Started By
Message

re: Social Security Building in Kuwait in Flames

Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:29 pm to
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34147 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

No, it was not hit by the north tower.

Why would you just outright lie? If youre going to lie to try to nislead people into accepting your point, posters will think you lie about every theory you try to bring here

Youve already lied about GMax emailing Jeffery Epstein and a 9/11 shadow commission, when the very email you posted was from a journalist named ED Epstein. Now this
quote:

NIST conducted a computer analysis. The goal was to see if the loss of WTC 7's Column 79 led to a complete loss of the building due to fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower

quote:

The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks caused the collapse of the World Trade Center; falling debris from the collapsing 110-story Twin Towers destroyed or severely damaged nearby buildings, including 7 World Trade Center, which collapsed shortly thereafter.

quote:

US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Published in 2008, its report confirmed that fires raged in an uncontrolled fashion after the building was hit by North Tower debris.

Its spread was particularly rapid as the water supply to the sprinkler system had been blocked off by the collapse of the Twin Towers. In the words of the NIST report: ‘Had a water supply for the automatic sprinkler system been available and had the sprinkler system operated as designed, it is likely that fires in WTC 7 would have been controlled and the collapse prevented.’

quote:

As the North Tower collapsed heavy debris hit 7 World Trade Center, damaging the south face of the building, and starting fires that continued to burn throughout the afternoon. WTC1 also caused damage to the southwest corner between floors 7 and 17 and on the south face between floor 44 and the roof; other possible structural damage included a large vertical gash near the center of the south face between floors 24 and 41.

At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse. During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building. The fire expanded the girders of the building, causing some to collapse. This led to the northeast corner core column (Column 79), which was especially large, to buckle below the 13th floor. This caused the floors above it to collapse to the transfer floor at the fifth level. The structure also developed cracks in the facade just before the entire building started to fall
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

No, it was not hit by the north tower.


Wow you're retarded



See that massive gash? That's from debris falling onto it.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Amazingly the north tower collapsed neatly into its own footprint


Yeah! Look how neat this is

You're retarded, bro.



Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Why would you just outright lie?


It isn't a lie, you fricking moron. The poster claimed that the tower hit building 7. No, it wasn't hit by the tower. As I said, and as your post itself claims, fire jumped from one building to the other. Obviously that means debris was on fire and jumped an entire football field into another building. Unless you're trying to say that I was claiming that flames themselves shot all the way across there and caught the other building on fire.

No, the tower itself did not hit the other building.

And still yet, even if you want to accept that ridiculous explanation, again, when can we expect this building in Kuwait to collapse into its own footprint as well?

quote:

Youve already lied about GMax emailing Jeffery Epstein and a 9/11 shadow commission, 


And there is no lie there either. It happened. Are you denying she was invited to sit on a 9-11 shadow commission?
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 11:41 pm
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:40 pm to
How long should expect to wait for the building in Kuwait to collapse like that due to this fire like happened to building 7?

Retarded indeed.

These fricking idiots believe that mere fires can take down modern skyscrapers.

I will keep checking on the inevitable collapse of that skyscraper in flames in the OP.
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 11:43 pm
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

It isn't a lie, you fricking moron. The poster claimed that the tower hit building 7. No, it wasn't hit by the tower.


It was, in fact, hit by falling debris from the tower. To suggest otherwise is to lie.


quote:

How long should expect to wait for the building in Kuwait to collapse like that due to this fire like happened to building 7?


I wouldn't wait. Buildings are typically designed well enough to not collapse due to mere fire. We have plenty of examples of this.

Trying to use this situation to prove a point about 9/11 is about as room temperature IQ as it gets.

Are you the same guy who had the theory about the nuclear "dustification" of the towers a few years back?
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 11:43 pm
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

It was, in fact, hit by falling debris from the tower


But not the tower itself like that poster claimed.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

But not the tower itself like that poster claimed.


The tower itself was being pulverized by the weight of the floors above the impact area crashing down onto it. The debris came down in massive chunks at tremendous speed. Anything in the path of the debris got demolished. Many surrounding buildings suffered catastrophic damage from the falling debris. It was actually the north tower's spire that impacted building 7. We all know WTC 7 is weird and that's why there were massive investigations done into why it collapsed.

List of buildings damaged or destroyed in the September 11 attacks

This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 11:54 pm
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150159 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Are you suggesting that
im not suggesting anything. I asked a question. Can you answer simple questions without talking in circles?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

im not suggesting anything. I asked a question.


I don't answer stupid questions.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

Building 7 is weird,


I'll make it a point to keep checking on that skyscraper in the OP for it's inevitable collapse due to fire.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

I'll make it a point to keep checking on that skyscraper in the OP for it's inevitable collapse due to fire.


Yeah, you do that. Use AI to learn about other buildings that sustained horrendous fires and remained standing. No one ever has suggested that fire alone caused the destruction of the buildings on 9/11.
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 11:49 pm
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:51 pm to
George Bush doesn't care about black people
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150159 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

I don't answer stupid questions.


quote:

Then tell us what happened to #7



Stupid question huh
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

Use AI to learn about other buildings that sustained horrendous fires and remained standing.


Well what do ya know, another completely unprecedented event in all of recorded history. Apparently building 7 is the only skyscraper to completely collapse due to fires.

You guys have convinced me. The government is completely truthful about what happened that day. Good job.

fricking morons.

This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 12:02 am
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

Stupid question huh


What makes you think you're entitled to answers from me to your questions?
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:46 am to
quote:

Apparently building 7 is the only skyscraper to completely collapse due to fires.


So you’re just going to ignore the clear and overwhelming evidence that building 7 was catastrophically damaged by debris from the north tower?
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17172 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 12:53 am to
Na
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 12:55 am
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13192 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 6:21 am to
I'll see your apples and raise these oranges...let us compare them.
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
13523 posts
Posted on 3/8/26 at 6:30 am to
quote:

AlterEd
What do you think brought down the towers and building 7?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram