Started By
Message

re: So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...

Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:09 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:09 am to
quote:

. The problem is parents are encouraging this.


For social media credibility. All the little white girls love it.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:10 am to
quote:

You honestly believe that all democrats are child molesters? or are ok with it? is that your stance?

Yes, I do. I think they do it for cynical reasons for the most part, but I absolutely believe that Democrats are opening the door to sex with children deliberately.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:10 am to
quote:

All the little white girls love it.

Which is why you have to be smart and call them out when you see it.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:11 am to
quote:

I think they do it for cynical reasons for the most part


They are terrified of being called transphobic. They would rather let children get groomed than for the Mob to think they are "phobic."
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:12 am to
quote:

They would rather let children get groomed than for the Mob to think they are "phobic."

I'm perfectly ok with mob justice on this.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:

It feels like it’s been expanded way beyond what it meant before the Left wanted to call all non-Leftists racists and homophobes....


No charge, Amigo....
Posted by keltonAve
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2022
202 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Even if they are advocating for or engaged in the grooming of children?


How broad is your definition of "groomer"? That's the potential problem.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7293 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:

cringy boomer shite


Nothing more cringy than "boomer," especially when you tards use on non-boomers.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

So according to Leftists and Liberaltarians , it's not OK to call someone groomer...
quote:

Who are the libertarians saying this?

Anyone with an ounce of manners or decorum.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:17 am to
quote:

How broad is your definition of "groomer"? That's the potential problem.


Conservatives should be as cautious when applying the "groomer" label as Leftists are when applying the "racist" label.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:20 am to
quote:

How broad is your definition of "groomer"?




Groomers



groomers



Groomers



Groomers
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Conservatives should be as cautious when applying the "groomer" label


I know exactly what it is. They come after kids as young as 6 locally.

I don't mind violence to protect kids.
This post was edited on 7/22/22 at 10:21 am
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Anyone with an ounce of manners or decorum.

Any libertarian with an ounce of decorum is for limiting speech? You give off a real Baron Harkonnen vibe, Hank. You know that, right?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120619 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:22 am to
quote:

generally people see that as grooming,


It’s not that “generally people see that as grooming.” It is objectively within the definition of grooming.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Any libertarian with an ounce of decorum is for limiting speech? Y


Hank has no idea what "libertarians" believe. He's a progressive through and through.

Progs lie to themselves constantly.

The NAP covers grooming, he ignores that.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:22 am to
quote:

How broad is your definition of "groomer"? That's the potential problem.

I'm totally not keeping a list of these profiles.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:23 am to
quote:

You think republicans are nazis?
No.
quote:

Left has no issue with that
and I call them out, too.

The far fringe of each political party is populated by emotional children, and in both cases they are trying to influence the saner members of their parties (and sadly succeeding, to some extent).
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283027 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:24 am to
quote:

” It is objectively within the definition of grooming.


Correct.

They are the ones changing objective meanings to blur lines. Not I.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:24 am to
quote:

It’s not that “generally people see that as grooming.” It is objectively within the definition of grooming.

Yeah, but Hank is throwing out words like defamatory to stifle the conversation. He knows he doesn't have a case.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120619 posts
Posted on 7/22/22 at 10:25 am to
All the people I’ve seen using the term groomer are applying it to people who are advocating for kids to be educated about deviant sexual behavior and identities for the purposes of normalizing those behaviors and identifies.

That’s far narrower than the Left’s usage of the “racism” label.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram