Started By
Message

SM-102 in Moderna? This doesn’t sound good?

Posted on 6/14/21 at 2:52 am
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 2:52 am
LINK /

LINK
This post was edited on 6/14/21 at 2:54 am
Posted by Kliner1321
Member since Oct 2020
174 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 2:58 am to
Fauci is evil
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 3:04 am to
I’m 55 and survived the China Flu like a walk in the park. I may consider the vaccine in a decade or more, but until then, no thanks.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 4:24 am to
quote:

SM-102 in Moderna? This doesn’t sound good?
SM-102 is one of the lipids used in formation of lipid nanoparticles. The commercial preparation is labeled SM-102, but is actually a solution of 10% SM-102 in 90% Chloroform.

Chloroform is a defunct anesthesia agent.
Queen Victoria used it during childbirth. Stonewall Jackson's arm was amputated under chloroform anesthesia. Both lauded it as a 'miracle' drug.

Given chloroform's present day use as a solvent though, inadvertent exposure to skin and or lungs rates as hazardous. With long term exposure, chloroform is a potential carcinogen.

In fact, from your link:
quote:

Yes, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine does contain SM-102. And yes, the vaccine is safe.

SM-102 is a lipid molecule. (A lipid molecule is a molecule that does not dissolve in water.) The molecule helps form the lipid nanoparticles in the Moderna vaccine. (A lipid nanoparticle is an extremely small amount of matter that doesn’t dissolve in water.)

When used for things other than medicines, SM-102 is sometimes mixed with chloroform. That’s why websites like caymanchem.com list warnings for SM-102, because of the chloroform. When mixed in this way, it’s not meant to be consumed by people.
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 5:13 am to
SM-102 (heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate) is an ionizable amino lipid that has been used in combination with other lipids in the formation of lipid nanoparticles. Administration of luciferase with mRNA in SM-102-containing lipid nanoparticles induces hepatic luciferase expression in mice. Formulations containing SM-102 have been used in the development of lipid nanoparticles for delivery of mRNA-based vaccines.

Luciferase is a generic term for the class of oxidative enzymes that produce bioluminescence, and is usually distinguished from a photoprotein. The name was first used by Raphaël Dubois who invented the words luciferin and luciferase, for the substrate and enzyme, respectively.[1] Both words are derived from the Latin word lucifer, meaning "lightbearer", which in turn is derived from the Latin words for "light" (lux) and "to bring or carry"


They are injecting people with something that induces a LUCIFERase expression.

How much more obvious can they make it? Go ahead and scoff and believe the lie. Tell yourself that it's just a coincidence and you don't believe any of this Bible stuff anyway.

It is easier to trick the people than it is to convince them they have been tricked.

sm102

This post was edited on 6/14/21 at 5:26 am
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 5:50 am to
Just realize, those getting the COVID vaccine, you are the research.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:02 am to
quote:

Administration of luciferase with mRNA in SM-102-containing lipid nanoparticles induces hepatic luciferase expression in mice.
Which has nothing whatsoever to do with the Covid vaccines. Luciferase and S-Protein mRNA are two different things. Let's try approaching it at a level you might better understand.



This post was edited on 6/14/21 at 6:22 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34954 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:03 am to
quote:

Luciferase is a generic term for the class of oxidative enzymes that produce bioluminescence, and is usually distinguished from a photoprotein. The name was first used by Raphaël Dubois who invented the words luciferin and luciferase, for the substrate and enzyme, respectively.[1] Both words are derived from the Latin word lucifer, meaning "lightbearer", which in turn is derived from the Latin words for "light" (lux) and "to bring or carry"


They are injecting people with something that induces a LUCIFERase expression.



For those here who understand the bio-mechanics of this stuff, does it sound like the insertion of this particular lipid is legit? Other than the obvious chloroform risk? "Bioluminescence"...WTF?

It seems that Knowledge is going to become so complex, the application of it's powers are going to be very problematic...in respect to those who are employing said power. I know (believe, currently) that philosophy/spirituality is or can be questionable as a form of Science/Empirical Reality (whatever that is), but if there is God, and God is Love...then there is Lucifer (God's spiritual opposite). And if there is Lucifer, well, you can damn well bet that a virtually unlimited manifestation of Love's Opposite, is highly problematic.

Country speak. We are getting in over our heads, as power becomes centralized into the hands of those who may serve interest contrary to our own values. Oh well. I'll assume the Good Lord has this, and just enjoy the....whatever. I hope and pray.


Geez!
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
2569 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:06 am to
I’m not getting the vaccine.

That being said, I think they are almost certainly fine and the argument from conservatives shouldn’t be they aren’t safe,

It should be,

We should never have to wait years for a vaccine again.

Clear red tape.

You know pro free market arguments and stuff like that.

You know. Conservatism
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
18963 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:06 am to
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:07 am to
quote:

NC_Tigah



Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:08 am to
quote:

We should never have to wait years for a vaccine again.


We wait years for a vaccine because they are doing clinical trials to see if they are effective AND safe.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34954 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:18 am to
"they"? I'm getting to a place where I don't know or trust 'they'; and suspect that 'they' are not being above board.

And while our 'Leader' wanders aimlessly into a Russian café and has no idea where he is...until wife leads him back into the fold.
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:23 am to
quote:

"they"? I'm getting to a place where I don't know or trust 'they'; and suspect that 'they' are not being above board.


3 expert reviewers from the FDA just resigned because the FDA approved an Alzheimers medicine that got ZERO approval from the 11 experts.

The doctors said the FDA lowered the standards after the board denied approval. Do you think this was the first time that happened?
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
21002 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:24 am to
quote:

Chloroform is a defunct anesthesia agent.
Queen Victoria used it during childbirth. Stonewall Jackson's arm was amputated under chloroform anesthesia. Both lauded it as a 'miracle' drug.

Speaking of, here's a great pickup line anyone can use:

"Does this rag smell like Chloroform to you??"
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14834 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:31 am to
quote:

They are injecting people with something that induces a LUCIFERase expression.


NC tigah, you are trying to explain things to someone who actually posted this.

I mean read that.

But wait there is more...

quote:

How much more obvious can they make it? Go ahead and scoff and believe the lie. Tell yourself that it's just a coincidence and you don't believe any of this Bible stuff anyway.


Yes. These two quotable lines are from the same post.

Do you understand how epic these lines actually are? These are so bad they aren't even good troll lines. So that means this person actually believes it.

So I don't think you are actually going to reach them.

The picture was amusing however. ??
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Do you understand how epic these lines actually are?
Oooooh yes, I do indeed.

Ted Bundy used a Volkswagen to get around, therefore anyone driving in a Volkswagen is a mass murderer.

Was Cat in the Hat too advanced, you think?
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14834 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Was Cat in the Hat too advanced, you think? ?


Way, waaaaaaaaay to advanced. There were words in it.

And the pictures were way too advanced.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 7:42 am to
Nothing is going to stop the Delta variant. It's killing people who have been fully vacinated.

Run for the hills, we're all going to die.

(Daily Mail)

"Indian Covid variant could be the dominant strain in the US within a WEEK, say experts as it causes havoc in UK where 30% of the 42 fatalities linked to mutant were people who'd been fully vaccinated"


Shut the mother fricker down.

Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/14/21 at 7:44 am to
There is no point in trying. Just insult them and move on, they don’t actually want to learn.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram