careful and honest re-evaluation of signature matching.


that requires the desire and intent to seek to find the truth, they know it was complete fraud and they wont look into it because they dont want to look into it to find the truth
Posted by Beaver Bandit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2015
656 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Seems her team could do their own verification of signatures and see how badly this was bothced.
I know at one point not too long ago her law team was denied the right to view the ballots to actually look at signatures. Not sure if that's still the case though.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53472 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

they will admit it is suspicious, but then say it doesnt prove anything was done wrong, signatures were verified, so no standing, kari you lose




Actually, this was a result of the AZ Supreme court telling them to get it right.

Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
8688 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 5:57 pm to
Ya don't see the scrolling down function ...

BINGO!!

In other words, they did not even compare the sigs ...
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 6:00 pm to
What else do they need? There’s video proof of people just clicking through images at the speed of light.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
11102 posts
Posted on 5/17/23 at 6:03 pm to
Kari Lake won.

Donald Trump won.

Will Jeff Landry?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram