Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

So much for the Leftist talking point that "Flynn pleaded guilty"

Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:22 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61304 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:22 pm
quote:

It turns out that one serious liberal institution, the Innocence Project, maintains a whole Website devoted to persons who plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit. It’s called GuiltyPleaProblem.com. The first click on it brings up a headline asking the question, “Why do innocent people plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit?” The Website offers illuminating background to the problem.

Some 95% of felony convictions in America, the Website notes, are obtained through guilty pleas. Among persons known to be exonerated, it reports, a staggering 18% pleaded guilty to crimes they didn’t commit. It is a humbling statistic for those of us who cover the courts. The filing of a guilty plea by an innocent party occurs at a pace that leaves GuiltyPleaProblem.com saying: “there’s no telling how many are behind bars as a result.”

So where are the liberals now? Where’s the logic of Judge Sullivan getting up on his high horse over the idea that someone in his court might move to withdraw a guilty plea? The idea that General Flynn was uncomfortable with his own plea deal can’t be a surprise to the judge. It was already in the air when the judge erupted at the general at a now-infamous hearing in open court back in December 2018.

The publication added why isn’t the judge, after seeing the long history of prosecutorial misconduct and overreach at the DOJ, looking into the allegation that Flynn’s family was threatened with total destruction? That’s the real crime here. Instead, the myth-peddling continues because they hate Trump and most of all, they’re lawyers. They’re arrogant—and the prosecution, which Sullivan has indirectly joined with these puzzling moves to outsource the prosecution to the wingnut lefty fringe, never wants to admit they’re wrong.

townhall
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 5:41 pm
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14433 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:26 pm to
Couldn't he just withdraw his guilty plea?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98856 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:27 pm to
I believe he has moved to do so.
Posted by Tiger 10S
Member since Jan 2007
175 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:29 pm to
If one of our children or wife was threatened with prosecution, many would plead guilty to a crime they did not commit in order to spare their family member from doing so. Wasn’t Flynn’s son threatened with prosecution?
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34105 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Couldn't he just withdraw his guilty plea?

Just another issue with the idiot Sullivan
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

I believe he has moved to do so.



I believe that the government's motion to dismiss the charges against Flynn supersede the defendant's motion to withdraw the plea.

After all, defense counsel agreed to that here.

Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:35 pm to
The legally prudent thing to do to force Sullivan to do his job is for the DOJ and Defense Counsel is to do a joint filing for a writ of mandamus to the DC Circuit court of appeals, and if necessary SCOTUS.

Mandamus is necessary here.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

The fact is that it’s by no means rare for persons to plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit. Some are scared. Others confused. Some lack the intestinal fortitude or financial wherewithal to stand up against the warnings or threats from the prosecutors. What’s so unusual in the Flynn case is that the Democrats and liberals are siding against the poor schlepper caught in the prosecutorial vice.



Another poster has already pointed out on another thread , had this been a young black man this DIRTY JUDGE would be acting completely different.

The only qualification to be a judge is a J.D. .
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51648 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

The legally prudent thing to do to force Sullivan to do his job is for the DOJ and Defense Counsel is to do a joint filing for a writ of mandamus to the DC Circuit court of appeals, and if necessary SCOTUS.

Mandamus is necessary here.


I would love to see a Clarence Thomas response to that. He's already pissy about federal judges trying to legislate from the bench via their blocks on Trump's travel ban (which SCOTUS bitch-slapped them over).
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34105 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

I would love to see a Clarence Thomas response to that.

It's not just Thomas. Ginsberg recently excoriated the 9th Circuit for doing exactly what Sullivan did.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51648 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

It's not just Thomas. Ginsberg recently excoriated the 9th Circuit for doing exactly what Sullivan did.


I had completely forgotten about that!


Have an upvote
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36065 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 6:03 pm to
"The Innocence Project is clearly a Russian organization meant to bring discord to the American criminal justice system."

-Decatur
Posted by Zahrim
McCamey Texas
Member since Mar 2009
7667 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Mandamus is necessary here.


i believe they have.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram