- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Since I Couldn't Get SFP To Answer My Questions, I'll Ask the PT Board.....
Posted on 11/3/25 at 1:11 pm to texag7
Posted on 11/3/25 at 1:11 pm to texag7
quote:
You claimed on here Trump was convicted of rape and you had to apologize
I didn't have to apologize. I noted I used slightly improper legal language and corrected. It was the rare case of me making a mistake and being wrong, and I was public about it.
That has nothing to do with this
quote:
Dude, you took the E. Jean Carroll case seriously
Though
Posted on 11/3/25 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wait, WHAT?
This page is getting wild, y'all.
You outed yourself. We all saw it before you deleted the shite. GTFO with your bullshite, loser.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 2:08 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
You outed yourself. We all saw it before you deleted the shite.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:so it's funny when a partisan judge and a kangaroo court convicts someone because you don't like people's opinions on a message board. And you expect people to take you seriously when you talk about fairness and justice. Listen to yourself. Officer of the court
Making fun of posters, not Trump.
This post was edited on 11/3/25 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:could you quote the post? I've been busy at work and might have missed it
Which he answered long ago.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:can you link me to your threads mocking dims for cackles loss? TiA
mock all the melts equally. No partisanship exhibited.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:35 pm to UncleFestersLegs
SFP's M.O. is so predictable. He's deflected in this thread by quibbling with me over the word "spy."
As if he would have answered either one of my first two questions if I had said "surveilled" instead. NOT.
He's as disingenuous as any poster here, and that includes 4cubbies and a few others who never shoot straight, either.
As if he would have answered either one of my first two questions if I had said "surveilled" instead. NOT.
He's as disingenuous as any poster here, and that includes 4cubbies and a few others who never shoot straight, either.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:35 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
so it's funny when a partisan judge and a kangaroo court convicts someone because you don't like people's opinions on a message board
That is not an accurate description
You're even focused on the case when I specifically said (and you quoted)
quote:
Making fun of posters
Posters =\= anything directly related to the case.
They have (or should have) control over their emotions, especially if they say things like "emotions over logic", which was the specific theme of the thread. You're just trying to justify the hypocrisy
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:36 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
can you link me to your threads mocking dims for cackles loss?
Which Dems made threads on here?
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:37 pm to KCT
quote:
As if he would have answered either one of my first two questions if I had said "surveilled" instead
They were 100% surveilled in various ways.
See that's an honest way to engage.. still not relevant, though.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 3:53 pm to KCT
SFP tarnished his ‘brand’ all by himself. Kind of sad, in a way…
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
sfp said,
yet....this is productive?
462495 posts
In other words, he/she/they simply does not want to answer the questions.
inB4...."...I have answered the question. many times." as if a normal person is supposed to sift through half a million posts to allow sfp to not answer this time.
quote:
Bad questions are bad. Irrelevant questions aren't productive.
yet....this is productive?
462495 posts
In other words, he/she/they simply does not want to answer the questions.
inB4...."...I have answered the question. many times." as if a normal person is supposed to sift through half a million posts to allow sfp to not answer this time.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:so zero?
Which Dems made threads on here?
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As if he would have answered either one of my first two questions if I had said "surveilled" instead
They were 100% surveilled in various ways.
See that's an honest way to engage.. still not relevant, though.
What a total fraud you are.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:13 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
so zero?
I'm not sure if any DEMs made threads melting.
How am I going to make threads about them if they don't melt? This isn't exactly a hotbed of DEM activity, if you didn't know.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:15 pm to Knight of Old
quote:
SFP tarnished his ‘brand’ all by himself.
To the Dunning-Kruger types? Perhaps.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:15 pm to KCT
quote:
What a total fraud you are.
Just take the L and stop flailing.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
Selective posting been busy!
Slow fanni pro.
Slow fanni pro.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 4:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:they were plenty of posts about Trump never sniffing the WH, or Joe being sharp as a tack or no way trump could beat cackles yet I can't recall a single post of yours even disputing this ridiculous stupidity much less a whole thread laughing at how stupid they were/ are. You'd think in a half million posts you'd have one right Mr non partisan?
I'm not sure if any DEMs made threads melting.
If you can link me one i would appreciate it :)
Popular
Back to top



0






