Started By
Message

re: "So babies are having heart attacks in the womb?"... "Yes"

Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

No need.


You're just not worth my time. Now, tell me how your religious opinion has anything to do with a woman's right to choose.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
53367 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

You're just not worth my time.


I understand you didn’t like being out in your place and told what a pathetic “legal” argument you made. But saying this is just hurtful.

quote:

Now, tell me how your religious opinion has anything to do with a woman's right to choose.


Who said anything about religion? I thought we were talking law? You couldn’t keep up on the law discussion so you had to create a religion strawman? Good lord. You’re really bad at this.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Good lord


You're too afraid to admit that your objection to abortion is based on your religious beliefs.

Hilarious, but I understand why. I granted your legal nonsense for the sake of argument and you still can't just accept it. Stand by your religious beliefs unless you are afraid.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9877 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

You're too afraid to admit that your objection to abortion is based on your religious beliefs. Hilarious, but I understand why. I granted your legal nonsense for the sake of argument and you still can't just accept it. Stand by your religious beliefs unless you are afraid.

I see you’re still too much of bitch to answer simple and direct questions.

It is quite hilarious to see you “conceding the legal arguments” now after the astounding stupidity you’ve displayed throughout this thread trying to make legal arguments.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
44096 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

You're too afraid to admit that your objection to abortion is based on your religious beliefs.
You’d be a fool to reject that this issue has moral implications, and if so, then there needs to be a standard to judge what is moral and immoral. What is your standard, and why is that your standard?
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

answer simple and direct questions


A sure sign that someone has nothing of substance to add is that they continue to babble on about nothing like you. Afraid to defend your religion.....believe me, I get it.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

What is your standard, and why is that your standard?


Absolutely has moral implications. Morals are subjective. They certainly don't come from some old book written 1000s of years ago and are just as subjective as the next old book.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
33263 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

What about when it is no longer a zygote? Why are you limiting your time frame to that limited period? Very few jurisdictions don’t allow a woman to terminate a zygote. Do you even know what you’re arguing at this point?

Does a woman even know she’s pregnant yet in the notorious zygote stage?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
36750 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Absolutely has moral implications. Morals are subjective. They certainly don't come from some old book written 1000s of years ago and are just as subjective as the next old book.



Uhhhhhhh….. religion is exactly where humans got their overall “moral code” from.

Religion and the threat of what happens “after” is one of the biggest driving force behind the standardization of morals.



And just to be clear, this happened well before the Abrahamic religions
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 7:29 pm
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

religion is exactly where humans got their overall “moral code” from.


Totally wrong. Religious humans need to have a book to base their morals on. Speak for yourself. If you need a book to know that stealing is wrong, please keep your book. Morals have been around longer than your religion.
Posted by LSU12223
Member since Sep 2016
1482 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:34 pm to
Here’s a perfectly good idea. It’s brilliant hear me out. You keep your morals to yourself and dont bash other morals. You won’t see me bash you for being pro-choice even though I disagree with you. I pray one day you find your way to Christ, but again I won’t judge you for that. Nor do I think anyone else here should judge you either. Free will is a powerful thing
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

You keep your morals to yourself


Perfect. So you would agree to keep your morals out of the private decisions between a woman and her doctor. Agree. I have no issue with religious people until they start forcing their beliefs on others. Let's let everyone exercise free will.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
36750 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Totally wrong. Religious humans need to have a book to base their morals on.


and humanity has been hyper religious, as a whole, for thousands of years

quote:

Speak for yourself. If you need a book to know that stealing is wrong, please keep your book. Morals have been around longer than your religion.


There is no god. And like I said, this PREDATES abrahamic religions. This predates the gods of Babylon. This started in the gods we will never know, because they “existed” to the people before history was written down.

Religion is what started civilization. Religions we will never know nor understand.

Your ignorance is laughable.

For fricks sakes… the first written law codes from nearly FOUR THOUSAND YEARS AFO were RIDDLED with religious references
This post was edited on 11/25/22 at 7:42 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150802 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:42 pm to
Arguing with shite head commies is pointless.

Ignore that one and it will slink back to DU eventually or be banned.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Religion is what started civilization.


Now I know you're trolling. Religion came after civilization when humans were trying to explain the world around them. You have it backwards. There is nothing moral that requires a religious belief.

I find it interesting you claim there is no god though. Hope you have the evidence to back that one up.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
10744 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Perfect. So you would agree to keep your morals out of the private decisions between a woman and her doctor. Agree. I have no issue with religious people until they start forcing their beliefs on others. Let's let everyone exercise free will.

By that logic, you are arguing that anyone should be able to murder, rape, pillage, etc with no repercussions. If we all just exercised our free will to the fullest extent, it would be anarchy.

It’s 4 days since this thread was started and you’re still in here arguing for murdering innocent babies.

Really, really sad.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
36750 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Now I know you're trolling. Religion came after civilization when humans were trying to explain the world around them. You have it backwards. There is nothing moral that requires a religious belief.


holy shite you are retarded. Good day, frick stick.

quote:

find it interesting you claim there is no god though. Hope you have the evidence to back that one up.


So is there a god or is there not a god?

How would one prove something doesn’t exist? What is your argument?
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9877 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

A sure sign that someone has nothing of substance to add

… Is comparing humans to pigs and then running away when other people easily show how stupid that comparison is?

… Is continuing to use words you don’t understand like zygote and forced?

quote:

Afraid to defend your religion

I’ll ask again: which religion doesn’t believe ending human life without their consent is immoral?

You won’t answer again because you are a bitch.

quote:

believe me, I get it.

You’re too stupid to get anything.
Posted by BlueJacket
Member since Nov 2022
230 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

So is there a god or is there not a god?


You claimed there was no god. Go back and read your own post. Don't be that stupid.

You failed to name one thing that is moral and requires a religious belief. You just deflected and ran. I understand why. Always gets them.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9877 posts
Posted on 11/25/22 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

So you would agree to keep your morals out of the private decisions between a woman and her doctor.

There’s a 3rd human life involved impacted by that private decision that you progressive morons never want to talk about

quote:

I have no issue with religious people until they start forcing their beliefs on others

All you progressivesdo is force your beliefs on others. In this thread, you’re forcing your beliefs on the unborn.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram