Started By
Message

re: So basically the Epstein files are filled with old Bush type Fossils

Posted on 1/31/26 at 11:58 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65729 posts
Posted on 1/31/26 at 11:58 pm to


Yes. It would be. Thanks for highlighting how little credibility these documents hold.
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3277 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:04 am to
Oh.. Tell me why this isn’t credible? Because you say so?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97894 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:05 am to
quote:

I’m still waiting for Massie to go to the floor and name the names.


Yup like he promised

Promises made promises broken
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65729 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:06 am to
We all already know the Clinton campaign was paying Steele. It isn't a secret.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36693 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:12 am to
Dude, the man is a one of a kind maverick who is going to be that voice above the crowd, is going to make a point to push back if for nothing else simply to check Donald Trump……a la Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3277 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:14 am to
quote:

We all already know the Clinton campaign was paying Steele. It isn't a secret


Rubio backer Paul Singer funded it. Rubio was the Senate Intelligence Committee chair that released the Russia Hoax document. You know nothing.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65729 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:15 am to
quote:

Rubio backer Paul Singer funded it. Rubio was the Senate Intelligence Committee chair that released the Russia Hoax document. You know nothing.


Yeah. You got me. Rubio is clearly out to sabotage the Trump agenda. It's so very obvious.
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 12:15 am
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
3592 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Yeah. You got me. Rubio is clearly out to sabotage the Trump agenda. It's so very obvious.


Massie must be trying hard for a cabinet position then
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65729 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Massie must be trying hard for a cabinet position then


You know it! He's MAGA all the way!

How could I have been so blind?! These Epstein files are clearly legit and there's no reason to doubt any of them! Marco Rubio was behind Russiagate!!!!
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 12:18 am
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3277 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:18 am to
He clearly was. Pedo Epstein knew a couple of people in politics and he says Rubio was behind it. You probably know best though, imjustafatkid.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65729 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:20 am to
quote:

He clearly was. Pedo Epstein knew a couple of people in politics and he says Rubio was behind it. You probably know best though, imjustafatkid.


Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97894 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:20 am to
Yeah im sure Unclelogger knows it all
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3277 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:38 am to
?? Singer didn’t find it huh? Retard

quote:

A conservative news website funded by hedge fund billionaire and political megadonor Paul Singer was the first entity to contract a research firm to dig up dirt on then-candidate Donald Trump—leading to the infamous dossier containing unverified claims about Trump’s ties to Russia.


Website Backed By Paul Singer Funded Research That Led To Trump-Russia Dossier
Posted by UncleLogger
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
3277 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 12:46 am to
quote:

Yeah im sure Unclelogger knows it all


I know more than you chucklefricks.

quote:

Hedge-fund manager Paul Singer, largely considered one of the most powerful Republican donors, has tossed his support to Rubio, The New York Times reports. The nod from Singer could funnel millions of dollars into Rubio's campaign, which raised a slightly underwhelming amount of cash in the last quarter. And it could earn him more attention from the GOP's donor class.




Singer backs Rubio



Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
29223 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 2:10 am to
quote:

It's a bunch of transcripts of completely unreliable "tips." Literally every piece that mentions Trump is clearly false


The photo of the "Melania" director snuggled up to a young lady whose face is blacked out, sitting next to Epstein and another young lady isn't an "unreliable tip".
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55412 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 5:51 am to
quote:

I’m still waiting for Massie to go to the floor and name the names.

I don’t understand your point. He got the Epstein files published. There are the names. What good would it do now to read them? We can all read them.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
17528 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 6:30 am to
quote:

but there are A LOT more things to worry about right now in our country's history then putting thousands of manhours on a story


JD used to disagree:


Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2956 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 6:56 am to
So let me see if I have this right. They already years ago followed and showed the money trail of how the Steele dossier was funded and now we have an email from someone as trust worthy as Epstein claiming Rubio funded it and we are suppose to take everything Epstein says as 100% the truth because he has been known as honest and truthful. Do you all realize how dumb that sounds?
This post was edited on 2/1/26 at 6:58 am
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10057 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Every name I have read in this stupid thing are people that are washed up and irrelevant.


Bingo. And same for those Somali fraudsters, they are nobodies. Let it go. And these freaks burning people in trains - I haven’t recognized a single name when they are exposed. They are irrelevant.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13211 posts
Posted on 2/1/26 at 7:17 am to
"sent Sat 1/1/4501 @ 5:00am"

How does this work?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram